• Proceedings of the Korea Database Society Conference
• /
• 1997.10a
• /
• pp.438-454
• /
• 1997

본 논문에서는 정보기술을 활용하고자 하는 정부 관리자들의 보다 전술적인 문제로써 정보 기술사업의 선정방안에 대해서 미국 뉴욕주의 사례를 중심으로 논하였다. 뉴욕주의 정보기술사업 선정에 대한 분석은 선정절차, 선정기준, 평점방법, 그리고 선정조직의 측면에서 이루어졌다. 뉴욕주 기술사업 선정은 평가절차가 정확성에 보다 치중하고 있으며, 평가기준도 제안조직의 능력보다는 제안된 사업의 개발로 인한 영향 평가에 초점을 두고 있다. 평점모형에서는 구체적인 가중치를 부여하여 계량화하기보다는 영향의 (+)와 (-)를 밝히고 있다. 평가조직은 내ㆍ외부 전문가를 충분히 혼합하여 활용하고 있다. 이러한 특징은 의사결정의 문화성, 합리성, 그리고 합법성의 측면에서 다시 논의되었다. 뉴욕주정부의 정보 기술 사업 선정과정에서의 특징이 정보정책에 갖는 함의 또한 논의되었다.

• Environmental engineer
• /
• v.23 s.234
• /
• pp.42-43
• /
• 2006

• Journal of the Korean Professional Engineers Association
• /
• v.31 no.5
• /
• pp.60-68
• /
• 1998

• Environmental engineer
• /
• s.170
• /
• pp.36-39
• /
• 2000

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.15 no.2 s.152
• /
• pp.20-29
• /
• 2005

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.11 no.3 s.129
• /
• pp.41-52
• /
• 2001

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.13 no.5 s.143
• /
• pp.2-17
• /
• 2003

• Science & Technology Policy
• /
• v.10 no.2 s.122
• /
• pp.56-64
• /
• 2000

• Clean Technology
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.13-23
• /
• 1999

The unique method for evaluating the environmental impact, which is restricted to use in BS7750, was performed to determine the priority for reducing environmental loads in the cement process. Mass balance in the unit process was achieved, it was utilized to introduce the matrix method which are composed of two different evaluation's criteria by occurrence possibility and by occurrence results. The purpose of this paper is first to explain the matrix method in the practical plant and secondly to show the successful examples of enviromental improvement. Conclusively, the seriousness of environmental impact could be quantified in several different unit processes and suggested some progressive results obtained after process improvement.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.1-39
• /
• 2013

This article explores the risk governance of nanotechnology in Korea in light of a regulatory law approach, a soft law approach, and a participatory governance approach. The risk governance of nanotechnology in Korea has three characteristics. First, there are many existing regulatory laws that can be applied to the regulation of nanotechnology. However, these laws have exemptions, the extent of which are larger than that of the Europe and the United States. Second, the soft law approach is the most prevalent risk policy in Korea at present, but is limited because it is being driven by the government without active, voluntary participation of relevant companies. Third, no case of participatory governance took place when it comes to nanotechnology technology assessment. As policy recommendations to improve Korean nanotechnology risk governance, this article suggests pre-market screening, mandatory governmental registration of nanomaterials, transition management of code of conduct, and the design of interdisciplinary research and development project for real-time technology assessment.