• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2019.10a
• /
• pp.144-148
• /
• 2019

비유창성(disfluency)은 문어와 같이 정연한 구조로 말하지 못하는 현상 전반을 지칭한다. 이는 구어에서 보편적으로 발생하는 현상으로 구어 의존 구문 분석의 난이도를 상향시키는 요인이다. 본 연구에서는 비유창성 요소 유형을 담화 표지, 수정 표현, 반복 표현, 삽입 표현으로 분류하였다. 또한 유형별 비유창성 요소를 실제 말뭉치에서 어떻게 구문 주석할 것인지를 제안한다. 이와 같은 구어 데이터 처리 방식은 대화시스템 등 구어를 처리해야 하는 도메인에서의 자연언어이해 성능 향상에 기여할 것이다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.25-38
• /
• 2017

This study investigates non-native speakers(NNS) of English use of backchannels with beginner-intermediate learners' use of 'uh', 'um(uhm)', 'and' and 'hm' suggesting a view as a possible pedagogical implication. The initial aim of this study was to learn this phenomenon and observe their conversation patterns to compare with previous studies. Based on the previous findings, the analyzed data using conventional Conversation Analysis (CA) methods indicate the possible presence of L1 topic markers, '-un' and '-nun' in the form of L2 backchannel tokens when uttered by beginning and intermediate level speakers of English and the presences of L2 backchannel tokens appear only in front of noun phrases. Additionally, these same words with these tokens and when translated back to Korean also require topic markers of '-un' and '-nun.' Finally, This study discusses possible pedagogical implications with the initial analysis of backchannel tokens for Korean EFL learners. In addition, the ultimate goal of this study is to refine this analysis with follow up experiments to validate this investigation into a working hypothesis generating discussions of this backchannel phenomenon from being viewed as a hindrance to as an positive influence that needs to be understood.

• Journal of Korean language education
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.181-219
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to review the functions of {됐어} and {X了} as a discourse marker on different levels, and to examine their similarities and differences. {됐어} has not been widely recognized as a discourse marker in the field of Korean linguistics and Korean language education. Therefore, in order to establish the identity of {됐어} as a discourse marker, the reasons that {됐어} can be regarded as discourse marker were explained prior to the contrastive analysis. As to the method of contrastive analysis for {됐어} and {X了}, they were analyzed on three main dimensions: that is, the textual dimension, the interpersonal dimension, and the metalinguistic dimension in the corpus consisting of scripts of Korean and Chinese sitcoms. The results are as follows. In the textual domain, {됐어} and {X了} have the function of closing the topic in common, while {X了} can indicate a new topic and transmit a topic. In terms of functions in the interpersonal domain, {됐어} and {X了} are commonly used to refuse a partner's proposal or request and to interrupt a partner's speech or action. Furthermore, in the interactional aspect, {됐어} and {X了} performs the function of expressing a response to a preceding utterance and taking the turn of speaking. The difference between them in the interpersonal domain is that {X了} performs the function of correcting a speaker's utterance. In the metalinguistic domain, {됐어} and {X了} are common in that they perform the function of expressing the dissatisfaction of the speaker, showing generosity and making a compromise with the addressee. {X了}'s distinguishing characteristics in this domain is that it can express the attitude of consoling the hearer.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.293-303
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to classify a three-fold role of the history of mathematics through epistemological analysis. Based on the history of infinity and limit, the "potential infinity" and "actual infinity" discourses are described using four different historical epistemologies. The interdependence between the mathematical concepts is also addressed. By using these analyses, three different uses of the history of mathematical concepts, infinity and limit, are discussed: past, present, and future use.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1998.10c
• /
• pp.358-364
• /
• 1998

본 연구는 한국어 대화인지모형을 구축하는 데 필요한 화용론적 지식에 관한 연구의 일환으로, 부대화의 개시 및 종료 시점에서 나타나는 담화 참여자의 의도 및 그 의도와 관련된 표층표지를 분석하고, 나아가 필수 논항 성분의 하나로서 대화체에서는 자주 생략되어 나타나는 청화자 논항의 의미복원을 위한 예비적 단계로서 술어의 어미 특성 및 화자의 언어행위 혹은 화행과 관련하여 청자 논항의 생략 유형을 분류하고 분석했다. 이러한 연구는 한국어 대화 에이전트를 개발하는데 있어 필수적인 단계로서 향후 대화체 이해시스템 연구에 기초적인 틀을 제공해 줄 수 있다.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.75-83
• /
• 2021

This study will analyze the meaning of the signifiant, which occupies an absolute position in Lacanian psychoanalysis, and will prove the slip of meaning and signification that are accompanied together at the same time when the signifiant was utter through the subject. By directly citing the part where Lacan explained signification in his seminars and Écrits, I would like to examine how signifiant is carried out in everyday conversation. In addition, the dialogue that takes place in our discourse has the purposefulness and groundless purposelessness of the signifiant. Understanding this purpose is the core part that Lacanian psychoanalysis aims to pursue, and it discovers the cracks of the hidden meaning in the relationship between the signifiant and the signifiant connected to the next, presenting that the signifiant which arouses unrelenting fantasy of the subject is the practical ruler of body and mind. This thesis is aimed to present the above points mentioned above, and as an alternative to overcome the limitations of the signifiant, the ruler in discourse, this study would like to suggest the autonomy as a subject resisting against "Where it was, I must come into being," pursued by Lacan psychoanalysis.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 1987

학교 교실에서의 수업 활동 중 가장 주된 활동은 언어적 의사소통이며 대부분의 지식 전달이 교사의 언어 활동을 통해 이루어 지고 있다. 그리고 교사의 언어적 의사소통의 순서와 구조는 효과적이고 효율적인 학습에 중요한 의미를 가지므로 이를 조직적으로 분석 평가할 필요가 있다. 따라서, 이 연구는 교실에서의 교사 언어 행동의 구조를 분석 연구할 수 있는 방법론적 기초를 마련하고자 Anderson 의 역동적 구조 이론 (Theory of Kinetic Structure) 을 소개하고, 그의 정량적 분석 방법을 한국어에 적용 할 수 있도록 수정하였으며, 교사의 실제 강의 내용을 분석하였다. 분석에 사용한 자료는 50분 동안 진행된 고등학교 1학년 생물 강의를 녹음한 것으로 소화에 관한 내용이었다. 강의 내용에서 역동적 구조의 정량적 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 강의는 316개의 담화단위 (discourse units) 로 구성되었으며. 261개의 어소 (verbal elements)가 동정되었다. 전체 강의에서 37개의 secondary span 이 동정되었고 이는 6개의 primary span으로 구분되었다. 전체 강의에 대한 평균 기본계수(mean fundamental coefficient, $\bar{B}_1$)는 0.26으로 낮은 수준의 연관도 (commonality )를 보였으며, 평균 가중 기본계수(mean weighted coefficient, $\bar{B}_2$)의 값은 0.88이었다. 전체적으로 이 강의는 중 내지 하 구조 (moderate to low structure)를 갖고 있으며, 높은 진행도 (high progression, $\bar{D}_s$=1.07)를 보였다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.439-460
• /
• 2019

In this study, we examined classroom interaction to explore the relationships among teacher questions, turn-taking patterns, and student talks in mathematics classrooms. We analyzed lessons given by three elementary teachers (two first-grade teachers and one second-grade teacher) who worked in the same school using a conversation-analytic approach. We observed individual classrooms three times in a year. The results revealed that when teachers provided open-ended questions, such as "why and how" questions and "agree and disagree" questions, and used a non-IRE pattern (teacher initiation-student response-teacher feedback; Mehan, 1979), students more actively engaged in classroom discourse by justifying their ideas and refuting others' thinking. Conversely, when teachers provided closed-ended questions, such as "what" questions, and used an IRE pattern, students tended to give short answers focusing on only one point. The findings suggested teachers should use open-ended questions and non-IRE turn-taking patterns to create an effective math-talk learning community. In addition, school administrators and mathematics educators should support teachers to acquire practical knowledge regarding this approach.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.34 no.5
• /
• pp.499-510
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this research is to understand interactive learning during docent-led tours in a science museum focusing on scaffolding. We developed a scaffolding framework by collating the work of other researchers in related fields. The results show that scaffolding included three dimensions: purpose, interaction, and domain. The purpose dimension, divided into six categories, is related to the intention of the scaffolder and what the scaffolding are for: strategic, social, procedural, conceptual, verbal, and metacognitive. The interaction dimension reflects students' interaction with the scaffolder in two ways: dynamic (situation specific) and static (planned in advance). The domain dimension is related to two contents: domain-general and domain-specific (such as science). The scaffolding framework was applied to dynamic interactions between docents and visitors. The data was collected from elementary school students' family visits with the guidance of two docents at the Seodaemun Museum of Natural History. The data collected consisted of surveys, interviews, video-recordings, and transcripts. The analysis shows that five guiding contexts and scaffolding phases were recognized; 1) strategic scaffolding in a poorly illustrated exhibit; 2) conceptual scaffolding in a thoroughly explanative exhibit; 3) verbal scaffolding in misleading interpretation; 4) procedural scaffolding in a manipulative exhibit; and 5) metacognitive scaffolding with inaccurate content. In addition, the results show that the docents used the dynamic and static scaffolding synthetically so that the docent-led tour was effective. In conclusion, this study presents the usefulness of understanding visitors' science learning through the scaffolding framework, as well as the how docents can scaffold actively.

• Journal of Korea Game Society
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2007

This paper attempts to analyze Starcraft by Greimas's Carre Semiotique and the theory of structure generation semiotics, which are useful for non verbal text as well as verbal text. First, by using the Christian Metz's grand syntagma theory and principle, this study articulated the text of starcraft. As a result, it revealed that Starcraft has the axis of sense of war and has the primary sense categories of production and destruction. The sense of the Starcraft is being generated by these axis of sense and sense categories. This analysis is expected to be a stepstone for the furthermore analysis of narrative and discoursive level.