• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.40 no.4
• /
• pp.613-620
• /
• 2017

Planning dose must be delivered accurately for radiation therapy. Also, It must be needed accurately setup. However, patient positioning images were need for accuracy setup. Then patient positioning images is followed by additional exposure to radiation. For 45 points in the phantom, we measured the doses for 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams, OBI(On Board Imager) and CBCT(Conebeam Computed Tomography) using OSLD(Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter). We compared the differences in the cases where posture confirmation imaging at each point was added to the treatment dose. Also, we tried to propose a photography cycle that satisfies the 5% recommended by AAPM(The American Association of Physicists in Medicine). As a result, a maximum of 98.6 cGy was obtained at a minimum of 45.27 cGy at the 6 MV, a maximum of 99.66 cGy at a minimum of 53.34 cGy at the 10 MV, a maximum of 2.64 cGy at the minimum of 0.19 cGy for the OBI and a maximum of 17.18 cGy at the minimum of 0.54 cGy for the CBCT.The ratio of the radiation dose to the treatment dose is 3.49% in the case of 2D imaging and the maximum is 22.65% in the case of 3D imaging. Therefore, tolerance of 2D image is 1 exposure per day, and 3D image is 1 exposure per week. And it is need to calculation of separate in the parallelism at additional study.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.39 no.3
• /
• pp.297-303
• /
• 2016

This study was conducted to evaluate the dose of the space to the controller located within the mammography room conducted a research on ways to the reduction exposure to the radiation workers. Results, the dose of 6.18 mGy/year was measured when there is no difference in the hilar area of the controller position, the dose of 2.35E-11 mGy/year was measured when installing the Shielding door. In addition, when the direction of the X-ray tube anode be heading this direction controller, low average level measured was 0.30 mGy/year. Based on this study, the mammography should be considered when installing the anode and cathod directions. And, by installing the shielding door, it must be able to completely separate shooting space and control room. This is the best way radiation protection method in radiation workers.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Radiological Science
• /
• 2001.09a
• /
• pp.81.2-82
• /
• 2001

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Radiological Science
• /
• 1996.10a
• /
• pp.92.2-93
• /
• 1996

• Journal of dental hygiene science
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.264-270
• /
• 2013

This research, which was conducted for dental hygienists, intended to check out what factors have an influence on their practices by knowledge and attitude on radiation safety management (RSM). This study performed a survey on such an issue from July 2 to August 30, 2012 for 220 dental hygienists who worked in Busan, Gyeongnam areas. The data was analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 program. The results were as follows: As a result of the knowledge according to the general characteristics and RSM, a statistically meaningful difference was found according to the education on radiation and wearing apron. As for the attitude according to the general characteristics and RSM, a statistically meaningful difference was found according to the education on radiation and wearing apron. As to the practice according to the general characteristics and RSM, a statistically meaningful difference was found according to the education on radiation, wearing thermo luminescent dosimeter and wearing apron. When the analysis of safety management practice for radiation was conducted with the independent variables such as knowledge, altitude and health concerns about radiography, it turned out that the factors having an effect on the practice were altitude and health concerns by that order.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.103-112
• /
• 1986

The purpose of this study was to investigate the numbers and causes of retakes in 300 complete mouth radiographic surveys made by 75 senior dental students. According to radiographic techniques and film holding methods, they were divided into 4 groups: Group Ⅰ: Bisecting-angle technique with patient's fingers. Group Ⅱ: Bisecting-angle technique with Rinn Snap-A-Ray device. Group Ⅲ: Paralleling technique with Rinn XCP instrument (short cone) Group Ⅳ: Paralleling technique with Rinn XCP instrument (long cone) The most frequent cause of retakes, the most frequent tooth area examined, of retakes and average number of retakes per complete mouth survey were evaluated. The obtained results were as follows: Group Ⅰ: Incorrect film placement(47.8%), upper canine region, and 0.89 Group Ⅱ: Incorrect film placement (44.0%), upper molar region, and 1.12. Group Ⅲ: Incorrect film placement (79.2%), upper molar region, and 2.05 Group Ⅳ: Incorrect film placement (67.7%), upper molar region, and 1.69. The average number of retakes per complete mouth survey of paralleling technique (Group Ⅲ＋Ⅳ) was higher than that of bisecting-angle technique (Group Ⅰ ＋ Ⅱ) (p<0.01). There was no difference between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ, and between Group Ⅲ and Group Ⅳ in the average number of retakes per complete mouth survey (p>0.05).

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.137-142
• /
• 2012

This study is investigated dose change on intra-oral radiography when same conditions under the others unit and same unit under the different exposed conditions. Three different radiation devices were studied. Exposure to the upper anterior, premolar and molar on the variant time and dose measure was using semiconductor radiation dose meter. Obtained film density value was analyzed to the belong in the range of diagnosis. Results for dose of each region were less dissimilar between the maximum and minimum. Its value was different 10 times as many as 3 times. In addition, the range of film density was 2.10 ~ 2.95. These values were exceeded on the allow density of diagnostic value '0.25 ~ 2.0'. Even if the same device and the same condition, measured dose was considerable differance and film density was showed show the inappropriate density range. Those can be caused the patient's re-take and patient's diagnostic errors so patients has affected direct and indirect radiological harm. Therefore, dental radiography devices will be required periodical maintenance and also provided standard on the exposure and processing conditions.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.35 no.1
• /
• pp.35-44
• /
• 2012

The goal of this study is to awaken about risk occurred by CT examination. For radio-technologists working at 'S medical center' located in Seoul, we investigated a recognition about dose and risk CT and normal X-ray examination according by working experience in hospital, experience about CT examination and radiation source. For subjects of investigation, radio-technologists working at 'S medical center' located in Seoul helped us. We collected 131 questionnaires for a test of hypothesis. Cronbach @ coefficients of questionnaires were 0.825988 and 0.767161 and a rejection rate of p-value was below 0.05. SAS 9.1(SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.) statistic package was used for hypothesis test. We used Mann-Whitney test, Kruskai-Wallis test, Two sample T-test, Two sample T-test with Bonferroni's Correction and One-way ANOVA methods. P-values of hypothesis about dose of CT and normal X-ray examination were 0.2291 ~ 0.9663. p-values of hypothesis about risk were 0.1924 ~ 1.0000. All of hypothesis is over rejection rate(<0.05). This study shows that radio-technologists of S medical center recognized that CT has higher dose and risk than general X-ray examination.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.10 no.6
• /
• pp.381-385
• /
• 2016

This study aims to propose a method for reducing radiation dose in high-voltage radiography using air gap technique while maintaining the same image quality as when using grids. For an experiment, air gaps were set at 10 cm, 15 cm, 20 cm, 25 cm, and 30 cm with a focus-receptor distance of 180 cm; with each air gap distance, tube current was set at 15 mAs, and tube voltage was set at 80 kVp, 85 kVp, 90 kVp, 95 kVp and 100 kVp. Then, radiographs were taken. In a situation of employing a conventional method of using grids, radiographs were taken at 15 mAs and 107 kVp with a focus-receptor distance of 180 cm. According to the results of the experiment, the surface radiation dose from radiography using grids was 0.130 R; the surface radiation dose at a 20cm air gap was 0.124 R; PSNR between these two images was 10.65 [dB]. In conclusion, the air gap distance, which could maintain the image quality similar to that of a case where scattered radiation was removed and grids were used with a small surface radiation dose, was 20 cm. The result of this study is thought to be used as an indicator to remove surface radiation dose in radiography using air gap.

• Journal of radiological science and technology
• /
• v.34 no.1
• /
• pp.59-64
• /
• 2011

We investigated the radiation exposure caused by DIPS, which is used to identify accurate repositioning and tumor location in pediatric cancer patients proton therapy. To compare and analyze DIPS condition, 50 pediatric cancer patients who underwent proton therapy were selected in Ilsan K cancer-specialized hospital from March 2007 to October 2009. For DIP exposure, 0.09~1.57 mGy is measured in AP and lateral directions and 23.55 mGy is measured in CSI patients. In whole brain patient, the amount of a day DIP exposure dose was 1.13 mGy. During treatment period, who exposed the biggest DIP dose are whole brain patients, 632.71 mGy is exposed. It is 1.13% of prescribed dose, represented dose is adequate because it is not exceeded 2% of recommended dose. Even though the exposed dose is not exceeded more than 2% of prescribed in DIP exposure, we should recognize the radiation damage and genetic influences to pediatric cancer patients, who is much sensitive to radiation and has longer mean residual life time. Therefore, DIPS guideline for pediatric cancer patients should be indicated to minimize the radiation exposure.