• 대학교육
• /
• s.89
• /
• pp.66-75
• /
• 1997

우리나라에서 대학입학은 직접적인 관련 집단의 민감한 사안일 뿐만 아니라, 모든 국민의 공통적인 관심사이다. 그런 만큼 대학입학 전형제도는 대학입학 전형의 의미에 비추어 도출되는 규범적 원칙들에 기초하여 신중하게 수립되어야 한다. 전형요소 설정의 타당성, 전형유형 설정의 공정성, 전형과정의 자율성 등의 준거에 비추어 새 대학입학 전형제도의 정책논리를 비판적으로 고찰하고 발전방향을 제시하고자 한다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.128
• /
• pp.32-42
• /
• 2004

대학입학제도의 재점검 작업은 폭넓은 참여와 깊이 있는 연구를 기반으로 충실하게 이루어져야 할 것이다. 정부는 검토대상의 과제들을 마련하고, 해당과제에 참여하는 전문가를 결정하여, 과제의 수행방식을 결정하고, 과제수행의 결과를 확정하며, 이를 활용하여 대학입학제도를 개선하여야 할 것이다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.90
• /
• pp.47-60
• /
• 1997

대학은 획일화되어 있는 대학입학 사정 방법에 준하여 우수 학생을 유치하려는 지엽적.한시적인 정책 수립 안목에서 벗어나 21세기를 대비한 우수한 교육과정과 프로그램 개발 그리고 그에 부합하는 신입생을 선발하는 장기적이며 미래지향적인 계획을 수립하여야 한다. 이러할 때 대학이나 학과의 특성을 드러낼 수 있으며, 타대학 혹은 타학과와 경쟁하지 않고 자체가 경쟁의 대상이 되어 대학이나 학과의 발전을 가져온다. 여기에서 미국 대학입학제도의 다양성을 참고함은 유사한 대학입학제도에 따른 우리나라 교육의 문제점을 해결할 수 있는 시사점을 제공받을 수 있기 때문이다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.69
• /
• pp.102-107
• /
• 1994

여기서 필자가 논의하는 입학제도 개혁안이 당초 목표하는 성과를 거두기 위해서는 입시제도 외적인 맥락과 관련해서도 보다 심도있는 입체적 연구와 검토가 뒤따라야 할 것이다. 그러나 입학제도 개혁의 방안은 제도의 구체적이고 세부적인 내용에 있어서는 다양한 의견의 스펙트럼을 보일지라도 그 골격에 있어서는 수험생의 건전한 대학 지원과 고등학교 교육의 정상화 그리고 대학의 자율성과 다양성을 동시에 충족시키는 방향이어야 함은 두말할 필요가 없을 것이다. 또한 개혁안이 이러한 철학을 공유하고 있다면 구체적인 학생 선발 방안에서 나타나는 외형적 상이점은 별로 중요한 문제가 아니라고 할 수 있다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.149
• /
• pp.90-94
• /
• 2007

대학입학사정관제란 대입관련 자료를 조사 및 심사하여 입학 여부를 결정하는 전문가를 활용하여 학생의 성적, 환경, 잠재력 소질 등을 포괄적으로 판단하여 신입생을 선발하는 제도로서 중등교육의 정상화 및 대학에서의 우수인재 선발에 기여할 것으로 기대된다. 이에 제도의 도입에 따른 과제 및 앞으로의 추진방향 등에 관해 살펴보기로 한다.

• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2016

The purposes of this study are to analyze the higher education admission policy of France and to draw policy implications for Korea. For this study, literature reviews and interviews (face-to-face, email, telephone) were adopted for main research methods. The major findings were as follows: First, baccalaur?at diploma is necessary for higher education admission in France but each higher education has different admission policy according to their legal status. University has open enrollment policy and has no student selection process. Other higher institutions such as grands ?coles select students based on students' academic achievements. Second, baccalaur?at is national diploma which shows successful conclusion of the upper secondary education and gives right of access to higher education. This diploma is awarded to candidates who have passed a series of standardized written and oral tests drawn up at national level (10/20points). Third, students' academic achievements in high schools are major criteria for admission for higher institutions which has student selection process. Fourth, entrance exams implemented at college level are various according to higher institution. Last, 'Admission Post-bac-APB' site is used to support and facilitate the whole admission process. Based on these findings, several policy implications were suggested.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.1359-1368
• /
• 2013

An "admission officer system" has been introduced for the purpose of changing the paradigm from the "current admission system". This is because the current admission system mainly reflects the scholastic ability test (SAT) score regulating student selection for entering university. The admission officer system focuses on not only the students' school records but also, their potential. In addition, this system lets the university screen the students according to its own founding philosophy. One feature of the admission officer system is to cultivate men of ability by caring for the selected students consistently. Typically, students are selected by an admission officer system according to document screening which includes curriculum and non-curriculum scores, discussions, and interviews. On the other hand, the admission officer system might create a lack of objectivity in the way a student is selected because of the admission officer's own subjectivity. In this study, an algorithm in which the admission officer system can maintain the objectivity on student selection is presented. This is so that the student does not experience any disadvantage from the process of the admission officer system.

• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.125-147
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to explore university entrance system with particular regard to the interview system of some leading universities. In order to accomplish this end, I sketched university entrance system as a whole, applying procedures and entrance requirements, selecting criteria, and explore interview systems of leading universities, including Oxford, Cambridge, UCL and Imperial College. The university entrance system in the UK is closely related to the educational achievements at secondary schools and sixth form colleges. Admissions tutors look at applicant's academic ability and potential through various entrance requirements. Leading universities such as Oxbridge stress performance at interview with excellent examination grades, due to competition for places is strong. Admissions tutors are looking for the students who are best suited to the unique university education in general and the course applied for. The university entrance system in the UK would be shed light on Korea university entrance system in terms of basic principles and interviews as a whole and of addressing the academic ability and potential to flourish at the university.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.169-178
• /
• 2017

The main objective of this paper is to study if the admission officer system is settled down successively. We compare two groups, one admitted by the admission officer system and the other admitted by the usual system in terms of school life satisfaction, academic achievement and career status after graduation. In this paper, 404 students, who had graduated in 2016 and had data on three indices were analyzed by mean difference test and Chi-squared test. The analysis results show that there are no differences between two groups statistically. The main factor on the career status after graduation is the academic performance rather than the admission system. This means the H university, which has been chosen as the leading university for the admission officer system since 2008, has settled down the admission officer system successfully.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.137
• /
• pp.35-40
• /
• 2005