• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.6
• /
• pp.55-62
• /
• 2019

We examined the Audit Quality on the Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) Corporate. We used 1,497 sample data from 2014 to 2016. In short, the result of this paper's is as followed. Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) has a positive relevance with Audit Quality. Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) has a positive relevance with Audit Fee, Audit Time and Audit Size specifically. Therefore we can support that a firm has a high level of Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) will have the better the Audit Quality according to this study. This study contributes as follow. We can verify that the more Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) the better Quality of Accounting Information. We expect that this study can be helped positive image enhancement of Socially Responsible Investment(SRI) Corporate. So we hope that our paper can contribute sound capital market's development.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.6
• /
• pp.203-218
• /
• 2019

Using the sample of 104 mutual savings banks inspected by the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) on June 2011, this study examines if mutual savings banks manage BIS capital adequacy ratio using allowance for bad debts through comparison of BIS capital adequacy ratio before and after the 2011 when mutual savings banks experienced a large-scale restructuring by financial supervisory authorities. We find that mutual savings banks mainly use the allowance for bad debts to manage BIS capital adequacy ratio. It also shows that mutual savings banks with a business suspension order by FSS manage BIS capital adequacy ratio more than the others. Lastly, we find that Non Big4 auditors as well as Big 4 auditors don't effectively audit the use of the allowance for bad debts for mutual savings banks to manage their BIS capital adequacy ratio.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.227-238
• /
• 2019

In this study, we investigate the effects of disclosure and high-quality audit on donations to charitable organizations in Korea. We find that the mandatory disclosure of financial information and high-quality audit is significantly and positively related to donations to charitable organizations. We also find that charitable organizations audited by Big 4 audit firms have greater likelihood to receive more donations, compared to those audited by non-Big 4 audit firms. Furthermore, we find that those positive associations are more pronounced for smaller charitable organizations. Collectively, those results imply that, as in the profit-making sector, disclosure and high-quality audit play a critical role in enhancing accountability and transparency of financial reporting and revenue for charitable organizations.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.153-164
• /
• 2014

This study is to investigate the effects of intangible assets such as research & development, education & training and advertisement on firm values of high-technology firms and low-technology firms listed in the KOSDAQ market, and to analyze the value-relativeness between the audit quality of companies and the expenditure of intangible assets. The substitute measurement of firm values is Tobin's Q model. The sample period for positive analysis is from 2003 to 2008, and the samples, excepting for financial business, are manufacturing companies of closing accounts corporate on December, based on companies of KOSDAQ that are listed in security. Finally, data from about 305 companies are used in this analysis. Followings are the results of the analysis. First, research & development, education & training of high-technology firms have an effect on firm values, and education & training of low-technology have an effect on firm values. Second, we find that audit quality(BIG4) increases the value relevance of R&D expenditures of high-technology firms and audit quality(BIG4) increases the value relevance of education & training expenditures of low-technology firms. This paper is meaningful in that it verified the value-relativeness of cost of intangible assets compared with high-technology firms to low-technology firms.