• Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2002

목적 급성 허혈성 뇌졸중에서 관류 MR영상으로 측정한 상대적 뇌혈용적과 단광자방출전산화단층촬영으로 측정한 상대적 뇌혈류량이 나중에 발생할 뇌경색을 예측할 수 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 급성 일측성 중대뇌동맥 폐색 환자에서 증상 발생 6시간 이내에 관류 MR영상과 99mTc-HMPAO 단광자방출전산화단층촬영을 모두 시행한 13명을 대상으로 하였다. 동맥 폐색에 의한 허혈 부위와 반대측 정상 부위에서 각 관류 변수를 측정하여 그 비(허혈 부위 관류변수 값 / 정상 부위 관류 변수 값)를 구한 후, 나중에 경색으로 이행할 부위와 그렇지 않을 부위를 판별할 수 있는 관류변수 비의 절단값을 계산하였다. 결과 : 경색으로 이행한 부위와 그렇지 않은 부위에서 상대적 뇌혈용적 비의 평균값은 각각 $0.58{\pm}0.27{\;}and{\;}0.99{\pm}0.17$ (p<0.001)이었고, 상대적 뇌혈류량 비의 평균 값은 $0.41{\pm}0.22{\;}and{\;}0.71{\pm}0.14$ (p<0.001)이었다. 경색으로 이행할 부위와 그렇지 않을 부위를 판별하는 절단값은 상대적 뇌혈용적 비가 0.80, 상대적 뇌혈류량 비가 0.56이었다. 각 절단값의 민감도, 특이도, 능률은 뇌혈용적 비가 80.6, 87.5, 82.7%이었고 상대적 뇌혈류량 비가 72.2, 75.0, 73.0%이었다. (두 관류변수 사이에서 p>0.05). 결론 : 급성 허혈성 뇌졸중에서 상대적 뇌혈용적과 상대적 뇌혈류량의 측정은 뇌경색의 발생을 예측하는 데에 유용한 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.135-143
• /
• 2022

In SPECT image, scatter count is the cause of quantitative count error and image quality degradation. This study is to evaluate the accuracy of CT based SC(CTSC) and energy window based SC(EWSC) as the comparison with existing Non SC. SPECT/CT images were obtained after filling air in order to acquire a reference image without the influence of scatter count inside the Triple line insert phantom setting hot rod(^99mTc 74.0 MBq) in the middle and each SPECT/CT image was obtained each separately after filling water instead of air in order to derive the influence of scatter count under the same conditions. For EWSC, 9 sub-energy windows were set additionally in addition to main energy window(140 keV, 20%) and then, images were acquired at the same time and five types of EWSC including DPW(dual photo-peak window)10%, DEW(dual energy window)20%, TEW(triple energy window)10%, TEW5.0%, TEW2.5% were used. Under the condition without fluctuations in primary count, total count was measured by drawing volume of interest (VOI) in the images of the two conditions and then, the ratio of scatter count of total counts was calculated as percent scatter fraction(%SF) and the count error with image filled with water was evaluated with percent normalized mean-square error(%NMSE) based on the image filled with air. Based on the image filled with air, %SF of images filled with water to which each SC method was applied is non scatter correction(NSC) 37.44, DPW 27.41, DEW 21.84, TEW10% 19.60, TEW5% 17.02, TEW2.5% 14.68, CTSC 5.57 and the scatter counts were removed the most in CTSC and %NMSE is NSC 35.80, DPW 14.28, DEW 7.81, TEW10% 5.94, TEW5% 4.21, TEW2.5% 2.96, CTSC 0.35 and the error in CTSC was found to be the lowest. In SPECT/CT images, the application of each scatter correction method used in the experiment could improve the quantitative count error caused by the influence of scatter count. In particular, CTSC showed the lowest %NMSE(=0.35) compared to existing EWSC methods, enabling relatively accurate scatter correction.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.645-653
• /
• 2021

With the recent development of precision medicine(Theranostics), interest and utilization of the quantitative function of SPECT/CT are increasing. This study aims to investigate the effect on the radioactivity concentration estimate by the increase or decrease in the total time of SPECT/CT imaging conditions. A standard image was obtained by the conditions of a total acquisition time of 600 sec(10 sec/f × 120 frames) by diluting ^99mTc 91.76 MBq in a cylindrical phantom filled with sterile water, and a comparative image was obtained by increasing the total acquisition time by -90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%. The CNR, radioactive concentration estimate(cps/ml), and the variation rate(%) of the recovery coefficient(RC) were analyzed by measuring the overall coefficient of interest in each image. The results[CNR, Radiation Concentration, RC] by the change in the number of projections for each increase or decrease rate(-90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%) of total acquisition time are as follows. [-89.5%, +3.90%, 1.04] at -90%, [-77.9%, +2.71%, 1.03] at -75%, [-55.6%, +1.85%, 1.02] at -50%, [-33.6%, +1.37%, 1.01] at -25%, [-33.7%, +0.71%, 1.01] at +50%, [+93.2%, +0.32%, 1.00] at +100%. and also The results[CNR, Radiation Concentration, RC] by the acquisition time change for each increase or decrease rate(-90%, -75%, -50%, -25%, +50%, +100%) of total acquisition time are as follows. [-89.3%, -3.55%, 0.96] at -90%, [-73.4%, -0.17%, 1.00] at -75%, [-49.6%, -0.34%, 1.00] at -50%, [-24.9%, 0.03%, 1.00] at -25%, [+49.3%, -0.04%, 1.00] at +50%, [+99.0%, +0.11%, 1.00] at +100%. Image quality(CNR) showed a pattern of change in proportion to the increase or decrease in the total acquisition time of SPECT/CT, but the result at quantitative evaluation showed a change of less than 5% in all experimental conditions, maintaining quantitative accuracy(RC less than 0.05) without much influence.