• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.06a
• /
• pp.518-524
• /
• 2008

경영환경이 개별기업간의 경쟁에서 기업집단 군의 경쟁으로 변화하여 감으로써 기업간 협력의 중요성이 점차 커지고 있다. 많은 선행 연구들이 기업간 협력의 중요성을 강조하고 있으나, 기업의 오랜 역사적 경험 속에서 생겨나는 정보기술 활용 능력과 사회자본이 기업간 협력에 미치는 영향에 대해서는 명확하게 설명하지 못하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 기업간 협력의 촉진요인과 성과와의 관계를 알아보고자 하였다. 기업간 협력의 촉진 요인으로 제시된 정보기술의 활용능력과 함께 사회 자본을 추가로 제안하고, 이들이 기업간 협력을 강화해서 기업의 성과에 공헌한다는 것을 실증하여 보고자 하였다. 실증분석결과 기업의 정보기술 활용능력은 정보공유활동과 사회자본에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있으며, 사회자본이 기업간 협업활동에 영향을 미쳐 기업성과를 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 자원기반관점에서 기업간 협력을 촉진하는 정보기술 활용능력과 사회자본이 기업간 관계 유지와 기업의 성과에 크게 공헌하고 있으며, 기업의 중요한 무형의 자산으로써 경쟁력의 원천이 되고 있음을 의미 한다고 할 수 있다.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.129
• /
• pp.32-33
• /
• 2009

오늘날과 같은 글로벌 경쟁시대에 대기업과 중소기업의 협력은 기업네트워크를 통한 경쟁력 강화 방안의 핵심요소라 할 수 있다. 최근 대기업과 중소기업 상호 모두에게 도움이 되는 호혜적 협력사업을 성공적으로 추진하고 있는 전경련중소기업협력센터(이하 '협력센터')는 중소기업 경영자문 활동을 통해 상생협력 인프라를 구축함과 동시에 중소기업의 경쟁력 강화에도 이바지 하고 있다. 이러한 상생협력 모범사례 중 지난 3월 대기업 협력업체의 경영혁신전략 구축을 위한 '경영닥터제' 발대식 현장을 소개하고자 한다.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.119-137
• /
• 2019

This paper analyzes the factors affecting the relationship characteristics of firms and public research institutes, in-addition to analyzing the effect of relationship characteristics with the industry-public research institute cooperation. We selected factors influencing relationship characteristics of firms and public research institutes based on the study of existing industry-university-institute cooperation. These factors include the willingness of the industry-public research institute cooperation, firm's R&D capabilities, and the firm's perceived public research institutes competence. The relationship between these factors, their relationship characteristics, and the performance of the industry-public research institute cooperation was studied using six hypotheses. In order to test this research model, we conducted a survey on industry-public research institute cooperation firms and received responses from 116 companies. Partial Least Square-Multi Group Analysis (PLS-MGA) was used to test the research model. The results of the empirical analysis show the following results. First, the willingness of the industry-public research institute cooperation, firm's R&D capabilities and firm's perceived public research institutes competence have a positive impact on the relationship characteristics of firms and public research institutes. Second, the relationship characteristics of firms and public research institutes have a positive impact on firm performance in the industry-public research institute cooperation. Third, firm's R&D capabilities and firm's perceived public research institutes competence directly affect firm performance in the industry-public research institute cooperation. These results provide policy and practical implications for enhancing firm performance of the industry-public research institute cooperation.

• Journal of Information Technology and Architecture
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.199-207
• /
• 2012

This study analyzed how the subcontracting business relations and structures of cooperation affect the relationship skills (Outcome) that is divided into three steps. We analyzed integrated data every other year from 2005 to 2009. As a results, in the execution of technical cooperation trade relations have influenced the positive attributes, but recently their influence has been weakened. As for technical cooperation, the structure should alleviate the problem of the uneven performance of technical cooperation. We suggested that technical expertise and infrastructure make possible the culmination of the long-term technological competitiveness level.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.416-445
• /
• 2019

This study aims at examining the relationship among entrepreneurial orientation, absorption capability, alliance capability and cooperation performance in technological cooperation between SMEs and government-funded R&D Institutes. For empirical analysis, the study conducted a survey on total 2,895 SMEs participating in the technological cooperation programs operated by government-funded R&D Institutes, and collected 332 survey responses. Data were analysed using a structural equation model. Empirical results show that entrepreneurial orientation, absorption capability, and alliance capability influenced the performance of technological cooperation. In addition, alliance capability has a significant effect on absorptive capacity. In order for the technology cooperation between SMEs and government-funded research institutes being successful, efforts are needed to secure companies' entrepreneurial orientation, absorption capability and alliance capability that has the capabilities that SMEs needs for technological cooperation.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 1998.10a
• /
• pp.193-196
• /
• 1998

효율적인 글로벌 생산경영은 각국에 위치한 생산시설을 통제·운영(control)해야 하는 글로벌 기업(다국적기업)에게 중요한 문제가 되고 있다. 각 나라에 위치한 생산시설은 글로벌기업의 생산네트워크를 구성하는데, 효율적인 글로벌 생산경영을 위해서는 이러한 글로벌 생산네트워크가 최적으로 운영되어야 한다. 글로벌기업은 협력·조정 메커니즘(coordination mechanism)을 통하여 이를 달성할 수 있다. 글로벌 협력·조정 메커니즘(global coordination mechanism)이란 글로벌 기업의 본사와 해외자회사 모두의 생산활동에 상호 영향을 미치는 의사결정을 하는데 있어서 서로 협력하고 조정할 수 있도록 해주는 조직적 의사결정지원 시스템의 하나이다. 이는 협력·조정의 영역, 방법, 구조 등 세가지 기본 틀을 살펴봄으로써 이해될 수 있다는 것이 본 논문의 기본 전제이다. 이 논문에서는 한국 글로벌기업의 본사와 해외 자회사간 협력·조정 활동을 분석하여, 해외 자회사의 생산성과를 높이기 위한 효과적인 협력·조정 메커니즘의 결정요소를 파악하고자 한다. 실증분석을 통하여 다음과 같은 가설을 검증한다. (1) 산업의 특성은 협력·조정 메커니즘과 글로벌 생산성과 간의 상호관계에 영향을 미친다. (2) 글로벌기업의 특성(예를 들어, 기업의 글로벌화 정도, 규모)은 협력·조정 메커니즘과 글로벌 생산성과 간의 상호관계에 영향을 미친다. (3) 산업과 기업의 특성을 반영하여 협력·조정 메커니즘의 구성요소 (협력·조정 영역, 방법, 및 구조) 간의 적합성(fit)이 이루어졌을 때 글로벌 생산성과는 가장 높다.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.457-464
• /
• 2005

경쟁이 점점 더 치열해 지는 시장 상황에서 기업의 생존이 경영의 목표가 되어지고 있고 기업이 독자적으로 생존하기는 거의 불가능해지고 있다. 이제는 기업 간 협력만이 생존의 열쇠이며 협력을 위하여 제반의 경영체제를 정비해야 한다. 본 연구는 고객과의 접점에 있는 대기업과 협력을 할 중소기업 간의 정보를 이용한 협력 방안을 실제 사례를 중심으로 정리를 하고 있다. 본 연구의 배경이 되는 프로젝트에서는 모기업과 실제로 거래를 하는 중소협력사들의 정보화 현황 분석, 협력의 조건 분석 및 방안 정립, 협력체제의 수립 등의 작업을 진행하였고, 수백의 협력사와 동시에 정보 협력시스템을 구축하였다. 이 프로젝트의 경험을 바탕으로 본 연구는 수행되어졌으므로 B2B 협력체계 수립을 필요로 하는 기업의 입장에서 활용하는데에 도움이 될 것으로 판단된다.

• The Journal of Small Business Innovation
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.57-74
• /
• 2016

This paper analyzes the role of strategic fit, cooperation, and performance in small-sized subpart suppliers' interactions with large businesses. For this purpose, this paper analyzes survey data from 90 first-tier suppliers of Samsung Electronics and evaluates how strategic fit and cooperative relationships affect their performance. Empirical analysis suggests that strategic fit positively affects small companies' business and innovation performance. This finding aligns with theories arguing for strategies that accommodate specific business environments. In addition, strategic fit is crucial for innovativeness of SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises). With regard to forming relationships with large companies, findings also show that high quality technological and personnel cooperation boosts subpart suppliers' productivity and efficiency as notably reflected in SMEs' business performance. Moreover, such cooperation between small and large companies reinforces the benefits associated with strategic fit and innovation. This means that if the business environment of small-sized subpart suppliers is uncertain, harnessing differentiated strategies and pursuing collaborations with prime companies will produce innovative outcomes (e.g., increased patent publications). On the other hand, when degree of uncertainty is small, pursuing cost leadership strategies and collaborating with prime companies in areas, such as technology and personnel, will help small-sized subpart suppliers produce innovative outcomes. Based on these findings, this paper argues that choosing the right competitive strategy for a specific business context is intrinsically tied to (1) augmenting technological and human collaborations with prime companies, (2) improving the quality of these interactions, and (3) generating competitiveness among small subpart suppliers. Both competition and cooperation are necessary for strengthening the competitiveness of small companies.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.215-224
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to investigate the external collaboration factors that affect the performance of Korean venture businesses. We use 1,567 firm data (from Venture Business Survey by Small & Medium Business Administration) and analyze the effect of the external collaborations with large business, research institutions, other small business, and foreign companies, on their sales increase between 2008 and 2009. Our analysis shows that Korean venture business' collaborations with research institutions or foreign companies increase their sales statistically significantly, while their collaborations with large business decrease their sales significantly. In the mean time, their collaborations with other small businesses show no significant result. Additional analysis on the collaboration categories between venture businesses and large businesses shows that collaborative R&D, employee training and collaborative marketing help venture business to increase their sales significantly, while financial collaborations have a significant negative effect on sales increase. Technology transfers and profit-sharing mechanism have no significant effect. The result shows that venture business' collaborations for the increase in the fundamental capability of innovations and for searching new markets rather than simple transfer of technology or financial collaborations, have significant positive effects on the increase in sales.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.15 no.3
• /
• pp.533-556
• /
• 2012

The paper analyzes the effects of Korean venture businesses' external collaborations on their innovation performances, according to their collaboration partners and collaboration activities. The results show that the collaborations between Korean venture businesses and research institutions, and those between venture businesses and other venture businesses have significant positive effects on venture businesses' innovation performances, in terms of the numbers of the intellectual property rights, while the collaborations between venture businesses and large companies have significant positive effects on medium-sized venture businesses only. In addition, collaborative research and development, and technology transfer from big companies to venture businesses have given significant positive effects on venture businesses' innovation performances, while collaborative employee training and collaborative marketing have given significant negative effects on venture businesses' innovation performances. Furthermore, collaborations between large companies and their subcontracting venture businesses have shown even more significant effects on venture businesses' performances. The results show that the effectiveness of external collaborations of Korean venture businesses depends on collaboration partners, types of collaboration activities, and the size of collaborating venture businesses, implying that government programs for encouraging venture businesses to collaborate with external institutions should be carefully chosen for their innovation performance improvement.