• Journal of the KSME
• /
• v.44 no.7
• /
• pp.34-45
• /
• 2004

우리는 일상적인 대화에서 '과학적'이라는 수식어를 '믿음직한', '체계적인', '참된' 등을 의미하도록 사용하는 경우가 많다 .다른 누구보다도 광고 제작자들은 이 사실을 잘 알고 있다. 그래서 우리는 '과학적으로 설계되고 만들어진 침대' 정도로는 부족해서 아예, '침대가 아니라 과학입니다'라는 식의 광고문구에 어느덧 익숙하게 되었다. 침대를 광고하는 것이 분명한데도 침대가 아니라는 이 역설적인 주장에는 그냥 적당히(\ulcorner) 나무를 깎고 용수철을 달아 침대를 만든 것이 아니라 수많은 경험적 연구와 객관적 사용 테스트를 거쳐서 가장 편안하게 잠을 잘 수 있도록 침대를 만들었음을 강조하려는 의도가 숨어있을 것이다.(중략)

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.147
• /
• pp.239-260
• /
• 2018

Is an artificial intelligence robot, a non-human beings newly emerging in the age of technology, a threat to human beings, or a mutual cooperation or ensemble with human beings? The desire to control nature through the use of the power of science and technology is manifested in the fear that humans can annihilate themselves. This study attempts to identify the problems of Cartesian epistemology underlying these questions and fears and to answer these questions based on Merleau - Ponty 's ontological ontology using the Ontology and Latour' s ontology and technological philosophy. The cogito derived from the Cartesian philosophy became the basis of the structure of dichotomous epistemology of 'subjectivity and objectivity' based on human - reason. In the human-centered world, all non-human beings were tools or controls for humans. The problem of the modern people is not only to get help from the natural scientific methods to control the nature including man, but also to think that scientific method is the only way to understand the world. In criticizing this, Merleau-Ponty shows that the body mediates between human beings and non-human beings, and provides a possible ontological basis for the ontology. Merleau - Ponty 's phenomenological methodology and ontology are newly developed by Simondon under the influence of phenomenological philosopher and phenomenology. The relationship between human beings and nonhuman beings by Simondon appears as an ensemble of human and technical objects or a mutual co - operation of human and technical objects. In particular, Latour goes a step further in Simondon and defines all the bodies living in the world as actor-network theory, denying the core concept of modernity. Merleau - Ponty 's phenomenological view can be a new possible basis for the philosophical discussion of the technological age. We will see that the problem itself can be solved by shifting modern fear to a phenomenological attitude.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.1-15
• /
• 2020

This study was performed to derive a new business administration framework based on the service philosophy established in the previous research. We proposed a business administration system that reflects the changes of modern economic society and solves problems of existing business administration. The problem of the existing business administration is analyzed by analyzing the essential problems of business administration as a discipline and the practical problems of current business administration. New management theory must have a status as an intrinsic discipline, so it must meet the common principles of human society. The principles of universe and the life principle of mankind, which are the environment in which human beings live, were reflected. As a result of deriving these common principles, qualification requirements as the intrinsic disciplines of business administration can be defined. The new business administration discipline is constructed in three fields. Business philosophy, a theory of manager, and business administration skills are three sub-fields of new business administration. We define the detailed structure of each field of new business administration and present the main research topics. In the future, further research is needed to deepen the culture of essence in business administration, and it is necessary to study the construction of the new business administration theory in detailed field.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.137
• /
• pp.383-407
• /
• 2016

Considering the long time that modern man has been autonomous, it can be said that the brutal human violence prevalent around the globe today is an 'exceptional situation'. Behavior such as killing animals or devastating the natural environment are thought to be unavoidable. However, if human beings have been 'social animals' pursuing connectedness and seeking meaning in the relationships of others beyond themselves since the beginning of time, how can the incredibly powerful violence which humankind has inflicted on plants, other animals, or the earth itself be explained? With this in mind, I propose the following arguments. First, the crisis of consciousness in the loss of hope for the future of mankind under the technology of modern Western civilization has already come to a dead-end causing Western philosophers to think of ways to discover new opportunities, apparent as ecology and ecological philosophy. Second, as reality has become governed by the technology of modern Western civilization and ecological philosophical rationality fails to co-exist with this reality, an understanding of ecological philosophy should be deepened and continued. In this context, I will investigate the existential conditions for human life to continue in the future in consideration of ecological philosophy and the meaning of Forest.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.43
• /
• pp.33-53
• /
• 2014

It's the situation that modern technological civilization shakes the life environment fundamentally without a serious reflection on the dangers. The sense of crisis' brought the rise of modern Ecology in awareness of survivability of the humanity. Because the serious reflection is not just a campaign for environmental protection, but is to establish the values which is possible to coexist and to make harmony between the nature and man, man and man, and to form a healthy relationship through philosophical thought and practice has intrinsic value for human and nature. Under these circumstances, if Yulgok lives now and he is questioned by the ecological theorists of the 21st century that "What do you think about the serious environmental problem of present times?", what really would be his explanation? In the presentation methods of the explanation, will question first what contents western ecologists who study Theory of the environment in technology, Deep Ecology, and Social Ecology propose, then will compare and introduce what similarities and differences from theirs. As a result, we'll be found that Yulgok's thought, moral consciousness, about the nature and humanity as a confucian scholar.

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.192
• /
• pp.6-7
• /
• 1996

• Journal of the Korea Construction Safety Engineering Association
• /
• s.33
• /
• pp.44-47
• /
• 2005

• Fire Protection Technology
• /
• s.19
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 1995

• The Safety technology
• /
• no.90
• /
• pp.12-15
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems Conference
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.3-18
• /
• 2005