• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.430-435
• /
• 2007

소음특성이 서로 다른 군용 항공기 소음과 민간 항공기 소음을 환경부에서 고시한 소음 진동공정시험방법에 의거하여 소음을 측정하고 평가하는데는 개선되어야 할 문제점이 뒤따른다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 민간 항공기와 군용 항공기의 소음특성으로 조사하고 소음 측정 및 평가방법에 대한 문제점들을 고찰하였다. 연구결과로 부터, 민간 항공기나 군용 항공기의 정확한 소음측정을 위해서는 동특성을 빠름(Fast)으로 설정하여 측정하는 것이 바람직한 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 등가 소음도를 측정하여 항공기 소음을 평가하는 방식은 민간 항공기 소음평가시에는 적절하지만, 이를 군용 항공기 소음에 적용하여 평가할 때에는 상당한 오차를 포함하는 것으로 조사되었다. 그리고 군용 항공기 이 착륙지점에서의 소음 지속시간이 대부분 30초를 초과하는 것으로 조사되었기 때문에, 군용 항공기 소음평가시에는 지속시간에 대한 보정이 반드시 반영되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• Current Industrial and Technological Trends in Aerospace
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.154-160
• /
• 2008

There are typically two categories of Flight Test Programs- commercial and military. Commercial flight testing is conducted to certify that aircraft meets all applicable safety and performance requirements of government certifying agency. Military programs differs from commercial in that the government contract with the aircraft manufacturer to design and build an aircraft to meet specific mission capabilities. The final phase of military aircraft flight test is the Operational Test(OT). OT is conducted by a government-only test team with the dictate to certify that the aircraft is suitable and effective to carry out the intended mission. This paper presents the current trends of military aircraft airworthiness certification using civil aircraft certification practices.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.768-771
• /
• 2004

항공기 소음평가 방법에 있어 전혀 다른 소음특성을 갖는 군용 항공기 소음과 민간 항공기 소음을 환경부에서 고시한 소음 진동공정 시험방법에 의거하여 소음을 측정하고 평가하는데는 많은 문제점이 뒤따른다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 민간 항공기와 군용 항공기 소음의 측정 및 평가방법에 대한 문제점들을 고찰하였다. 연구결과로 부터, 민간 항공기나 군용 항공기의 정확한 소음측정을 위해서는 동특성을 빠름(Fast)으로 설정하여 측정하는 것이 바람직한 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 등가 소음도를 측정하여 항공기 소음을 평가하는 방식은 민간 항공기 소음평가시에는 적절하지만, 이를 군용 항공기 소음에 적용하여 평가할 때에는 상당한 오차를 포함하는 것으로 조사되었다. 그리고 군용 항공기 이 착륙지점에서의 소음 지속시간이 대부분 30초를 초과하는 것으로 조사되었기 때문에, 군용 항공기 소음평가시에는 지속시간에 대한 보정이 반드시 반영되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.

• Aerospace Industry
• /
• s.104
• /
• pp.16-19
• /
• 2009

지난 8월 1일 "군용항공기 비행안전성 인증에 관한 법률"이 본격 시행됐다. 국제적 수준의 비행안전 인증 체계를 마련함으로써 이제 우리도 우리 손으로 만든 국산 군용항공기의 비행안전성을 체계적으로 검증하고 국가가 그 성능을 보증할 수 있게 된 것이다. 뿐만 아니라 감항인증 관련 비용 및 시간을 대폭 단축할 수 있어 우리 손으로 만든 KT-1과 T-50의 해외 수출에도 큰 도움이 될 것으로 전망되고 있다. 군용항공기 감항인증제도 시행과 관련하여 현재까지의 진행경과 및 감항인증제도 도입 의의를 정리했다.

• Aerospace Industry
• /
• v.75
• /
• pp.54-55
• /
• 2001

충남 연기군에 위치한 썬에어로시and#49852;(주)는 최근 중소기업창에서 1만번째로 벤처기업 확인을 받은 국내 유일의 군용 시뮬레이터 설계, 제작업체이다. 이 업체는 항공기 Full Scale Mock-Up과 군용 항공기 풍동모델은 물론, 군용 항공기 및 자주포, 미사일 시뮬레이터, 항공기 시험장비, 복합재료에 이르기까지 항공기 분야에 대해 연구 개발하는 항공기 시뮬레이터 전문 개발업체이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers Conference
• /
• 2017.05a
• /
• pp.205-206
• /
• 2017

This is a study on the propulsion criteria for airworthiness certification of the military aircraft. This treatise described the introduction of the airworthiness certification system, the features and difference between the military and commercial aircraft, the introduction of the standard airworthiness certification, the important technical criteria, and the several application instances of the criteria.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.18
• /
• pp.211-245
• /
• 2003

While the necessity of introduction of legislative enactment for military aircraft operation became more evident especially after the Aviation Law that has recently been revised, the prospects of such legislative action in which adopts the unique nature of aircraft need to cone to life more than ever. Here lies our efforts to analyze the problems of Military Airbase Law, to introduce status of military-related legislations in other countries, and to examine legislative support system and overall direction for the legislative enhancement by presenting and discussing necessary subject matters m an endeavor to enact or revise the military-related aviation law.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.59-158
• /
• 2005

When a military aircraft suffers damages due to the defects in its design, manufacturing or notification, all of which are generally understood as products liability defects, the obvious compensation is sought as it would in other consumer good case. However, there exist clear yet unappreciated difference between general consumer goods and military aircraft, as far as products liability law is concerned - some sort of recovery should be obtained even when there exist only defects, not damages, to the aircraft because of the implication of defective parts is much grave than what can be expected in a consumer goods case. While certain anticipatory measures do exist in manual or at negotiation stages for the safety of military aircraft, such measures are ineffective, if not ambiguous, in recovery effort in the post-accident stage In another word, the standardized military procurement contract manuals and boilerplate forms do not appreciate the unique and dangerous military nature of military aircraft. There are many unique legal issues which can arise when trying to prevent defective aircraft or parts, or to recover compensations for accident due to such defects. At two-level, the government should establish legal system (or countermeasures if you'd like) for purchasing safer military aircraft. First, one should be able to work with legal ground and policy that allows selecting and purchasing safer goods - the purpose of such contract is not litigious, but rather in acquiring what are most reliable. Second, in case the defects do arise and lead to damages, solid legal principles and instructions should be established for effectively pursuing appropriate company, (usually a aerospace industry giant with much experience) for products liability - the purpose of such pursuit is inevitable for a public official, since he or she is no private business man with much flexibilities, even to the point of waiving such compensatory right for future business purposes. This article tries to identify problems in methods of procuring military aircraft or parts - after reviewing on how the military can improve on legal and policy grounds for procuring what will be the focus of future military strength, it will offer some of the ways to effectively handling and resolving a liability issues.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.32 no.1
• /
• pp.139-175
• /
• 2017

The Assembly plenary session on December 3, 2017 passed a Product Liability Amendment bill that introduced clauses concerning consumer burden of proof and punitive damage reimbursement. More specifically, these newly approved provisions will reduce the burden of proof placed on consumers and levy triple punitive damage on suppliers. Significant increases in the number of product-liability lawsuit and the number of related insurance contracts are expected. Since military aircraft are designed for operational purpose(seeking greater combat effectiveness over greater safety) and used in high-risk environment, it is practically impossible to obtain an affordable product-liability insurance, Without having any backup plan, military aircraft manufacturers directly face all sort of liability risks under Product Liability Act, Warrant Liability Act and Non-Performance of Contract Act. The U.S. experienced similar problems when they first implemented their product-liability law in 1970s. There had been a big dispute among legal practitioner, insurance professionals and scholars concerning military aircraft manufacturer's liability. In order to settle the issue, the U.S. Supreme Court has established a new precedent of Government Contractor Defense(GCD). The U.S. government also included an indemnity clause for military aircraft manufacturers in their FMS Contract with the Korean government. Likewise, Korean military aircraft manufacturers should 1) clearly understand their current position that they cannot afford expensive product-liability insurance and the cost is not accounted in the military procurement calculation, 2) estimate potential liability risks with the ongoing overseas export expansion in mind, 3) set up appropriate risk management measures through regulatory reform and policy development.

• Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.151-161
• /
• 2014

It is very important to evaluate proper acquisition of military aircraft against future threats in our military defense field. In previous studies, the evaluation has been determined in terms of tasking order or weapon power index. These methods compare the combat-effectiveness index and the number of aircraft. However, this study provides simulation analysis of proper quantity decision based on actual operational senarios of military aircraft using System Dynamics. The method reflects the properties of military aircraft operation concepts and considers the rate of failure of main systems on subsystems, as well as repair and crash rates caused by differentials in peacetime and wartime frame.