• Korean Journal of Legislative Studies
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.177-207
• /
• 2009

This paper deals with the future role of Korean National Assembly in regulatory policy making, Implementation, and evaluation. For this purpose, the author developed the logic for NA's intervention to the regulatory policy making by the executive branch and presidency. Five models of regulatory initiative between National Assembly and the executive branch are also developed by the author. Lastly, new organizational alternatives for the National Assembly to initiate, to participate and to evaluate national regulatory reform policies.

• Journal of Korea Game Society
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.145-158
• /
• 2015

There are a lot of game regulations in Korea. Each scholar has invested a game regulation. But there is no research about all the game regulations. All regulations in government should be registered in Regulatory Reform Committee. So, this study researched the all game regulation in Regulatory Reform Committee and found the present state and character of game regulation in Korea. The registered game regulations are only 22. But actually, there are 44 regulations in game field. And according to legal context, there are over 60 regulations in game field. And a lot of game regulations focus on the game addiction and gambling. The differences of regulation would influence the policy trust and government trust. This result would contribute to reform the regulation of game in Korea.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to suggest the regulatory system to the shipping adn Port division. This paper indicates that the regulatory system of Shipping Port, and Logistics division in Korea in the first step and there need to introduce new regulatory quality management system such as Regulatory Import Analysis(RIA). This paper makes new collection criteria based on OECD(1993) standard, and applies to 314 regulation to collect the need to be deregulated, and 5 regulation thar need to introduce new regulatory system.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2007.06a
• /
• pp.499-503
• /
• 2007

우리나라에서는 대다수 규제산업 부문에서 수익률 규제를 도입해 왔었다. 최근 선진국에서는 규제기관들이 수익률 규제가 지니고 있는 문제점을 보완하고, 피규제 기업의 생산성을 제고하기 위하여 유인 규제를 도입하는 경향이 있다. 슬라이딩 스케일 규제는 미국에서 특히 통신산업 부문에서 유인 규제의 한 방법으로 도입되고 있다. 이 규제방식은 기업이 생산성 향상의 일부를 소비자에게 환원하는 방식이며, 효율성과 공정성을 동시에 달성할 수 있는 잠재적 이득을 지니고 있다. 본 고에서는 전통적 규제방식인 수익률 규제와 유인 규제의 대표적 방식인 가격상한 규제를 살펴본 후, 단순한 형태의 슬라이딩 스케일 규제 모형의 경제적 특성을 고찰하고자 한다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.11
• /
• pp.275-280
• /
• 2018

This study attempts to examine the equity of regulation in advertising. After scrutinizing asymmetric regulation in advertising, this study propose measures to increase the equity of advertising regulation. This study proposed horizontal regulation and unification of regulatory agencies as direction of increasing the equity of regulation in advertising. In order to ensure the equity of advertising regulation in the new types of media that appear in various ways, horizontal regulation that decides advertising regulation policy based on the nature of contents or service is desirable. To increase the equity of regulation in advertising, it is recommended that the advertising regulatory system be operated with integrated regulatory organization.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.157-183
• /
• 1993

1990년 이후의 정부(政府)의 규제완화(規制緩和) 노력에도 불구하고 일부 산업을 제외하고는 규제완화(規制緩和)의 정책효과(政策效果)가 산업 전반에 뚜렷이 나타나지 못하고 있다. 본고(本稿)는 정부(政府)의 규제완화추진(規制緩和推進)이 큰 효과를 보이지 못하고 있는 원인으로서, 첫째 상설적(常設的)인 규제완화(規制緩和) 추진주체(推進主體)가 없어서 규제(規制)의 주체(主體)가 규제완화(規制緩和)의 실질적인 추진주체가 되어 소극적인 정책추진만을 하였다는 점, 둘째 지속적인 산업실태(産業實態) 조사(調査) 연구(硏究) 및 개별산업별(個別産業別) 규제(規制)의 비용(費用)-편익분석(便益分析)이 결여되어 객관적이며 효과적인 규제완화(規制緩和) 대상과제선정(對象課題選定)이 이루어지지 못하였다는 점, 그리고 규제완화과정(規制緩和過程)에서 공익단체(公益團體), 시민단체(市民團體) 등의 적극적언 참여가 없어서 피규제집단(被規制集團)의 반발에 효과적으로 대응하지 못하였다는 점을 지적하였다. 효과적(效果的)인 규제완화추진(規制緩和推進)을 위한 정책과제(政策課題)로서 본고(本稿)는, 첫째 지속적인 규제완화추진(規制緩和推進)과 사후이행점검, 그리고 신규규제(新規規制)에 대한 사전심사기능(事前審査機能)을 담당할 "규제완화추진기획단(規制緩和推進企劃團)(가칭(假稱))"을 상설기관(常設機關)으로 설치하고, 둘째 부문별(部門別) "규제완화(規制緩和) 민간협의회(民間協議會)(가칭(假稱))"를 구성하여 핵심적인 규제완화 대상과제의 발굴 및 세부추진계획을 수립한 후 기획단(企劃團)에 정책건의(政策建議)할 수 있도록 하며, 셋째 규제완화(規制緩和) 과정(過程)의 합리화(合理化) 공개화(公開化)를 통하여 피규제집단(被規制集團)의 반발에 적절히 대응하여야 한다는 점을 제시하였다.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.85-118
• /
• 2011

This paper uses the horizontal regulation system as the base analysis framework. The study clearly defines the regulatory goals of the followings: the horizontal cross-ownership regulations on program provider (PP) and platform provider, the vertical regulation on cross-ownership between PP and platform operator, the regulation on cross-ownership of program provider by terrestrial broadcasting company, and the regulation on cross-ownership between terrestrial broadcasting company and platform provider. Then, by analyzing the conformity between goals and criteria of regulations and the adequacy of the regulation level according to regulatory purposes, this paper examines the justifiability of each regulation and extracts improvement measures that suite regulatory purposes. This analysis finds following appropriate measures: replacing the horizontal cross-ownership regulation on PP with conduct regulations, such as designating major broadcasting programs or replacing the current criterion of cross-ownership regulation from sales to the audience market share; reshaping the horizontal cross-ownership regulation on platform provider so that system operator (SO), satellite broadcaster and Internet protocol television (IPTV) operator would be applied by the same regulation based on the number of subscribers of pay television services; and discontinuing other cross-ownership regulation. In this way, the study shows that with appropriate regulations on cross-ownership of PP, there would be no need for additional regulation on vertical integration between PP and platform operator. On the other hand, given that the regulation on terrestrial broadcasting cross-ownership of PP could be justified only by regulatory purpose of the protection of the diversity of public opinions, it would be desirable to replace the current criteria of the number of PPs with the criteria of the audience market share. Lastly, the study shows that when platform operator is targeted by the cross-ownership regulation based on the number of subscribers of pay television services, the regulation on cross-ownership between terrestrial broadcasting company and platform provider should be replaced with conduct regulations, such as designating must-offer channels and major broadcasting programs.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2001.05a
• /
• pp.123-138
• /
• 2001

전통적으로 정보통신산업에서는 요금규제방식으로 최종 서비스 시장에 대해서는 보수율규제, 중간재 시장에 대해서는 공통원가 배분방식을 채용하는 것이 일반적 경향이었다. 그러나 최근 선진국에서는 전자의 시장에 대해서는 가격상한규제, 후자의 시장에 대해서는 장기증분 원가방식으로 옮겨가고 있다. 본 고에서는 이들 최종 서비스 가격에 대한 두 가지 규제방식과 접속료에 대한 두 가지 규제방식을 짝 짓기 하여 4개의 규제조합을 만들고, 각 규제조합이 정부의 규제목표에 어느 정도 기여하는지를 논의하고 우리 나라의 현실에 부합되는 규제조합을 제시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2002.11a
• /
• pp.91-95
• /
• 2002

본 논문은 규제정책의 관점에서 전기통신분야 기술기준규제의 성격을 규명하기 위하여 우선 정부규제론에서 논의되고 있는 경제적 규제와 사회적 규제에 대한 논의를 검토하고 이러한 논의를 바탕으로 현재 정부 규제로서의 기술기준의 성격과 그 함의를 도출하여 전기통신분야 기술기준규제의 바람직한 정립 방향을 모색코자 한다.

• Journal of Regulation Studies
• /
• v.27 no.2
• /
• pp.71-104
• /
• 2018

Regulatory agencies' response to resource constraints is an important issue in terms of regulatory effectiveness, but systematic research is lacking. As an effort to overcome this limitation, this study was to explore behaviors of regulatory agencies in response to resource constraints. Reviewing the precedent studies based on regulatory and organizational theories, the study suggested the potential behaviors of regulatory agencies under resource constraints: changes in regulatory processes, changes in enforcement methods, decoupling, and regulatory delegation and contracting-out. The study also discussed the realistic explanations of the response behaviors partly through the case of marine transportation regulation, and explained the problems that the regulatory agency's behaviors could bring about. Based on the findings, the study suggested that the regulatory framework should be designed to ensure the effectiveness of the regulatory system in consideration of the regulatory agencies' behaviors under resource constraints. The study is expected to contribute to developing a theoretical analysis framework ultimately for an empirical study in the future.