• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
• /
• 2014.05a
• /
• pp.302-303
• /
• 2014

The green building certification criteria in detached houses in 2012 and it included in the green building certification subject. However, the green building certification result of the detached houses is slight after revising of the system. Therefore, in this research, we were performed the importance analysis for the green building certification assessment of the detached houses. The results of this study will contribute to the green building certification work.

• Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
• /
• v.34 no.9
• /
• pp.67-76
• /
• 2018

The improvements of G-SEED standards was studies in this research by comparing the composition, rating scores, and standards, including categories, issues and criteria of BREEAM in the UK. In this research, it was found that both certification systems had very similar composition and rating system, however, there was slight difference in the points of emphasizing the standards due to the differences in social awareness of green buildings in each country. As a result of the detailed comparison of both standards, in addition, it was found that almost half of criteria had different evaluation approaches such as evaluation methods and scopes between both standards even though they had same evaluation objectives; some of the differences were due to the social or cultural differences between the countries, and the others were not. Through the research, we were able to derive some criteria that need for improvements of G-SEED considering the domestic conditions in Korea.

• Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society
• /
• v.36 no.5
• /
• pp.9-18
• /
• 2016

G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) is the certification system to evaluate environmental friendliness of buildings for the purpose of reducing environmental burden generated from the entire process of buildings, which is classified into 4 grades according to the evaluated score. Green building certification rule regulate to get over green 2nd grade for the public office buildings of $3000m^2$ or more. However, detailed measures on the applied level of each issue to obtain targeted certification grade have not been prepared yet. For each issue, the score distribution and the ratio of score in proportion to credit were analyzed by certification grade for office buildings which get the G-SEED certification. And applied level of issues were presented for each certification grade.

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.11 s.283
• /
• pp.14-17
• /
• 1992

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.42 no.6
• /
• pp.18-25
• /
• 2013

• The Science & Technology
• /
• s.547
• /
• pp.46-51
• /
• 2014

• Bulletin of Korea Environmental Preservation Association
• /
• s.384
• /
• pp.19-25
• /
• 2009

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture Conference
• /
• 2016.03a
• /
• pp.27-28
• /
• 2016

• The Magazine of the Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea
• /
• v.42 no.9
• /
• pp.18-26
• /
• 2013

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• v.13 no.6
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2013

Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) has been used for environmental friendly building certification since 2002. The certification criteria initialed with multi-residential building and now it expands to 10 criteria for new and existing building types. The purpose of this study is to understand current recognition of G-SEED from the survey of multi-complex residences in newtown. From the general question, 75.2% of responders answered the period of living term between 1~3 years, 58.6% lived in $102.48{\sim}132.23m^2$ residential area and 65.2% owned their residences. The 43.2% of respondents recognized that their residences gained G-SEED certification by G-SEED emblem(31.6%). This is the significant meaning to understand public recognition of G-SEED and how to approach the strategy for raising the G-SEED recognition. The responders expected positive influence for economical value from G-SEED and also 75.3% of responders agreed with that G-SEED would be a decision make to buy and rent their residences. Second, residents responded that the consideration issue for green building is energy & prevention of environmental pollution(27.7%) which carries equal concern in G-SEED criteria category. The result of this survey verifies that the current level recognition of G-SEED of the responder's perspectives still is not well-known but it confirmed they have a positive expectation. Therefore, from this result, G-SEED needs to draw road map with detail plans for developing G-SEED with public participation.