• Journal of Korea Game Society
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.117-125
• /
• 2009

In real-time strategy simulation (RTS) game each team is composed of agents and executes strategies to win other team. Strategy needs agents' cooperation in each team. This needs multi-agent system (MAS). Centralized decision making, one of decision making in MAS, selects actions not to agents but to team by a coordinated agent. Decentralized decision making costs high because each agent communicates with each other. In this paper we propose a system which controls agents by grouping and allocates roles through negotiation by a coordinated agent. Then, when one of allocated actions is not executed or failed, a coordinated agent allocates its role to another agent. We make experiments in starcraft, famous RTS game. When a proposed method is applied, the performance of attack and defense is increased. The improved agents' team wins eight times per ten games.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.327-337
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to identify the levels and to analyze their correlations of decision-making-competency, adjustment to college life, satisfaction to college life in freshmen. The subjects were 325 freshmen. Data were collected through structured questionnaire from September to October, 2009, and analyzed with SPSS 17.0. The results of this study were as follows: decision-making-competency of college freshmen was $61.77{\pm}7.70$, adjusting to college life was $60.97{\pm}8.94$, and satisfaction to college life was $57.97{\pm}10.80$. Relationships between adjusting to college life and decision-making-competency in college freshmen (r=.159, p<.001), between decision-making-competency and satisfaction to college life (r=.121, p<.05), between adjustment to college life and satisfaction to college life (r=.543, p<.001) showed a statistically significant positive correlations. These results will be used for developing programs for the college freshmen in adjusting to college life and student dropout prevention.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2014

Many angel investors hesitate to invest in early-stage company. Most early-stage company has no sales and only R&D step project or in early approach of market. So it's impossible to evaluate early-stage company quantitatively. Therefore many angel investors depend on CEO's tendency to evaluate company and make decision for investment. The purpose of this study is discover the entrepreneurial characteristics of CEO and the importance level which affect on the angel investors decision making factors for investment. To identify the factors of entrepreneurial characteristics, survey was conducted by Delphi Technique which is involved by 20 experts who is angel investment club members, venture capitalists, CEOs and officers. Three rounds of survey results derived 10 elements of entrepreneurial characteristics for investment decision making factors including reliability, risk sensitivity, passion, perseverance, integrity, leadership, startup experience, organizational management skills, innovation and social networking. In addition, this study derived the importance level of elements of entrepreneurial characteristics based on the AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) theory and maintained the logical consistency by pair-wise comparison for each element. As a result of analyzing the importance of entrepreneurial characteristics, the sequence is reliability (18.1%), integrity (15.9%), leadership (11.7%), organizational management skills (10.0%), social networking (9.5%), passion(9.1%), perseverance(8.4%), innovation(8.1%), startup experience(5.3%) and risk sensitivity(3.9%) respectively. The significance of this study is somewhat decrease limit of the uncertainty arising from angel investors and angel investors can help a decision making, by discover factors of entrepreneurial characteristics that can be called the biggest influencing factors among Investor's investment decision-making In early stage companies and compare importance.

• 한국데이터정보과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.19-25
• /
• 2003

데이터베이스에 내재된 패턴이나 관계를 묘사한 것만으로도 의사결정에 필요한 정보를 제공할 수 있는데 이 데이터들의 변수들을 비슷한 특징을 가지는 소그룹으로 나누어 패턴을 찾는 것을 군집분석이라 한다. 이러한 군집 분석에는 분리군집방법과 계층적군집방법이 있는데, 재할당이 가능한 분리군집방법의 여러 알고리즘에 대해 비교해보자. 분리군집알고리즘에는 중심을 평균으로 하는 k-평균 알고리즘과, 중심을 메도이드로하는 PAM, CLARA, CLARANS 알고리즘이 있다. 이러한 알고리즘에 대한 이론과, 장단점을 설명하고, 분산과 중심들간의 평균 거리로 비교해 본다.

• Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.49-58
• /
• 2003

There have been growing recognition on the needs of coordination of diverse activities across cross-functional business areas necessarily involving group decision-making processes. Although many group decision-making support tools and methods have been introduced to enable the collaborative processes of group decision-making, they often lack features supporting the dynamic complexity issues. This study proposes system dynamics modeling approach based on simulation techniques to deal with the group decision-making tasks having properties of dynamic complexity.

• Proceedings of the Korea Database Society Conference
• /
• 1998.09a
• /
• pp.433-447
• /
• 1998

데이터 웨어하우스는 일상업무 처리를 위한 운영 데이터(Operational Data)의 관리를 목적으로 구현되는 전통적인 데이터베이스 시스템에 대응하는 새로운 개념으로서, 업무분석 및 의사결정을 위한 '정보 데이터(Informational Data)'를 효과적으로 제공하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 최근 가트너그룹의 조사에 의하면, 데이터베이스 보유기업중 대부분이 향후 5년 이내에 데이터 웨어하우스를 구축할 것으로 전망하고 있어 국내외적으로 급격한 수요증가가 예상되고 있다. 데이터 웨어하우스에 대한 수요 증대와 더불어, 국내 연구 기관에서도 독자적인 데이터 웨어하우스 관리 시스템 또는 구현 도구들을 개발하기 시작하고 있으나, 주로 UNIX 시스템을 대상으로 하고 있다.(중략)

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2009.05a
• /
• pp.376-380
• /
• 2009

본 논문에서는 하천정비에 있어 구상, 계획, 설계, 사업, 운용 유지관리의 각 단계에 따른 대응에서 의사 합의 형성의 목적과 논의의 대상을 정하고, 객관적이며 합리적인 합의 형성 방법을 선택하는 모델로서 "안전", "이용", "환경" 이라고 하는 3요소 모델을 제안하고자 한다. 종래의 제도로써 계획의 절차, 환경평가, 행정소송, 의회제도에 새로운 대응으로써 공공사업의 구상 단계에 있어서 주민 참가 절차 등을 고려하고, 다양한 이해관계자의 의향을 조정하고, 원할한 합의 형성을 추진하면서, 대상 사업 등을 사회적으로 바람직하게 끌어가기 위한 합의 형성에 관한 종합적인 producer의 필요성을 논한다. 끝으로 이 모델에 의거한 4대강 정비사업에 대한 예비 전문가 그룹의 의사결정의 관점을 합의 형성 이론과 테크닉으로써 분석결과, 4대강 정비사업에 대하여는 3요소간의 우선순위가 "안전", "환경", "이용" 의 순으로 나타나고 있어, "이용" 에 우선순위를 둔 경부대운하 사업에 대한 시민들의 우려를 뒷받침하고 있다. 또, 전통적인 유역하천에 대하여는 "환경" 이 큰 비중을 차지하고 있어 시민의 환경에 대한 높은 관심을 표현하고 있다. 끝으로 이러한 새로운 패러다임을 파악하기 위한 3요소 모델의 의사합의 형성내용을 하천정비사업이나 관리에 적용하여 실현시키기 위하여 하천정비사업에도 "유니버설디자인" 수법의 도입을 제언한다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.269-275
• /
• 2004

Geographic data have widely been applied in different areas including landuse, city planning and management, environment, disaster management and even daily use of citizens. Since geographic data have been built individually using different methods, many problems such as data inconsistency, duplicated investment, and confusion in decision making have arisen. Thus, the necessity of national framework database that can be shared by different areas has increased. As a result, eight fields of the framework database were defined by NGIS Law and 19 detailed items were selected. This study used the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and the decision tree to evaluate the relative importance of the items (eg. roads, railroads, coastline, surveying control points, and etc.) and presented the groups classified according to the priorities of the items. The result of this study is believed to contribute to effective budget planning for building national framework database.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.9-18
• /
• 2008

Information security is a critical issue for network centric warfare(NCW). This paper provides defense information system security guidelines for NCW, which is a result of the research through a group decision making process. The purpose of the research is to intended to help military officers establish information system security measures within their organization.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2001.10a
• /
• pp.106-110
• /
• 2001

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is well suited to group decision making and offers numerous benefits as a synthesizing mechanism in group decisions. To date, the majority of AHP applications have been in group settings. In general, aggregation methods employed in AHP can be largely classified into two methods: geometric mean method and (weighted) arithmetic mean method. In a situation where there do not exist clear guidelines for selection between them, two methods do not always guarantee the same group decision result. Thus we suggest a simulation approach for building group consensus as a complementary tool, even when just group judgments are required. Without any efforts to make point estimates from individual diverse preference judgments, a simulation approach suggests the process how the individual preference judgments are aggregated into consensus, displaying possible disagreements as is natural in group members' different viewpoints.