• 한국무역상무학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2001.12a
• /
• pp.161-184
• /
• 2001

• 한국무역상무학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2001.12a
• /
• pp.117-134
• /
• 2001

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.19 no.12
• /
• pp.2993-3002
• /
• 2015

INCOTERMS 2010 apply to the International Trade Contract for the last 5 years. The export trade condition and the document type for last 10 years was researched to analysis of the practical problems of INCOTERMS 2010 application. The result of the research; First, several rules which are against the official INCOTERMS 2010 rules are used. Second, the conventional rules like FAS FOB, CIF and CFR which are used for the ocean and inland transportation are applied without any changes. Third, the issue of the time of delivery(transfer of ownership) at the CPT and CIP affects not to activate these two rules. Fourth, the frequency of the DAT use is low. Because, the terminal designate is hard at the point of the contract and the terminal is changeable during the transport. According to these issues, the active publicity campaign is needed for the INCOTERMS 2010. And, the analysis of the terms and the solution of conflict are also needed.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.9
• /
• pp.137-152
• /
• 1996

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.103-130
• /
• 1998

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.131-170
• /
• 1998

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.5
• /
• pp.211-225
• /
• 2000

유엔에서 협약한 국제거래법규는 국가간의 물품매매 계약시에 지대한 영향을 행사하며 앞으로의 국제거래법에서 중요한 표준규범이 되리라 전망된다. 특히 국제거래법규는 영미법의 표준거래규범과 유사한 점이 많지만 세부적으로 살펴보면 상이점 또한 지대하다고 하겠다. 본 연구는 국제거래법규의 형성과정을 영미법을 근간으로 하고 있는 표준거래규범의 측면과 대륙법적 측면에 대한 이론적 구성을 계약형성과정을 통하여 세부적으로 검토하고자 한다. 아울러 국제거래법규의 입법취지의 이해를 돕고자 유엔에서 협약했던 유사한 국제거래규범들의 입법에 관한 역사를 연대순으로 정리하였다. 본 연구의 결론은 계약형성과정에서의 이론적 구성이 대륙법적 측면보다 영미법의 표준거래규범 측면에 있다는 것이다. 그러므로 본 연구는 영미법의 표준거래규범(U.C.C)과 더불어서 물품거래 계약시에 지대한 영향을 미치는 국제거래법규(CISG)에 대해서 근접적인 접근방식으로 고찰하였다.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.195-217
• /
• 2016

The Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods(CISG) endeavors to increase international trade through the creation of a uniform law of international sales. The CISG applies to contracts of sale of goods between parties whose places of business are in different States. If a party has more than one place of business, the place of business if that which has the closest relationship to the contract and its performance. Despite the importance of a definition for 'place of business,' the CISG does not provide one. Lack of a definition of 'place of business' may cause problems for parties trying to determine whether the CISG applies to their contract. Also Contracting parties can opt out of the CISG. But the CISG does not state whether the parties must expressly exclude the CISG's application to a transaction or whether they might do so by implication. we need to consider how effectively opt out of the CISG. Under U.S. law, the CISG is considered to be a self-executing treaty. So the CISG's provisions apply directly as substantive sales law to contracts for the international sale of goods. Despite the CISG's political and economic significance to U.S., U.S. Courts have overlooked the terms of the CISG. This article considered how to the CISG was recognized, interpreted and applied by the U.S. Courts in related cases.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.365-387
• /
• 1995

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.64
• /
• pp.3-37
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this paper is to examine thoroughly on passing of risk in contracts for the international sale of goods. Articles 66~70 of the CISG contain provisions on passing of risk. Article 66 states the main effect of passing risk to the buyer. Article 67~69 determine the decisive point in time which the risk passes from the seller to the buyer and article 70 attempts to explain the relation between passing of risk and fundamental breach of contract by the seller. As in the case corresponding Incoterms rules, the main issue to be resolved is which party should bear the economic consequences in the event that the goods are accidentally lost, damages or destroyed. Many cases also apply CISG articles 66~70 to contracts in which parties not agree on the use of trade terms such as CIF, CFR, FOB and FCA in Incoterms[R] 2010 Rule that provide for when the risk passes. In order to minimize disputes that may arise under contract, when drawing up a contracts for the international sale of goods, the specifics of agreement should be clearly stipulated. Consequently, the parties of contracts for the international sale of goods should take adequate measures, and it is required to prepare the contracts clearly as the specific terms to prevent and resolve contractual disputes on passing of risk.