• Title/Summary/Keyword: 그리스도의배타성

Search Result 1, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Jung, the Symbolical/Intuitional Understanding of the Symbol, and the Interreligious Dialogue (융, 상징적/직관적 상징이해, 그리고 종교간의 대화)

  • Seung Chul Kim
    • Sim-seong Yeon-gu
    • /
    • v.26 no.2
    • /
    • pp.189-208
    • /
    • 2011
  • The psychology of Carl G. Jung is often called an "ancilla religionis"(servant of religion, James Heisig), by which Jung's understanding of the unconsciousness of human being as the religious one is well expressed. According to Jung the dichotomy between the consciousness and the unconsciousness of men is reconciled in the various religious symbols of the world religions. He also asserted that the religious symbols must be understood and interpreted by a symbolical way. When the religious symbols are understood literally and dogmatically, they lost their dynamic power to bring salvation to men. In this paper I try to understand the essence of the symbolical and intuitional understanding of the exclusiveness of Jesus Christ. The confession of the Christianity that only Christ, once for all, could bring the salvation to the whole humankind is to be interpreted by a symbolical and intuitional way. That means, Christ is to be understood as a always new being at every time when he is confessed as a salvator. Christ as a symbol could never be a historical past. I mentioned about the understanding of Buddha by Muneyoshi Yanagi, a Japanese Shinto Buddhist, in order to show how such a symbolical and intuitional understanding of the Christ could be possible.