• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.126
• /
• pp.191-212
• /
• 2013

Cet article consiste ${\grave{a}}$ critiquer $l'{\acute{e}}conomie$ libidinale, $subordonn{\acute{e}}e$ ${\grave{a}}$ l'ordre phallique qui coupe les flux libidinaux. La notion lacanienne du $d{\acute{e}}sir$ qui est $focalis{\acute{e}}e$ sur le manque, ne pourrait prendre en compte la dimension $cr{\acute{e}}ative$ et productive du $d{\acute{e}}sir$ qui est $li{\acute{e}}e$ ${\grave{a}}$ la perspective deleuzienne et guattarienne du $d{\acute{e}}sir$. La $possibilit{\acute{e}}$ de la $d{\acute{e}}rive$ et de la $d{\acute{e}}stratification$ des flux libidinaux pourrait se mener vers la notion du "homo surplus", laquelle est la notion $in{\acute{e}}dite$ que j'ai $cr{\acute{e}}e$. Le surplus est ce qui $d{\acute{e}}passe$ la logique phallogocentrique par son $immensurabilit{\acute{e}}$ et sa surabondance. Dans cette perspective, la critique virulente de la notion du plaisir $cantonn{\acute{e}}$ dans la partie $g{\acute{e}}nitale$, $s^{\prime}op{\grave{e}}re$ avec l'analyse de la jouissance qui est non phallique; Cette jouissance non phallique est $li{\acute{e}}e$ ${\grave{a}}$ l'agencement non $lin{\acute{e}}aire$ et multiple des pratiques sexuelles $in{\acute{e}}dites$ et radicales.

• (The) Research of the performance art and culture
• /
• no.25
• /
• pp.91-134
• /
• 2012

This study is to prove out that the group members' prejudice about divorce was lessened by participating in the sociodrama, making the sociodrama performed during five sessions from September 27, 2011 to November 8, 2011 as object of study. The prejudice was lessened mainly by way of role rotation, which was interpreted on the philosophical basis, '~becoming' of Gilles Deleuze, $F{\acute{e}}lix$ Guattari. The results of this study are as follows. Firstly, the lessening of prejudice about divorce was realized by way of 'true meeting'. It is achieved by the boundary-blurring between 'You' and 'I' through the 'molecular-becoming'. Secondly, the participants took a stricter stance against the divorce by a extramarital affair rather than the divorce by a domestic violence. It is thought that the boundary-blurring in the divorce by a extramarital affair is able to be accomplished more effectively than the boundary-blurring in domestic violence. Fourthly, an understanding of society not as an individual, 'I' but as a community, 'We' worked effectively in solving various social problems. This perspective is helpful in blurring the boundary between 'You' and 'I', and then in seeing 'You' and 'I' as a whole entity. In conclusion, it is found out that this sociodrama program has a considerable effect on the lessening of the prejudice about divorce.