• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2004.05a
• /
• pp.837-840
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 행정기관 홈페이지 평가 항목 중에 접근성에 관한 새로운 세부항목 평가 기준을 제시하고 시각디자인적인 요소를 중심으로 웹사이트 평가를 행한 결과를 제시한다 평가 기준을 가독성, 위치성, 구조성, 심미성, 편의성 등의 6 가지 기준으로 나누고 평가한 결과, 현재 공공기관 웹사이트는 심미성, 위치성에 관한 항목들이 매우 잘 만들어져 가고 있는 반면, 기관들의 웹사이트 가독성과 일관성의 통합 작업이 부족함을 알게 되고 보완의 가이드 라인을 제시할 수 있게 되었다. 본 연구의 결과가 시각디자인 요소를 중심으로 한 사용자 인터페이스 디자인의 표준모델의 일부로 활용되어 공공기관 웹사이트를 이용한 대민 서비스의 질적 향상과 기관 이미지 제고에 이바지 할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 대학교육
• /
• s.155
• /
• pp.58-63
• /
• 2008

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.694-704
• /
• 2021

To improve the quality of government-funded vocational training, an accreditation system of vocational training providers has been implemented since 2015. The purpose of this study was to suggest improvement measures by analyzing the accreditation system and the perceptions surrounding it. To this end, accreditation systems from European countries, such as Germany and the UK, as well as related domestic systems, were reviewed. Two surveys were administered to 131 appraisers and 370 vocational training providers. The study results showed that changes to the standard and accreditation processes are not needed at this point. In the long term, however, it will be necessary to request that vocational training providers adopt their quality assurance system. In addition, both appraisers and vocational training providers responded that the accreditation system is being established to increase the quality assurance system within vocational training providers. Based on the study results, several implications for improving the accreditation system were suggested as follows: a vocational training enhancement centered on outstanding vocational training providers; an accreditation system simplification for short-term vocational training providers; a stronger monitoring system during the accreditation period; and an operation of outcome-based accreditation.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.49
• /
• pp.51-75
• /
• 2016

A records management agency assessment must reflect the possibility of actual situations including conditions and implementation. Institutional evaluation systems and indicators tools to improve records management. However, the reality is difficult if they are not conducted through the resources and efforts of the organization. The 2017 evaluation system of the National Archives of Korea and the index, which was published in March 2016, are expected to be highly difficult to perform as the frontline field tasks of the institution for a year. It is composed of indices with questionable effectiveness that are difficult to implement on the field. Some of these include the following: three training sessions for more than 10% of all employees, submission of document archive pictures of all schools, submission of the index items of all documents, increasing the utilization level of the standard record management system for the electronic documents that have not been transferred for several years, the transfer of non-electronic documents of all institutions, reclassification of non-disclosed records, etc. It recognizes the fundamental problems of the records management system and the 2017 evaluation indicators that the National Archives has mentioned about operations. As such, now is the time to reflect the years of experience in the field to amass knowledge that will help improve records management.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.65
• /
• pp.151-197
• /
• 2020

The records management evaluation system is a system operated by the National Archives of Korea since 2007 based on the 「Public Records Management Act」. As the environment of public records management changes dramatically, there is a growing perception that fundamental improvement is necessary in the operation of this evaluation system. In particular, it is required that the most emphasized area is the customized methods based on the type and characteristics of the institutions. This study focused on the self-evaluation method, which aims to strengthen the autonomous evaluation capability of institutions as a new records management evaluation system in public institutions. In particular, the needs to change toward the self-evaluation method is described in relation to the diversity of the institutions to be evaluated, the specificity of the organizational structure of the archives, and the hierarchy and individuality of the institutions. A self-evaluation system (draft) was designed by which an institution diagnoses the records management work by itself, which aims to improve the level of performance. It also covered the development of evaluation items and indicators, the step-by-step application, and the legal and operational aspects to run the records management evaluation system in phases in public records management practices.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.36-69
• /
• 2009

This work aims to firstly know what does the inside and outside participants perceive the system itself and its execution in the evaluation of the research institutes in science and technology sector which has been introduced in 1999, and to secondly discuss how can diverse perceptions among participants be integrated in the institutional and operational aspects. This has been conducted mainly by in-depth interviews with 99 staffs from 10 research institutes under the Korea Research Council for Public Technology as well as with 10 members of evaluation committee for research institutes. According to the in-depth interviews, the both inside and outside participants perceive that the evaluation of research institutes can be necessary and useful for the management of the institute itself and R&D programs in view of the strategic reasons as well as practical one. Despite of the affirmative perceptions to the evaluation of research institute, based on the common or individual experiences, they have also suggested that there will be lots of improvements in the individual components of evaluation system and its current status of execution.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.251-274
• /
• 2019

It has been more than ten years since the evaluation system of records management in public institutions was introduced. Over the past decade, the evaluation system of records management in public institutions has contributed to the professional deployment of records management and the expansion of the records infrastructure. However, at this time, it is necessary to introduce a new evaluation system because of various problems including ranking and insufficiency of feedback measure. Therefore, we attempted to identify the problems and suggest the direction of improvement by analyzing the status of the evaluation system for records management in public institutions and collecting opinions from various sectors. The directions of the new institutional evaluation on records management based on the analysis of the problems are a step-by-step introduction, the selection of customized evaluation indicators according to institutional characteristics, the introduction of the governance system, self-evaluation by selecting autonomous indicators of institutions, and the strengthening of the consulting function of the National Archives of Korea.

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.405-410
• /
• 1998

디젤 기관의 신뢰성 평가는 일반적으로 운전주에 발생한 사고 내용을 통계처리하여 팡가하기 때문에 운전자가 사전에 사고 발생을 예견하여 적절한 시기에 예방정비를 한다든지 기관의 상태에 따른 최적 운전조건을 파악하여 기관을 안전하게 운전하는데 어려움이 있다. 또한 디제 기관을 새로이 개발한다든지 설계 변경을 할 경우 기관의 신뢰성을 평가하는데도 상당한 어려움이 있다, 본논문에서는 선박용 주기관으로 사용되는 디젤기관을 대상으로하여 디젤기관의 운전상태에 따른 운전신뢰성을 예측할 수 있는 프로그램을 개발하였으며 예측결과를 실험결과와 비교·검토하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2016.11a
• /
• pp.278-280
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 재난대응훈련시 훈련의 결과를 객관적으로 평가할 수 있는 지표를 개발하는 것이 목적이다. '재난대응 안전한국훈련'은 전 국민이 참여하는 훈련으로 재난대응 행동요령 숙지는 물론, 안전문화 확산에 기여토록 추진하고 범국가적 재난대응체제 확립을 위한 발생가능한 모든 재난유형을 대비한 국가종합훈련이다. 재난대응훈련 평가지표 개발에는 재난대응 안전한국훈련의 평가분야별 평가지표 분석 및 적용, 최종점수 100점 만점을 기준으로 평가결과 3등급(A, B, C) 부여, 중앙평가위원회에서 기관별 평가결과 및 협력도를 종합적으로 검토, 우수기관 선정 및 포상 추진, 미흡기관(C등급 하위 10%) 역량교육 및 재훈련, 기관별 미적용 평가지표는 해당 배점을 제외하는 것 등으로 지표 개발을 고려한다. 재난대응훈련 평가지표 개선을 위하여 개발된 표준훈련절차와 평가지표를 바탕으로 테스트베드를 통한 문제점을 도출한 후 운용 및 적용성을 보완하여 시스템 운영을 하도록 한다.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.89-102
• /
• 2018

In this paper, the security characteristics of healthcare institutions were derived through analysis of previous research, and the characteristics and status of small and medium sized healthcare institutions were surveyed through field surveys of small and medium sized healthcare institutions. The security management evaluation model for small and medium sized healthcare institutions was designed and verified based on the security characteristics of small and medium healthcare institutions. For the design, we compared and analyzed existing security management system and evaluation certification system of healthcare institutions. We also confirmed the proposed security management evaluation model and the degree of sharing. In addition, we conducted validation for the statistical verification of the proposed security management evaluation model for small and medium sized healthcare institutions, and we performed the relative priority analysis through AHP analysis to derive the weight for each item. The result of this study is expected to be used as a standard of security management evaluation model that can be practiced in small and medium sized healthcare institutions.