• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Cognitive Science Conference
• /
• 2000.05a
• /
• pp.164-170
• /
• 2000

본 논문은 과거 많은 학자들에 의해 제기된 주구조와 부구조, 하위구조 등의 담화 내 계층적 구조에 대한 증거로 일탈을 중심으로 부구조를 분석하였다. 먼저 주제 일탈의 구조와 정의에 관해 분석하고 중단과 화제 전환 등과의 차이를 설명하였다. 지식 표현 언어인 Sowa의 개념구조론의 체계 내에서 담화의 계층적 구조와 그 구조를 나타내는 언어적 표시인 담화 표지의 예를 기술하는 방법을 제시한다. 개념 관계로 일탈, 화제 전환, 틀의 관계를 설정하여 담화 내 계층구조와 담화 부분과의 화용적인 관계를 규명하였다. 기존의 개념구조론은 선택적 제약, 조응 등의 의미론적인 개념들을 간결하고 정확하게 기술할 수 있었는데 화용론적인 측면의 기술도 가능함을 보여준다.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.11 no.3_4
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2000

The distinction between main structure and side structure in discourse which was central to narrative studies has lacked an adequate. formal definition. This study supports the contention that there exists a hierarchical structure between discourse units constituting main structures, substructures, and side structures. The aim of this study is twofold: (j) to present an adequate. formal definition that provides a general identification criterion for distinguishing main structure from substructure and side structure proposed by Kuppevelt, and (jj) to propose conceptual relations representing hierarchical structures in discourse based on Sowa's Conceptual Structure Theory. The proposed conceptual relations which represent hierarchy and pragmatic relations of discourse segments are: DIGR (digression). T-SHFT (topic shift), and FRAM (frame). This s study shows pragmatic functions can be incorporated within CST in a systematic way.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.8 no.7
• /
• pp.135-145
• /
• 2008

This paper tried to analyze Starcraft's multiplay by using especially Greimas's theory of discourse. Greimas's theory of semiotics is known as a useful tool of analyzing non-verbal text as well as verbal text. The discourse of Starcraft is continuously made by subject and anti-subject. This characteristic of discourse- not given completely made- is the prominent difference from discourses made from other media. The subject and anti-subject, as actively crossing the position of enunciator and enunciatee each other, dynamically make and complete the discourse.

• Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Korea Conference
• /
• 1998.08a
• /
• pp.419-424
• /
• 1998

담화 구조를 파악하기 위한 대표적인 방법으로 Litman과 Allen 의 계획 기법에 의한 것과 RDTN을 이용한 것을 들 수 있다. 그 중에서도 RDTN을 이용하여 대화의 흐름을 파악하려는 시도는 간단하며, 결정적이라는 장점이 있는 반면에 몇 가지 단점도 가지고 있다. RETN을 이용한 대화 분석의 가장 큰 단점은 정확히 분석된 화행을 입력으로 사용한다는 것이다. 즉, 현 상태에서 다음 상태로의 전이에 정의된 화행 이외의 화행이 입력으로 사용되면 분석을 실패하게 된다. 또 하나의 단점은 RDTN 이 어느정도 영역에 의존적인 특성을 보인다는 것이다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 확장성에 대한 문제점을 해결하고, 화행 분석의 어려움을 덜기 위해 신경망을 이용한 새로운 대화 전이망을 제안한다. 제안된 대화 전이 신경망은 지역적 대화 전이 신경망과 전역적 대화 전이 신경망은 이전의 두 발화와 현재 발화와의 관계를 살펴서 현재 발화가 이전 대화의 연속인지, 새로운 대화이 시작인지, 아니면 부대화의 시작인지를 결정하는 역할은 한다.전역적 대화전이 신경망은 담화 스택과의 상호 작용을 통해 담화의 전체구조를 살피고,전체 담화 구조에서 현재 발화가 어떤 역할을 하는지를 결정한다.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.203-222
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed the classroom discourse between teacher and students based on the Mehan(1979a)'s theory to examine the characteristics of the classroom discourse between teacher and students in high school statistics class. The results of this study on the structure of class showed that the statistics class in this study adopted knowledge transmission-oriented teacher-led class in which the framework of introductiondevelopment- arrangement, which is Mehan's basic 3 stages, is clearly represented. The results of examining I-R-E sequence showed that $I_T-R_T$ structure, in which the teacher asks questions and the teacher talks about the answer, frequently appeared. And the statistics class in this study was monological class in which students hardly participated. Through these results of this study, it was found that teacher should form the statistical context, in which students can participate in discourse, and build discourse learning community and induce argumentational discourse through metaprocess elicitation.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.28 no.8
• /
• pp.832-847
• /
• 2008

This study aims to provide a cornerstone for 'Pedagogical Discourse Analysis' by connecting linguistic theory to science education practice. Pedagogical Discourse Analysis (PDA) focuses its attention on finding educational implications beyond description on classroom language. This study is specially aimed at PDA in terms of the textual aspect, which has not sparked interest in science classroom discourse. For this, we supposed that the framework of PDA composed of two axes: 'thematic flow' and 'information flow'. We presented a case of science classroom discourse in terms of PDA to investigate opportunities in its potential and utilities. This trial crosses the line of traditional science classroom discourse analysis, which has been inclined to linguistics theory. It will also suggest a new horizon for science classroom discourse in an educational context.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.69-92
• /
• 2005

A brief survey of linguistic studies on the nature of contrastive information in discourse was Presented first, and an attempt was also made to incorporate the Linguistic theories and concepts about contrast in discourse into a psychological framework. A tentative model of processing of contrastive information in discourse was Proposed, and eight experimental studies on the effects of contrastive information on comprehension and memory of short and ions discourses were reviewed. Experimental results showed that contrastive sentences took more time to process at encoding, and yet were recognized faster and cued-recalled in greater amount than noncontrastive sentences. It was also found that levels of contrast in the discourse structure have some effects on encoding time. It was further found that the sentence immediately following the contrastive sentence was processed slowly regardless of whether it does or does not resolve the contrast. The implications of the results of empirical studies were discussed in relation to developing a research framework that integrate coherence studies and contrast studies urns the two disciplines of linguistics and cognitive psychology.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.487-509
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to analyze classroom discourse in the math classroom of middle school in China, which has a unique math classroom background of entrance examination for high school. To this end, this study analyzed teacher question statistics and episodes by teacher question type as starting speech in mathematics classroom discourse, and five IRF subtypes were especially identified by class discourse structure analysis. The data were analyzed focusing on a total of 15 transcripts of math classes recorded by three math teachers at H School in Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China, and written interviews of teachers. According to the results of this study, an average of 20 teacher questions were observed for each class, and the teacher question type was classified into confirmation question (understanding confirmation question, explanation request question, and double check question) and information question (information presentation question). In addition, according to classroom discourse analysis, the IRF discourse structure was divided into fragmentary evaluation, evaluation+reason, evidence of explanation, evaluation+student response re-statement, guidance on other thoughts or solutions, and student answer correction or teacher opinion presentation.

• 한국어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2016.10a
• /
• pp.33-38
• /
• 2016

수사구조는 텍스트의 각 구성 성분이 맺고 있는 관계를 의미하며, 필자의 의도는 논리적인 구조를 통해서 독자에게 더 잘 전달될 수 있다. 따라서 독자의 인지적 효과를 극대화할 수 있도록 수사구조를 고려하여 단락과 문장 구조를 구성하는 것이 필요하다. 그럼에도 불구하고 지금까지 수사구조에 기초한 한국어 분류체계를 만들거나 주석 코퍼스를 설계하려는 시도가 없었다. 본 연구에서는 기존 수사구조 이론을 기반으로, 한국어 보도문 형식에 적합한 30개 유형의 분류체계를 정제하고 최소 담화 단위별로 태깅한 코퍼스를 구축하였다. 또한 구축한 코퍼스를 토대로 중심문장을 비롯한 문장 구조의 특징과 분포 비율, 신문기사의 장르적 특성 등을 살펴봄으로써 텍스트에서 응집성의 실현 양상과 구문상의 특징을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 한국어 담화 구문에 적합한 수사구조 분류체계를 설계하고 이를 이용한 주석 코퍼스를 최초로 구축하였다는 점에서 의의를 갖는다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.840-862
• /
• 2013

This study undertook a methodological investigation on previous research that had proposed alternative methods for analyzing argumentative discourse in science classes in terms of collaborative construction and epistemic enactments of argumentation. The study also proposed a new way of analyzing argumentation discourse based on the achievements and limitations of previous research. The new method was applied to actual argumentation discourse episodes to examine its feasibility. For these purposes, we chose the studies employing Toulmin's argument layout, seeking for a method to analyze comprehensively the structure, content, and justification of arguments, or emphasizing evidence-based reasoning processes of argumentation discourse. In addition, we contrived an alternative method of analyzing argumentative discourse, Discourse Register on the Evidence-Explanation Continuum (DREEC), and applied DREEC to an argumentative discourse episode that occurred in an actual science classroom. The advanced methods of analyzing argumentative discourse used in previous research usually examined argument structure by the presence and absence of the elements of Toulmin's argument layout or its extension. Those methods, however, had some problems in describing and comparing the quality of argumentation based on the justification and epistemic enactments of the arguments, while they could analyze and compare argumentative discourse quantitatively. Also, those methods had limitations on showing participants' collaborative construction during the argumentative discourse. In contrast, DREEC could describe collaborative construction through the relationships between THEMEs and RHEMEs and the links of data, evidence, pattern, and explanation in the discourse, as well as the justification of arguments based on the flow of epistemic enactments of the argumentative discourse.