• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.36 no.6
• /
• pp.102-114
• /
• 2009

Urban discourse can be used to create a better living environment through open thinking, understanding and discussion. It raises both physical and social issues surrounding the urban environment. It can encourage the participation of citizen groups and lead the way to develop a community-oriented urban environment through inter-discourse agreement. The urban space of Cheonggye Stream has produced a wide range of urban discourse from 2003 to the present. Discourse regarding the Cheonggye Stream restoration project has been approached by fields including landscape architecture, ecology, urbanism, architecture, politics, and economics, among others. This discourse has reduced a variety of issues and ranges of debate. This study has classified these discussions into related fields and ideological attitudes, analysed their content, and interpreted their meaning. In order to examine the mutual relationships existing among these discourses by different ideological groups, an analytical framework was established byputting classified versions of discourses into a coordinate diagram. The overall topography showing the present status of Korea public awareness regarding the urban environment could therefore be determined. As a result, it was found that the disciplines of landscape architecture took a middle ground between groups with practical and radical ideologies regarding the Cheonggye Stream project and was a mediator for both poles to find a point of contact. However, participatory discourse requires the disciplines of landscape architecture to participate more actively in the discourses on urban environment and take a more active stand corresponding to the zeitgeist and people's sense of public justice.

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.470
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2008

우리 건축문화는 아직은 태동기라고 할 수 있다. 그간 건축계에서 논의하였던 건축문화정책을 제도적으로 지원·육성·진흥하고자 부단한 논의와 문제의 공론화가 있었지만 아직은 걸음마 단계이고 갈 길이 요원한 실정이다. 다행히 행정중심복합도시(행복도시)에서 새로운 패러다임의 도시 및 건축계획이 수립되고 있다. 행복도시는 우리가 그간 논의하였던 건축담론을 실현할 수 있는 기회가 아닌가 한다. 이에 따라 행복도시의 건축정책 및 디자인을 연재하고자 한다.

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.468
• /
• pp.73-77
• /
• 2008

우리 건축문화는 아직은 태동기라고 할 수 있다. 그간 건축계에서 논의하였던 건축문화정책을 제도적으로 지원·육성·진흥하고자 부단한 논의와 문제의 공론화가 있었지만 아직은 걸음마 단계이고 갈 길이 요원한 실정이다. 다행히 행정중심복합도시(행복도시)에서 새로운 패러다임의 도시 및 건축계획이 수립되고 있다. 행복도시는 우리가 그간 논의하였던 건축담론을 실현할 수 있는 기회가 아닌가 한다. 이에 따라 행복도시의 건축정책 및 디자인을 연재하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.601-623
• /
• 2014

This paper is to analyze critically policy and discourse of creative economy and creative city. Applying the concept of 'policy transfer' or 'policy mobility', It points out that it may be inevitable for a certain policy or discourse developed in Western society to change its contents and characteristics in its international diffusing process. And then, this paper describes political contexts and process in which the policy and discourse of creative city of a former mayor of Seoul, Oh, Se-Hoon, during the late part of the 2000s, and those of creative economy of the current president, Park, Geun-Hye, have been suggested and pursued, arguing that those policies and discourses, having been distorted and lack of concrete contents, have functioned as a key ruling tool or political rhetoric. In particular, this paper concludes that the policy and discourse of creative economy of the current government would have little positive effect due to excluding intentionally policy of economic democracy and ignoring unintentionally policy of creative city, which seem to have an inherent relationship with that of creative economy.

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.469
• /
• pp.73-78
• /
• 2008

우리 건축문화는 아직은 태동기라고 할 수 있다. 그간 건축계에서 논의하였던 건축문화정책을 제도적으로 지원.육성.진흥하고자 부단한 논의와 문제의 공론화가 있었지만 아직은 걸음마 단계이고 갈 길이 요원한 실정이다. 다행히 행정중심복합도시(행복도시)에서 새로운 패러다임의 도시 및 건축계획이 수립되고 있다. 행복도시는 우리가 그간 논의하였던 건축담론을 실현할 수 있는 기회가 아닌가 한다. 이에 따라 행복도시의 건축정책 및 디자인을 연재하고자 한다.

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.3 s.467
• /
• pp.67-70
• /
• 2008

우리 건축문화는 아직은 태동기라고 할 수 있다. 그간 건축계에서 논의하였던 건축문화정책을 제도적으로 지원.육성.진흥하고자 부단한 논의와 문제의 공론화가 있었지만 아직은 걸음마 단계이고 갈 길이 요원한 실정이다. 다행히 행정중심복합도시(행복도시)에서 새로운 패러다임의 도시 및 건축계획이 수립되고 있다. 행복도시는 우리가 그간 논의하였던 건축담론을 실현할 수 있는 기회가 아닌가 한다. 이에 따라 행복도시의 건축정책 및 디자인을 연재하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.305-322
• /
• 2006

An increasing number of cities employ rescaling strategies that not only construct metropolitan production network scaled down from national context, but also tune up new governance to effectively control local geographies of the city. In this context, urban redevelopment has emerged a key 'global' strategy to empower governmental institutions of the city, which not only eliminate such threatening spatial variables as deteriorated housing, working-class ghettos, and crime areas, but also increase and extract exchange value of those spaces. I view such practices a process of 'glurbanization'. This paper investigates how state/city government employs the discourse of urban re/development for 'inventing' poverty at an urban scale: how it institutionalizes the discourse for implementing concrete projects: and how urban institutional apparatus appropriate their discursive practices of redevelopment for their own ends in the city. By particularly focusing on the California Redevelopment Law and the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, this paper analyzes the ways in which the law and the agency extract value from what they define 'blight areas' by means of eminent domain and tax increment revenues. For empirical analysis I employ discourse analysis and institutional ethnography. I conclusively argue that the urban spaces stigmatized as 'blight areas' are increasingly entrapped by the urban redevelopment agency, which extracts increased exchange value from the areas and redirects it for supporting external investors, private developers, and the body of the agency itself.

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.598
• /
• pp.16-19
• /
• 2019

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.657
• /
• pp.36-39
• /
• 2023

• Korean Architects
• /
• s.657
• /
• pp.40-43
• /
• 2023