• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.9-23
• /
• 2005

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.1-30
• /
• 2018

This study examines the major changes of research about science and technology administrative system and innovation governance, and suggests future direction through critical review. The subjects of the analysis are papers of such as Korean Public Administration Review, Journal of Technology Innovation and policy reports and government documents published by national research institutes. As a result of the analysis, the research itself has evolved from the part of the government organization to the unique field and main focused historical, normative, comparative analysis and institutional approach. In addition, coordination and integration of science and technology policies have been regarded as important issues in research, and innovation system (NIS) and governance perspectives have begun to be reflected in research. However, it reveals some issues such as small government theory vs big government theory, governance theory vs control tower theory, and shows limitations in problem definition and solution inconsistency, and lack of grand and detailed discourse. Future challenges include the pursuit of evolutionary rationality, the pursuit of diversity in multidimensional research and methods, development of korean policy theory and securing universality.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2023

This study proposes an integrated use of region and industry as a way to classify firms' innovation activities by type. Existing studies have used the method of determining innovative activities according to the components of the technological regimes and aggregating them by industry classification, but this method cannot fully reflect the heterogeneity within industries in an increasingly sophisticated innovation environment. Therefore, this study divides firms by region and industry and conducts a cluster analysis on the proportion of innovative activities by the components of the technological regimes to derive a total of four innovation types. Using the 2016 Korean Innovation Survey to classify innovation types in the manufacturing industry, we found that innovation activities are concentrated in Seoul, Busan, Incheon, and Chungnam/ Sejong/ Daejeon area, with different deviations by region and industry. The results of the aggregation of industrial innovation activities, weighted by corporate activity by region, show that the level of innovation activity in some manufacturing industries, such as petrochemicals, manufacturing of medical, precision and optical instruments, watches and clocks, is high, but the level of innovation in other sectors within the manufacturing industry is generally low.

• 혁신정책Brief
• /
• s.20
• /
• pp.3-27
• /
• 2006

• The Optical Journal
• /
• s.110
• /
• pp.70-72
• /
• 2007

외국 기술을 모방하여 그 궤적을 따라가는 추격형 기술혁신모델의 한계가 노정되면서 새로운 기술혁신모델의 필요성이 증대하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 모방에 의거한 추격형 혁신활동을 넘어서는 탈추격형(post catch-up)기술혁신활동의 특성을 조감하는 작업을 수행했다. 특히 분석대상을 중소기업에 맞추어져 이들의 탈추격형 혁신활동 사례를 살펴보았다. 기술집약형 중소기업의 혁신활동의 활성화는 그 자체가 대기업 중심의 한국혁신체제의 전환을 보여주는 의미 있는 현상이기 때문이다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.79-90
• /
• 2004

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.13-19
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 방위산업기술보호법 제정에 따른 국가혁신체제로의 방위산업기술보호 방안을 살펴본다. 특히, 본 연구는 많은 시간과 노력을 통해 개발한 연구개발의 성과를 어떻게 보호해야 할지 측면에서 분석한다. 국내외 기술보호 법령, 조직 등 분석을 통한 시사점을 도출하고 국가혁신체제 관점에서 3가지 개선방안을 제시한다. 전문인력의 단계적 확충 및 전문지원 기관 설립, 효율적인 실태조사 방안 그리고 국가혁신체제 차원에서의 기술보호인식의 전환을 제시한다. 효율적인 방위산업기술보호체계 구축을 위해서 가장 중요한 것은 방위산업기술을 보유한 대상기관 최고책임자(CEO)의 의지이다. 영세한 기업의 경우는 기술보호를 위한 자원의 할당이 쉽지 않기 때문에 CEO가 기술보호에 대한 투자의 중요함을 인식하는 것이 중요하다. 이를 위해서 정부는 지속적으로 기술보호의 중요성에 대한 홍보를 강화하고, 제도적으로 울타리에 들어올 수 있도록 하고, 중소기업의 경우 기술보호체계 구축 등을 우선적으로 지원해야 한다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.332-364
• /
• 2010

External linkages affect the performance of small and medium enterprises in diverse ways. This study delves into the impact of inter-organizational collaboration by looking at different facets of performance, such as innovation, sales growth, profit growth, and firm survival. In addition, it explores the influence of informal knowledge spillover from collaborative partners as well as from formal collaborations. The impact is carefully investigated by dividing firm samples into three different sectoral innovation categories: supplier-dominant, production-intensive, and science-based sector suggested by Pavitt (1984). The result highlights the different influence pattern of collaborative relations by partner types according to sectoral categories. The positive results of collaborating with universities and public institutions are identified, and the sales growth by customer linkage is witnessed. The impact is apparent in science-based sectors. The result implies that the risk associated with collaborating with competitors may be moderated by linking performance enhancing collaborative linkages with universities and government institutes.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.861-882
• /
• 2013

This study analyses interorganizational innovation networks empirically in the Korean biotechnology industry, based on systems of innovation approach. Empirical findings of this study are as follows. Innovation networks have not been well developed in the Korean biotechnology industry. Main agents who participate in innovation networks are workers at venture firms, university professors, researchers at government-sponsored research institutions. They all recognize the positive effects of innovation networks. The enhancement of participation willingness and competency of agents, the enrichment of trust and control among agents, and the effective acquisition of the useful technology and resources in innovation networks will largely contribute to development of innovation networks in the Korean biotechnology industry.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2015.11a
• /
• pp.806-806
• /
• 2015