• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.125-152
• /
• 2016

This study aims to analyze the impacts of the QS Asia University Rankings (QSAUR) indicators and to compare the scores obtained by major countries. Hierarchical multiple regression was performed on the results of the QSAUR 2013-2015 and the average indicator and overall scores of each country were calculated. In the QSAUR, the most influential indicator was academic reputation. Each indicator's influence corresponded to its assigned weights and standard deviations. The results of the comparison revealed that Japan, South Korea, and China had the largest number of institutions among the top 150, while Singapore maintained the highest average scores on the indicators as well as the overall score. Each country had different areas that required improvement. South Korean colleges scored lower than some countries on academic reputation, papers per faculty, and international faculty. To attain higher ranks in the QSAUR, academic reputation, institutions' research capability improvement, and internationalization are needed. The implementation of these strategies is necessary to diminish the gap between South Korean institutions and other Asian institutions.

• Journal of Digital Contents Society
• /
• v.6 no.3
• /
• pp.189-193
• /
• 2005

The Korean University faced the rapid challenge of M&A. The Korean Government had a evaluation of all Universities and colleges. This paper investigated the transactional and real time properties of the University Evaluation Indexes and suggested these indexes to the BI(Business Intelligence) system contents.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.70
• /
• pp.92-99
• /
• 1994

대학의 목적 성취에서 행정직원의 역할은 증대되고, 그들에게 투입되는 인건비는 대학재정의 상당 부분을 차지한다. 대학 조직의 효과성을 제고하고 자원의 효율적인 활용을 도모하기 위하여 행정직원에 대한 평가는 거부될 수 없으며, 조직구성원으로서 감수해야 할 의무라고 할 수 있다. 행정직원에 대한 평가가 실시된다면 하위직뿐만 아니라 상위직까지 모두가 그 대상이 되어야 한다. 행정직원에 대한 평가에는 인적.물적 자원이 소요되고, 평가 결과는 대학의 인적 자원 관리에 많은 기여를 할 수 있다. 따라서 평가는 효율적.효과적으로 수행되어야 하며, 그 결과도 유용하게 활용되어야 한다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.168
• /
• pp.20-26
• /
• 2010

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.255-270
• /
• 2004

American Academic Accreditation System was reviewed. Current accreditation standards of the six regional accreditation associations were analysed with reference to the evaluation of academic libraries. That analysis was led to the recognition of some trends; mission and goal based assessment, qualitative evaluation, emphasis on the student learning outcomes, emphasis on the teaching role of academic librarians, distance education, and less prescriptive text. Some suggestions were made for revision of the Korean academic accreditation standards related to libraries.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.152
• /
• pp.72-76
• /
• 2008

• 대학교육
• /
• s.184
• /
• pp.124-129
• /
• 2014

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.27-50
• /
• 2015

The top thirty universities in 2014 by the college rankings of the Korea Joongang Daily were chosen for the samples of this study to find how much academic libraries affect the competitiveness of universities. Evaluation scores of the universities in four areas, and building size, budgets, the number of collections and personnels were also decided as the variables in this study. The influence to the universities' evaluation and rankings of their libraries through average and correlation analysis was studied. The major findings of the study are: (1) Average analysis between metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas found that there were significant differences in globalization indicators, reputation, and social advance degree. Also, (2) Correlation analysis found that library budgets and the number of personnel highly affected the university evaluations or rankings compared to the other variables.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.143
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 2006

국제수준의 전문성을 토대로 한 평가를 통해 대학들의 자기혁신을 지원하고 우리나라 대학교육의 경쟁력을 강화하기 위해 고등교육 평가기능을 전문적.체계적으로 수행하는 국가 차원의 평가전담기구의 필요성이 여러 측면에서 대두되고 있다. 민간과 정부, 대학 간의 공동협력을 통해 선진국 수준의 고등교육 질 보장 체제를 구축하여 대학의 국제경쟁력을 지속적으로 강화하고, 이를 바탕으로 대학교육 환경의 미래변동에 능동적으로 대처하는 일은 더이상 지체할 수 없는 시급한 사안이다.

• Journal of vocational education research
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.23-49
• /
• 2011

Faculty performance evaluation system has been settled down as an uncomfortable but unavoidable system, and it is one of the most important factors to grow the college competitiveness up. In this study, we selected and surveyed faculty evaluation models of several universities and colleges in Korea, and analyzed by comparing each evaluation areas of educational achievement, college-industry collaboration, research, and service. We also identified the properties of the current faculty evaluation models of the junior colleges, and derived several problems from these models such as an imitation of four-year university model, a disorders of job evaluation with respect to the attributes of classified jobs, a large variation of individual item weights, and an insufficient reflection of major characteristics. Based on these surveys and analysis, an improved faculty evaluation model for the junior college is proposed in this study. This model proposed four basic areas-educational achievement, college-industry collaboration, research, and service by considering the importance of the college-industry collaboration in the junior college-as well as the team evaluation area. Weights of the SCI-class paper was selected as a criterion for the arrangement of objective comparison of each evaluation items. We showed the integration method of several different evaluation model with respect to the attributes of classified jobs of each faculties, and evaluation plan of variational characteristics according to the majors of individuals in this model. Finally, we introduced an area fail and rating system to operate efficiently the proposed faculty evaluation model.