• Title/Summary/Keyword: 군사안보

Search Result 337, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Measures to Strengthen Korea-Japan Cyber Security Cooperation: Focusing on Joint Response to North Korean Cyber Threats (북한 사이버 위협에 대응하기 위한 한일사이버 안보협력 강화방안)

  • Tae Jin Chung
    • Convergence Security Journal
    • /
    • v.23 no.5
    • /
    • pp.199-208
    • /
    • 2023
  • South Korea and Japanese governments have never responded cooperatively to North Korea cyber threats in the past 10 years or even before that. There are two reasons: First, The historical and political conflicts between the two countries were so deep that they did not discuss their mutual needs. Second, officially, Japan had not been subjected to a North Korean cyberattack until 2022 . In particular, the issues of comfort women and forced labor during World War II were holding back the reconciliation between the two countries. With the inauguration of the Yoon Seok-yeol administration, Korea-US relati ons improved dramatically. Tensions in Northeast Asia reached their peak due to the conflict between the US and China. It has become a situation where peace cannot be garaunteed without close cooperation between Korea and Japan led by the United States.

A Study on Israel's Strategic Culture in the Middle East War Korea's Security Strategy Implications (중동전쟁의 이스라엘 전략문화 고찰과 한국의 안보전략적 함의)

  • Lee Jeong Han;Bae Il Soo
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.121-126
    • /
    • 2024
  • Israel craves peace and freedom. Israel has won many wars and conflicts militarily. They have developed strategic thinking based on the data, unique culture, and peacetime preparation system accumulated so far, and the strategic culture based on it contributes to fostering elite strong forces by presenting directions to security strategies.The strategic culture formed by Israeli beliefs, behavioral patterns, and identity influenced strategic thinking and the usefulness of security strategies. The purpose of this study is to redefine the concept of strategic culture by referring to the methodological discussion of strategic culture theory and to examine how useful strategic culture has provided strategic thinking and security strategies. In addition, based on the impact of Israel's strategic culture on security strategy, I would like to present implications for Korea's security strategy.

Eurasian Naval Power on Display: Sino-Russian Naval Exercises under Presidents Xi and Putin (유라시아 지역의 해군 전력 과시: 시진핑 주석과 푸틴 대통령 체제 하에 펼쳐지는 중러 해상합동훈련)

  • Richard Weitz
    • Maritime Security
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-53
    • /
    • 2022
  • One manifestation of the contemporary era of renewed great power competition has been the deepening relationship between China and Russia. Their strengthening military ties, notwithstanding their lack of a formal defense alliance, have been especially striking. Since China and Russia deploy two of the world's most powerful navies, their growing maritime cooperation has been one of the most significant international security developments of recent years. The Sino-Russian naval exercises, involving varying platforms and locations, have built on years of high-level personnel exchanges, large Russian weapons sales to China, the Sino-Russia Treaty of Friendship, and other forms of cooperation. Though the joint Sino-Russian naval drills began soon after Beijing and Moscow ended their Cold War confrontation, these exercises have become much more important during the last decade, essentially becoming a core pillar of their expanding defense partnership. China and Russia now conduct more naval exercises in more places and with more types of weapons systems than ever before. In the future, Chinese and Russian maritime drills will likely encompass new locations, capabilities, and partners-including possibly the Arctic, hypersonic delivery systems, and novel African, Asian, and Middle East partners-as well as continue such recent innovations as conducting joint naval patrols and combined arms maritime drills. China and Russia pursue several objectives through their bilateral naval cooperation. The Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation Between the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation lacks a mutual defense clause, but does provide for consultations about common threats. The naval exercises, which rehearse non-traditional along with traditional missions (e.g., counter-piracy and humanitarian relief as well as with high-end warfighting), provide a means to enhance their response to such mutual challenges through coordinated military activities. Though the exercises may not realize substantial interoperability gains regarding combat capabilities, the drills do highlight to foreign audiences the Sino-Russian capacity to project coordinated naval power globally. This messaging is important given the reliance of China and Russia on the world's oceans for trade and the two countries' maritime territorial disputes with other countries. The exercises can also improve their national military capabilities as well as help them learn more about the tactics, techniques, and procedures of each other. The rising Chinese Navy especially benefits from working with the Russian armed forces, which have more experience conducting maritime missions, particularly in combat operations involving multiple combat arms, than the People's Liberation Army (PLA). On the negative side, these exercises, by enhancing their combat capabilities, may make Chinese and Russian policymakers more willing to employ military force or run escalatory risks in confrontations with other states. All these impacts are amplified in Northeast Asia, where the Chinese and Russian navies conduct most of their joint exercises. Northeast Asia has become an area of intensifying maritime confrontations involving China and Russia against the United States and Japan, with South Korea situated uneasily between them. The growing ties between the Chinese and Russian navies have complicated South Korean-U.S. military planning, diverted resources from concentrating against North Korea, and worsened the regional security environment. Naval planners in the United States, South Korea, and Japan will increasingly need to consider scenarios involving both the Chinese and Russian navies. For example, South Korean and U.S. policymakers need to prepare for situations in which coordinated Chinese and Russian military aggression overtaxes the Pentagon, obligating the South Korean Navy to rapidly backfill for any U.S.-allied security gaps that arise on the Korean Peninsula. Potentially reinforcing Chinese and Russian naval support to North Korea in a maritime confrontation with South Korea and its allies would present another serious challenge. Building on the commitment of Japan and South Korea to strengthen security ties, future exercises involving Japan, South Korea, and the United States should expand to consider these potential contingencies.

  • PDF

21세기 정보기술과 신 군사력 건설방향(2) (네트워크 중심 전투 개념)

  • Kim, Yeong-Gil
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.5 s.243
    • /
    • pp.44-53
    • /
    • 1999
  • 21세기를 대비하는 미래의 군사력은 정보화의 수준에 따라 전투력 효과가 결정된다. 통합전력의 핵심인 정보화와 군 전력의 네트워크화를 통해 미래의 국가안보를 비용 대 효과적으로 이루어야 할 것이다. 따라서 방위력 개선사업의 골격을 단일 무기체계 획득 중심에서 통합 $C^4I$체계를 비롯한 정보화 체계 중심으로 전환해야 할 것으로 생각된다

  • PDF

국방력과 컴퓨터 응용

  • Kim, Hwa-Su
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.5 s.159
    • /
    • pp.52-59
    • /
    • 1992
  • '90년대 개발 예상되는 과학기술로 안보와 관련되는 분야를 예측할때 국방관련전문가들의 대부분이 고성능 컴퓨터를 꼽는다. 왜냐하면 초대형 집적회로와 병렬처리 기술의 발전으로 가능화되는 고성능 컴퓨터는 유도장치, 통제 및 명령체제 구성 등에서의 핵심기술이기 때문이다 이와 같이 컴퓨터의 응용은 군사적으로 매우 중요하며 국방력 향상의 원동력중 하나이다. 따라서 이 글에서는 컴퓨터가 어떻게 효과적으로 군의 과학화에 공헌할 수있는가를 살펴보도록 하겠다

  • PDF

2000년대 국방획득 정책방향

  • Lee, Won-Hyung
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.1 s.251
    • /
    • pp.22-33
    • /
    • 2000
  • 획득정책은 21세기의 자주적인 안보역량 발휘를 지향하는 국방정책과 군사전략의 구현을 뒷받침하는 방안을 제시할 뿐 아니라, 막대한 국방예산의 효율적인 운용에 미치는 영향이 크고, 군에 대한 국민의 신뢰에도 영향을 미치는 사안이므로 적극적인 관심을 갖고 모든 획득사업 추진에 적용.반영시켜 나가야 할 것이다.

  • PDF

21세기 자주국방력 강화를 위한 방위산업의 발전방향

  • Park, Jeong-In
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.1 s.239
    • /
    • pp.84-91
    • /
    • 1999
  • 경제여건의 변화, 국방목표의 일정 수준달성, 군사기술/무기체계의 발전등으로 방위산업에 관한 특별조치법과 전문계열화 규정은 재정비되어야 할 시점에 와있다고 판단된다. 방산 환경의 변화에 맞추어 그 토양이 되는 방산 정책과 관련 법규가 바뀌지 않는다면 건실한 방산 육성은 불가능하다 할 것이다. 미래의 안보환경에 대비하여 국내 방산업체의 육성과 발전방안을 4가지 주요사항을 중심으로 제시해 본다.

  • PDF

중국의 핵실험 배경과 전망

  • Lee, Hong-Pyo
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.7 s.209
    • /
    • pp.12-17
    • /
    • 1996
  • 중국은 탈냉전 시기에 효과적인 국가안보를 위한 군사상 비장의 카드로 값싸고, 손쉬운 핵병기의 현대화를 추진하고 있다. 중국은 이러한 핵전력의 강화를 통한 지역 대국으로서의 국가적 위신을 보존하고자 하려는 것 같다. 또한 중국이 국제여론에 역행하는 핵실험을 강행하는 것은 중국이 핵실험 이슈를 대외관계에 있어서 하나의 정치적 카드로 사용하고자 하는 의도와 관련 있어 보인다

  • PDF

항공우주산업과 국가발전전략 구상

  • Min, Seong-Gi
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.1 s.167
    • /
    • pp.36-41
    • /
    • 1993
  • 한반도의 미래전쟁 수행 전력면에서 볼 때, 우리의 군사력은 인력 위주에서 필연적으로 무기 중심의 기술집약형으로 변화되어저야만 합니다. 또한 우리를 둘러싸고 있는 대주변국간의 미래 전장도, 신기술을 동반한 첨단정밀 유도무기, 전자전 능력 및 우주공간의 안보 영역화를 이룩해야 합니다. 이러한 미래전장에서 빼놓을수 없는 분야가 항공 기본전력 등 항공.우주 기술을 동반한 전력입니다

  • PDF

21세기 국방과학기술의 발전방안

  • Yu, Jung-Seok
    • Defense and Technology
    • /
    • no.3 s.241
    • /
    • pp.52-59
    • /
    • 1999
  • "제2차 세계대전과 그 이후 냉전 기간 중 미국을 비롯한 선진국들은 국가안보를 국가의 최우선 목표로 삼았기 때문에 과학기술정책의 초점은 우선적으로 군사목적에 맞추어졌다. 하지만 냉전종식과 더불어 선진 강대국들은 국방비 규모를 축소하면서도 연구개발비는 증액하고 민.군 겸용기술화를 시도하는 등 국가과학기술과 산업경쟁력 제고를 통한 실리위주의 정책을 펴고 있다"

  • PDF