• Title/Summary/Keyword: 권리주장

Search Result 102, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Photo line and Human rights (포토라인과 인권)

  • Lee, cheol-ho
    • Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
    • /
    • 2019.05a
    • /
    • pp.135-136
    • /
    • 2019
  • 수사기관이 운영하는 포토라인이 피의자 망신주기용이며 헌법상 무죄추정의 원칙에 반하므로 없애야 한다는 주장과 국민의 알 권리를 위해 포토라인은 반드시 필요하다는 주장이 대립하고 있다. 포토라인의 문제를 헌법상 무죄추정의 원리와 알권리를 중심으로 합리적 해결방안을 모색해보고자 한다.

  • PDF

Legal and Ethical Insight about Witch Hunt Issues on Online News and 'Pseudo Press' (온라인 매체상의 현대식 마녀사냥 이슈와 '유사언론 행위'간 법적·윤리적 논쟁에 대한 고찰)

  • Jeung, Woon Gap
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.18 no.7
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 2018
  • Present study investigated the crash phenomenon between freedom of press and pseudo press. For that researcher gathered online witch hunt cases from 2012 to 2017 and interpret with the logical basis of argument which needs to control pseudo press activity. On the other hand, present research arranged former studies about freedom of press and right of reputation and privacy as a counterpart that can be ethical debate. Futhermore, court case about right of small independent media where has less than 5 people also gathered. By Comparison of each ethical and legal basis, this study provide the insight which can inspire to think about real right of citizen and press.

Two Face of Citizenship Discourse - Reinterpretation of Social Citizenship of Marshall - (시민권 담론의 두 얼굴 - Marshall의 사회적 시민권에 대한 재해석을 중심으로 -)

  • Seo, Jeong-hee
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
    • /
    • no.39
    • /
    • pp.147-165
    • /
    • 2008
  • This Study analysis two features of social citizenship in the period of rights revolution. Discousive arguments are derived from different reinterpretations of social citizenship of Marshall. Some insist that main idea of welfare state is rights of social citizenship and the other insist that social rights is realized after doing duty. Especially the latter emphasis work obligation in which individual responsibility and duty, these discussion underlie wokrfare policy. This reserch examine two contrary discourses based on Marshall's theory, and make a close inquiry into correct interpretation about Marshall. New rights, the Conservative party and New Labour seek for ground on Marshall's citizenship theory, but these are distortion on it. Marshall insisted that citizenship constituted rights and duties but he claimed that discharge of a duty isn't precondition of the exercise of the right.

The China Coast Guard Law (2021): A New Tool for Intimidation and Aggression (중국해안경비법(Coast Guard Law)(2021): 위협과 공격을 위한 도구)

  • Pedrozo, Raul (Pete)
    • Maritime Security
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-44
    • /
    • 2021
  • China's new Maritime Policy Law (MPL) purports to regulate the duties of China's maritime police agencies, including the China Coast Guard, and safeguard China's sovereignty, security, and rights and interest. The MPL has potentially far-reaching application, as China claims extensive maritime areas off its mainland and in the South China Sea. This expansive application of maritime law enforcement jurisdiction is problematic given that most of China's maritime claims are inconsistent with international law. To the extent that the MPL purports to assert jurisdiction over foreign flagged vessels in disputed areas or on the high seas, it contravenes international law. Numerous provisions of the MPL regarding the use of force are also inconsistent with international rules and standards governing the use of maritime law enforcement jurisdiction, as well as the UN Charter's prohibition on the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. China could use the MPL as a subterfuge to advance its illegal territorial and maritime claims in the South and East China Seas and interfere with coastal State resource rights in their respective exclusive economic zone.

  • PDF

법률가이드 - 일정기간 법적 조치 없으면 대금 못받을 수 있다

  • 전국보일러설비협회
    • 보일러설비
    • /
    • s.194
    • /
    • pp.111-111
    • /
    • 2010
  • 물품 외상 대금과 같은 경우 친분이나 거래 관계 때문에 "언제간 주겠지..." 하는 식으로 기다리게 되면 어느 순간 법적 보호를 받지 못하고 대금 청구도 할 수 없게 된다. 바로 소멸 시효가 완성되기 때문이다. 민법에는 '소멸시효' 라는 독특한 제도가 있다. 이는 일정한 사실 상태가 계속되면 그 사실 상태가 진실한 권리관계에 합치 하느냐 않느냐를 묻지 않고서 그 사실 상태를 존중하여 법률상 일정효과를 발생시키는 제도로서, 법률상 채권자가 채무자에게 금전채권을 갖고 있으면서도 일정기간(소멸시효 기간)채무자를 상대로 법적 조치를 취하지 않으면 금전채권은 소멸하게 되고, 채권자는 더 이상 권리주장을 하지 못하게 되는 것이다.

  • PDF

The Right To Be Forgotten and the Right To Delete News Articles A Critical Examination on the Proposed Revision of The Press Arbitration Act (기사 삭제 청구권 신설의 타당성 검토 잊힐 권리를 중심으로)

  • Mun, So Young;Kim, Minjeong
    • Korean journal of communication and information
    • /
    • v.76
    • /
    • pp.151-182
    • /
    • 2016
  • The right to be forgotten (RTBF) has been a population notion to address privacy issues associated with the digitalization of information and the dissemination of such information over the global digital network. In May 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) laid down a landmark RTBF decision to grant individuals the right to be de-listed from search results. ECJ's RTBF decision sparked an increased interest in RTBF in South Korea. Academic and non-academic commentators have provided a mistaken or outstretched interpretation of RTBF in claiming that removal of news articles should be read into RTBF in Korean law. Moreover, the Press Arbitration Commission of Korea (PAC) has proposed revising the Press Arbitration Act (PAA) to allow the alleged victims of news reporting to request the deletion of news stories. This article examines the notion of RTBF from its origin to the latest development abroad and also critically explores Korean laws regulation freedom of expression to evaluate if Korea needs the proposed PAA revision.

  • PDF

The Effect of Female University Students' Gender-Role Stereotype on Sexual Assertiveness: Mediating Effect of Self-Esteem (여대생의 성역할고정관념이 성적자기주장에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감의 매개효과)

  • Lee, Hye-Lim;Han, You-Jin
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.454-460
    • /
    • 2021
  • This study focused on the sex culture and the sexual rights of women, examining the gender-role stereotype that is related to the protection of the sexual rights of female college students and identifying the influence of self- esteem. The research was conducted on gender-role stereotypes, sexual assertiveness, and self-esteem among female university students attending four-year universities in Seoul and Gyeonggi. Four hundred eighty-two copies were used for analysis. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to identify the correlation between the variables. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify the mediated effects of self-esteem in the effects of gender-role stereotypes on sexual assertiveness. The Sobel test was conducted to confirm that the effects were statistically significant. The results of this study were as follows. First, the gender-role stereotype had negative correlations with self-esteem and sexual assertiveness. Self-esteem had positive correlations with sexual assertiveness. Second, self-esteem was found to be a partial mediating factor when the gender-role stereotype had a statistically significant effect on sexual assertiveness. Therefore, a coping strategy under the influence of the gender-role stereotype is necessary for improving the sexual assertiveness skill of female students. This study also suggests the need for sex role-related education programs or counseling on self-esteem.

특허 항고심판의 재판청구권 침해여부(완)

  • 김성기
    • 발명특허
    • /
    • v.17 no.3 s.193
    • /
    • pp.18-21
    • /
    • 1992
  • 대법원은 지난 연말 특허청의 항고심결에 불복하는 자가 대법원에 상고할 수 있도록 규정한 특허법 제186조 제1항이 헌법 제101조 제1항 및 제27조 제1항에 위배된다는 주장에 대하여 이를 헌법 재판소에서 심판하여 달라는 취지의 위헌제청 결정을 내렸다. 위헌제청 신천인의 주장을 보면, 행정부인 특허청 항고심판소에서 특허심판을 수행하고 있는 것은 법관에 의한 재판 받을 권리를 규정한 헌법에 배치되며, 도한 사실심에 관해 항고심판이 최종심이 되므로 사법권은

  • PDF

특허 항고심판의 재판청구권 침해여부(1)

  • 김성기
    • 발명특허
    • /
    • v.17 no.2 s.192
    • /
    • pp.30-33
    • /
    • 1992
  • 대법원은 지난 연말 특허청의 항고심결에 불복하는 자가 대법원에 상고할 수 있도록 규정한 특허법 제186조 제1항이 헌법 제101조 제1항 및 제27조 제1항에 위배된다는 주장에 대하여 이를 헌법 재판소에서 심판하여 달라는 취지의 위헌제청 결정을 내렸다. 위헌제청 신천인의 주장을 보면, 행정부인 특허청 항고심판소에서 특허심판을 수행하고 있는 것은 법관에 의한 재판 받을 권리를 규정한 헌법에 배치되며, 도한 사실심에 관해 항고심판이 최종심이 되므로 사법권은

  • PDF