• Title/Summary/Keyword: 모수적 방법

Search Result 771, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Generation of Simulation Input Data Using Threshold Bootstrap (임계값 붓스트랩을 사용한 입력 시나리오의 생성)

  • Kim Yun-Bae;Kim Jae-Bum;Ko Jong-Suk
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2003.05a
    • /
    • pp.1179-1185
    • /
    • 2003
  • 시뮬레이션 상의 입력모델에 대한 기존의 연구는 과거의 자료를 바탕으로 선형의 모수적인 (parametric) 모형을 개발하는데 초점을 두고 있다. 그러나 이 경우에는 입력이 매우 복잡한 형태를 가지면 모수적인 모형을 잦는 것이 불가능해지므로 비모수적인(non-parametric) 접근방법이 절실한 실정이다 예로 인터넷 트래픽 모델의 시뮬레이션 수행시 입력으로 제공되는 단위 시간당 요구되는 웹 페이지의 수 같은 경우 데이터들 간데 종속관계가 매우 심하고 복잡하여 모수적 모형을 세우는데 어려움이 있다. 이러한 시스템들을 시뮬레이션 방법으로 분석 하고자 할 때, 기존의 trace-driven 시뮬레이션 방법이나 모수적 모형을 찾아 다수의 사실적인 시뮬레이션 입력 자료를 확보하는 것은 현실적으로 어려움이 있다. 따라서. 비모수적인 방법으로 다수의 사실적인 시뮬레이션 입력 자료를 생성하는 것이 필요하다. 이러한 비모수적인 방법에 대한 평가기준 설정은 시뮬레이션 상의 입력 모델에 대한 타당성을 제시한다는 점에서 또한 매우 중요하다. 본 논문에서는 붓트스트 랩의 방법중의 하나인 임계값 붓트스트랩을 이용하여 시뮬레이션 입력 자료 생성 방법을 개발하였고 Turing test를 통해 붓스트랩으로 생성산 입력 시나리오를 검증하였다.

  • PDF

Comparison of Some Nonparametric Statistical Inference for Logit Model (로짓모형의 비모수적 추론의 비교)

  • 정형철;김대학
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.15 no.2
    • /
    • pp.355-366
    • /
    • 2002
  • Nonparametric statistical inference for the parameter of logit model were examined. Usually nonparametric approach is milder than parametric approach based on normal theory assumption. We compared the two nonparametric methods for legit model, the bootstrap and random permutation in the sense of coverage probability. Monte Carlo simulation is conducted for small sample cases. Empirical power of hypothesis test and coverage probability for confidence interval estimation were presented for simple and multiple legit model respectively. An example were also introduced.

The Nonparametric Estimation of Interest Rate Model and the Pricing of the Market Price of Interest Rate Risk (비모수적 이자율모형 추정과 시장위험가격 결정에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Phil-Sang;Ahn, Seong-Hark
    • The Korean Journal of Financial Management
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.73-94
    • /
    • 2003
  • In general, the interest rate is forecasted by the parametric method which assumes the interest rate follows a certain distribution. However the method has a shortcoming that forecasting ability would decline when the interest rate does not follow the assumed distribution for the stochastic behavior of interest rate. Therefore, the nonparametric method which assumes no particular distribution is regarded as a superior one. This paper compares the interest rate forecasting ability between the two method for the Monetary Stabilization Bond (MSB) market in Korea. The daily and weekly data of the MSB are used during the period of August 9th 1999 to February 7th 2003. In the parametric method, the drift term of the interest rate process shows the linearity while the diffusion term presents non-linear decline. Meanwhile in the nonparametric method, both drift and diffusion terms show the radical change with nonlinearity. The parametric and nonparametric methods present a significant difference in the market price of interest rate risk. This means in forecasting the interest rate and the market price of interest rate risk, the nonparametric method is more appropriate than the parametric method.

  • PDF

Alternative Method of Parametric Inference for Correlation Coefficient (상관계수에 대한 모수적 추론 : 대안적 방법)

  • 허명희;김미경
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.553-561
    • /
    • 1999
  • 이변량 정규분포의 상관계수 $\rho$에 대한 검정 및 신뢰구간을 구하는 모수적 방법으로서 Fisher의 z 변환과 해당하는 점근적 분포가 널리 쓰이고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이에 대한 대안으로서 직교변환과 F 분포를 활용하는 방법을 제시한다. 후자의 방법이 전자와 비교하여 사실상 대등하면서도 설명은 오히려 쉬우므로 통계학 교육에 더 적합하다고 생각한다. 또한, 시험적으로, $H_0$:$\rho$=$\rho_0$에 대한 모수적 임의화 검정법을 제안한다.

  • PDF

Parametric nonparametric methods for estimating extreme value distribution (극단값 분포 추정을 위한 모수적 비모수적 방법)

  • Woo, Seunghyun;Kang, Kee-Hoon
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.8 no.1
    • /
    • pp.531-536
    • /
    • 2022
  • This paper compared the performance of the parametric method and the nonparametric method when estimating the distribution for the tail of the distribution with heavy tails. For the parametric method, the generalized extreme value distribution and the generalized Pareto distribution were used, and for the nonparametric method, the kernel density estimation method was applied. For comparison of the two approaches, the results of function estimation by applying the block maximum value model and the threshold excess model using daily fine dust public data for each observatory in Seoul from 2014 to 2018 are shown together. In addition, the area where high concentrations of fine dust will occur was predicted through the return level.

Comparison of estimation methods for expectile regression (평률 회귀분석을 위한 추정 방법의 비교)

  • Kim, Jong Min;Kang, Kee-Hoon
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.31 no.3
    • /
    • pp.343-352
    • /
    • 2018
  • We can use quantile regression and expectile regression analysis to estimate trends in extreme regions as well as the average trends of response variables in given explanatory variables. In this paper, we compare the performance between the parametric and nonparametric methods for expectile regression. We introduce each estimation method and analyze through various simulations and the application to real data. The nonparametric model showed better results if the model is complex and difficult to deduce the relationship between variables. The use of nonparametric methods can be recommended in terms of the difficulty of assuming a parametric model in expectile regression.

Study on Variability of WTP Estimates by the Estimation Methods using Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data (양분선택형 조건부가치측정(CV) 자료의 추정방법에 따른 지불의사금액의 변동성 연구)

  • Shin, Youngchul
    • Environmental and Resource Economics Review
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-25
    • /
    • 2016
  • This study investigated the variability of WTP estimates(i.e. mean or median) with ad hoc assumptions of specific parametric probability distributions(i.e. normal, logistic, lognormal, and exponential distribution) to estimate WTP function using dichotomous choice CV data on mortality risk reduction. From the perspective of policy decision, the variability of these WTP estimates are intolerable in comparison with those of Turnbull nonparametric estimation method which is free from ad hoc distribution assumptions. The Turnbull nonparametric estimation can avoid a kind of misspecification bias due to ad hoc assumption of specific parametric distributions. Furthermore, the WTP estimates by Turnbull nonparametric estimation are robust because the similar estimates are elicited from a dichotomous choice or double dichotomous choice CV data, and the statistically significant WTP estimates can be obtained even though it is not possible by parametric estimation methods. If there are considerable variability among those WTP estimates by parametric estimation methods in condition with no criteria of model adequacy, the mean WTPs from Turnbull nonparametric estimation can be the robust estimates without ad hoc assumptions, which can avoid controversial issues in the perspective of policy decisions.

Semi-parametric Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for High-Quantiles of Heavy-Tailed Distributions (꼬리가 두꺼운 분포의 고분위수에 대한 준모수적 붓스트랩 신뢰구간)

  • Kim, Ji-Hyun
    • Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
    • /
    • v.18 no.6
    • /
    • pp.717-732
    • /
    • 2011
  • We consider bootstrap confidence intervals for high quantiles of heavy-tailed distribution. A semi-parametric method is compared with the non-parametric and the parametric method through simulation study.

A Comparative Study on Lowflow Quantiles Estimation in Han River Basin (한강유역의 확률갈수량 추정기법 비교연구)

  • Kim, Kyung-Duk;Kim, Don-Soo;Heo, Jun-Haeng;Kim, Kyu-Ho
    • Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.315-324
    • /
    • 2003
  • Stream flow data was analyzed for determining the lowflow which is the standard for river maintenance flow. Lowflow quantiles were estimated based on the parametric and nonparametric methods and two methods were compared by Monte Carlo simulation study. As the results of the parametric method, three probability distributions such as gamma-2, lognormal-2 and Weibull-2, are selected as appropriate models for stream flow data of 13 stations in Han River Basins. According to simulation results, relative bias (RBIAS) and relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of the lowflow quantiles are the smallest when the applied and population models are the same. The fame statistical properties from the nonparametric models are good within the interpolation range. Among 7 bandwidth selectors used in this study, the RRMSEs of the Park and Marron method (PM) are the smallest while those of the Shoaler and Jones method (SJ) are the largest.

Reliability Analysis Using Parametric and Nonparametric Input Modeling Methods (모수적·비모수적 입력모델링 기법을 이용한 신뢰성 해석)

  • Kang, Young-Jin;Hong, Jimin;Lim, O-Kaung;Noh, Yoojeong
    • Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea
    • /
    • v.30 no.1
    • /
    • pp.87-94
    • /
    • 2017
  • Reliability analysis(RA) and Reliability-based design optimization(RBDO) require statistical modeling of input random variables, which is parametrically or nonparametrically determined based on experimental data. For the parametric method, goodness-of-fit (GOF) test and model selection method are widely used, and a sequential statistical modeling method combining the merits of the two methods has been recently proposed. Kernel density estimation(KDE) is often used as a nonparametric method, and it well describes a distribution function when the number of data is small or a density function has multimodal distribution. Although accurate statistical models are needed to obtain accurate RA and RBDO results, accurate statistical modeling is difficult when the number of data is small. In this study, the accuracy of two statistical modeling methods, SSM and KDE, were compared according to the number of data. Through numerical examples, the RA results using the input models modeled by two methods were compared, and appropriate modeling method was proposed according to the number of data.