• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.244-255
• /
• 1993

본 연구를 수행하게된 동기는 1994년부터 미국에서 S.A.T.를 개정하고, 한국에서는 대학 수학 능력 시험 제도라는 새로운 제도가 도입되는 것에 있다. 대학 학업 적성 평가 제도로서 미국의 S.A.T. 제도에 대한 유효성이 많은 학자들에 의해서 연구되고 있다. 대학 수학 능력 시험과 S.A.T.는 각각 한국과 미국의 대학에서 학업 적성을 측정한다는 면에서 그 목적이 같다. 한국의 대학 수학 능력 시험의 유효성을 연구하기에는 아직 실시되지 않았으므로 너무 이르다고 본다. 대학 수학 능력 시험 제도 확립이 실험 평가에 근거하기 때문에 대학 수학 능력 시험 실험 평가와 S.A.T.를 비교 연구하는 것은 의미가 있다고 본다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 한국의 대학 수학 능력 시험 실험 평가(수리)와 미국의 S.AT.(수학)와의 상관 관계를 연구한다. 본 연구의 조사 대상으로 선발된 집단으로서 광주시의 3개교 6학급의 고등학교 3학년 283명이 참가하였다. 본 논문에서 다음과 같은 문제가 연구되었다. 1. 7차 실험 평가(수리)와 S.A.T.(수학)의 평균 점수에 대한 남녀 차이의 통계학적 유의성 (statistical significance). 2. 7차 실험 평가(수리)와 S.A.T.(수학)의 평균 점수에 대한 자연계 인문계 차이의 통계학적 유의성 (statistical significance). 3. 한국의 대학 수학 능력 시험 실험 평가(수리)와 미국의 S.A.T.(수학)의 상관 관계.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.98
• /
• pp.84-87
• /
• 1999

• 대학교육
• /
• s.180
• /
• pp.31-35
• /
• 2013

• 대학교육
• /
• s.87
• /
• pp.18-24
• /
• 1997

• 대학교육
• /
• s.119
• /
• pp.106-115
• /
• 2002

• 대학교육
• /
• s.154
• /
• pp.58-65
• /
• 2008

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 1996

This study provides an overview of the accreditation landscape in Korea, and identifies some problems in the current accrediting review program which assesses the library's achievements These are as follows: (1) The weight given to the library sector is insufficient. (2) There are no indicators to appraise the achiement of the informational and educational functions of academic libraries (3) It is completely devoted to input indicators, but not process or output indicators (4) It is impossible to evaluate the quality os library services. (5) The units of statistics are not standardised. Some alternative measures and indicators are proposed to evaluate the performances of academic libraries' services. It is suggested that an official draft should be prepared by Korean academic librarians to amend the library sector of current accrediting review program.

• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.25-58
• /
• 2009

This study aimed to establish a conceptual scheme of the quality of university and to develop a set of structured indicators for assessing the quality of university based on the result of comparative analysis of major approaches in foreign countries. Reviewing extensive literatures regarding the quality of higher education, a conceptual scheme of the quality of university, in which three representative approaches such as a goal-accomplishment approach, a customer-satisfaction approach, and a value-added approach were emphasized, was proposed and the quality of university was defined as a function of harmonization of input-process-output elements of universities. To develop indicators for assessing the quality of university, four types of approaches including university accreditation system, commercially-producted university ranking system, college student survey, and direct assessment of students' learning outcomes were reviewed. Finally thirteen sets of evaluation indicators out of six countries were comparatively analyzed. The analyses focused on the format, the content, and the primary concept of the quality in each instrument and a draft of the assessment indicators were structured. The draft of the assessment indicators were verified through a panel of professionals. The final indicators assessing the quality of university consist of three dimensions and seven areas. The input dimension comprised institutional goals, human resources, and physical resources. In the process dimension, curriculum and learning process areas were included. And, finally, the output dimension consists of educational outputs and research outputs. Based on the outcomes of the study, the recommendations were suggested for improving and utilizing the assessment indicators of the quality of university.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.175
• /
• pp.68-75
• /
• 2012

• 대학교육
• /
• s.168
• /
• pp.70-72
• /
• 2010