• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 1999.07a
• /
• pp.65-91
• /
• 1999

말뚝기초의 지지력예측방법 중 신뢰도가 가장 높은 것은 말뚝정재하 시험방법이므로 말뚝기초의 경제적이고 신뢰성있는 설계를 위하여 하중전이의 측정이 수반된 말뚝재하시험을 실시하여야 할 것이다. 따라서, 말뚝재하시험 방법들에 대하여 고찰하고, 시험결과의 해석사례를 설명하였다. 또한, 신뢰성있는 말뚝재하시험 수행을 위하여 고려해야 할 점들도 설명하였다. 또한, 하중전이측정실험에 대한 기본개념을 고찰하였으며, 이 결과의 활용방안에 대한 설명도 부가하였다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.28 no.6C
• /
• pp.379-388
• /
• 2008

In the bi-directional pile load test (BD PLT) for pile load tests of Mega pile foundations, loading capacity standard is not specified exactly. Therefore there are so many confusions in performing the BD PLT and variations up to maximum 2 times in loading capacity are come out. In this study, standards of bi-directional pile load test (BD PLT) were considered. Based on cases of the bi-directional pile load test performed in domestic areas, maximum equivalent test load, test load increasing ratio, loading capacity increasing ratio and sufficiency ratio of design load were analyzed. It could be known that the loading capacity standard of bi-directional pile load test must be defined as 1-directional loading capacity and also must be established as more than 2 times of design load.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2006.03a
• /
• pp.1210-1217
• /
• 2006

실내시험 및 모형시험에 의하면 굴패각은 모래의 대체재료로써 활용가능한 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서는 굴패각 모래 혼합시료에 대한 대형전단시험 결과와 굴패각 모래 다짐말뚝에 대한 현장재하시험 결과를 제시하였다. 굴패각 모래 혼합시료는 혼합율 30%까지는 혼합율이 증가할수록 전단강도가 증가하였으며 그 이상의 혼합율에서는 수렴하는 경향을 나타내었다. 순수모래다짐말뚝과 굴패각-모래 다짐말뚝에 대한 재하시험 결과로부터 두 말뚝간의 허용지지력에는 거의 차이가 없음을 알 수 있었다.

• Geotechnical Engineering
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.53-64
• /
• 1990

There have been numerous methods proposed to predict the pile bearing capacity, but except for the prediction by the pile loading test, not one method is suitable to give a reliable result. Even so, the pile loading test has seldom been performed due to the time and money consuming procedures. In this research, a new way of carrying out the pile loading test, "Simple Pile Loading Test(SPLT)" is introduced. In SPLT technique, the test pile is designed to have a separable shoe with a reduced sized sliding core, so that the skin friction acts as the reaction force to cause the pile tip settlement. Therefore the preparation, installation, loading and unloading of the loading frames and the kentledge can be eliminated.liminated.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2006.03a
• /
• pp.520-529
• /
• 2006

그 동안 몇 차례 오스터버그 셀$(O-cell^{\circledR})$을 이용한 양방향 말뚝 재하시험기법이 국내에 성공적으로 소개/적용된 바 있다. 이 방법은 상대적으로 새롭고 독특한 방법으로서 시험비용과 기존 재래적인 시험방법이 적용상 제한을 받는 경우나 대규모 시험에서 발생할 수 있는 문제점들을 극복할 수 있다. 국내에서는 설계목적을 위한 시험말뚝 뿐 아니라 설계하중이 큰 실제말뚝에 대한 시험이 증가하는 추세에 있다. 이 논문에서 소개하는 양방향 재하시험 방법을 적용하면 기존의 소규모 재하시험 방법에서 발생될 수 있는 주면 마찰력과 선단지지력의 분리측정이나 각각의 지지력에 대한 극한상태를 확인하지 못하는 한계를 극복할 수 있고 시험하중이 270MN을 초과하는 경우까지 적용할 수 있는 장점을 갖고 있다. 본 논문에서는 오스터버그 셀을 이용한 정적 재하시험 방법에 대하여 말뚝종류별로 상세히 기술하였으며 이 시험방법의 장점과 국내현장에 적용되었던 사례를 소개하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 1992.06a
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 1992

본 연구에서는 일반 PC 말뚝과는 달리 제작시 실리카(silica) 재료를 사용하고 중기양생후 고온,고압의 추가양생(autoclave curing)을 실시 함으로써 말뚝자체의 강성을 높인 PHC 말뚝의 항타 시공성을 컴퓨터 프로그램을 이용하여 파악하였다. 일반적으로 임의의 지반조건, 항타장비에 따른 컴퓨터 프로그램의 실행결과는 PHC 말뚝이 PC 말뚝에 비해 항타장비에 의해서 발휘되는 타격에너지에 대해 보다 큰 저항력을 가지므로 설계지지력을 크게 얻을 수 있으며 항타장비의 선정에 있어서도 보다 큰 효율을 지닌 장비의 선정이 가능하여 경제적인 항타작업을 수행하는데 유리함을 보였다. 이와같은 결과를 실제 현장에서의 말뚝 항타시공을 실시한 후 항타기록 및 재하시험 결과와 비교검토 하였는데 본 연구결과와 재하시험 결과가 잘 일치함을 보였다.

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.33-39
• /
• 2004

Most of pile foundations are a condition of fixed head on pile, but lateral loading test of pile have performed to free head on generally. This study performed field lateral loading test accompanying lateral displacement by depth of pile for two cases(fixed head and free head) and analyzed lateral behavior of large drilled shaft. Furthermore compared theoretical equation with result of lateral loading test.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.23-36
• /
• 2007

To overcome the limits of the static pile load test for large diameter drilled shafts, bi-directional low pressure pile load test (BDL PLT) has been used but this test method containes some problems that has not been solved basically. That is, BDL PLT has some problems: difficulty in jack (or cell) arrangement for large test capacity, void remain inside jack (or cell) due to the unrecovery of piston after test etc. In this study, bi-directional double-acting high pressure pile load test (BDH PLT W/DOJ) was developed and confirmed for a in-situ large diameter drilled shaft. At present, test specification of bi-directional pile load test (BDPLT) is being made, and severed main issues (such as, test kinds, test capacity, necessity of use of double-acting and attention of application to service pile) will be contained at the specification.

• Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
• /
• v.12 no.10
• /
• pp.63-72
• /
• 2011

The high capacity bi-directional pile load test is an optimum pile load test method for high-rised buildings. Especially, a high pressure and double-acting bi-directional pile load testing, a special type of the high capacity bi-directional pile load test, is the most practical way to overcome limitations of loading capacities and constraints of field conditions, which was judged to be a very useful test method for requiring high loading capacities. Total of 2 high capacity bi-directional pile load tests(P-1 and P-2) were conducted in high-rised building sites in Korea. Based on the field load test results, the sufficiency ratio of loading capacities to design loads for P-1 and P-2 were 3.3 and 2.1, respectively. For P-2, the load test could not verify the design load if 1-directional loads applied slightly smaller than the actual applied load. Also, high capacity bi-directional pile load tests were difficult to determine an ultimate state of ground or piles, although the loads were applied until their maximum loads. Hence, finite element analyses were conducted to determine their ultimate states by calibrating and extrapolate with test results.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2006

For the last decade, the hi-directional testing method has been advantageous over the conventional pile load testing method in many aspects. However, because the hi-directional test uses a loading mechanism entirely different from that of the conventional pile load testing method, many investigators and practicing engineers have been concerned that the hi-directional test would give inaccurate results, especially about the pile head settlement behavior. Therefore, a hi-directional load test and the conventional top-down load test were executed on 1.5 m diameter cast-in-situ concrete piles at the same time and site. Strain gauges were placed on the piles. The two tests gave similar load transfer curves at various depth of piles. However, the top-down equivalent curve constructed from the hi-directional load test results predicted the pile head settlement under the pile design load to be about one half of that predicted by the conventional top-down load test. To improve the prediction accuracy of the top-down equivalent curve, a simple method that accounts for the pile compression is proposed. It was also shown that the strain gauge measurement data from the hi-directional load test could reproduce almost the same top-down curve.