• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.2332-2338
• /
• 2011

The economy of the EU left behind the U. S. economy in many different aspects and the gap is widening. One major reason that promoted the EU's leading position is the ability to continuously advancing industrial technology and therefor secures the EU's leading position through a high level of competitiveness. The role as a powerhouse of the technological development is nurtured by a systematic attempt of the EU commission to stimulate international cooperation. Although the EU is focussing its efforts on international cooperation between EU members states, nonmembers, namely Korea, can benefit from this policy as well and generate win-win outcomes for both cooperating partners. The paper aims in the first chapter to introduce international technological cooperations in general. The second chapter identifies the political approach of both countries towards technological cooperations. The third chapter introduces the research method. In the forth chapter is analyzed a case study of two cooperation projects between Japan and the EU. Finally, implications for Korean policy makers are given.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2014년도 춘계 학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.222-235
• /
• 2014

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국신재생에너지학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.151.1-151.1
• /
• 2010

우리나라의 신재생에너지 기술개발은 2008년 '저탄소 녹색성장' 국가 비전 선포 이후 국가 에너지 R&D 전략의 중심에 자리 잡고 있다. 이미 우리의 경쟁 대상인 선진국들은 신재생에너지 기술을 중심축으로 녹색산업을 신성장 동력으로 활용하고자 국력을 집중하고 있다. 우리나라는 선진국과 비교할 때 상대적으로 신재생에너지 기술개발 후발자이다. 기술적 핸디캡을 극복하고 대등한 경쟁에 뛰어들기 위해서는 신재생에너지 기술보유 선진국과의 국제협력을 통한 시너지효과 창출이 필요하다. 이는 최고수준의 국가 및 기관들과 협력을 도모함으로써 기술개발 기간 단축은 물론 조기 기술격차 해소가 가능하기 때문이다. 이러한 국가간 상호협력을 위해서는 무엇보다 기술 분야별 선진국 수준과 우리의 수준에 대한 객관적인 분석이 필요하다. 이를 위해 주요 신재생에너지 기술들을 대상으로 심층적인 전문가 조사를 통해 전세계 주요 국가 및 관련 업체들의 기술수준 및 협력 선호 유형을 분석하였다. 이에 더해 관련 기술 시장 상황을 고려하여 기술별 국제 협력 추진 전략을 시장주도형 모델과 공동연구형 모델로 나누어 수립하였다. 수립된 전략을 바탕으로 신재생에너지 기술 국제협력 활성화를 위한 정책 추진 방향을 제시하였다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.638-655
• /
• 2010

The importance of international science and technology cooperation is growing more and more, but we do not know much about what criteria could be used to choose a science or a technology that needs international cooperation first and foremost among many kinds of competing sciences and technologies. Moreover, this selection process is affected by evaluators' or science/technology experts' perception, but we do not quite know what they actually see when they evaluate the needs of international cooperation. This study investigates the conditions that international science and technology cooperation is encouraged by scholars and researchers in various areas. Based on theoretical arguments of Transaction Cost Economics, Measurement View, and Knowledge-Based View, we drew hypotheses on when experts perceive greater needs of international cooperation. Using the classification categories of 10 major sciences and technologies, we collected data from 151 respondents from scientists in research institutions and colleges. As a result, we found that experts in science and technology areas perceive strong needs of international cooperation when the importance of focal science or technology is high and the relative national level of focal science or technology is low. Also, we found that the importance and relative level of focal science and technology have positive moderating effects each other. Lastly, we found that when experts evaluate their own major areas, the strength of positive relationship between the importance of science and technology and needs of international cooperation is diminished.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.736-745
• /
• 2011

The economy of the EU left behind the US economy in many aspects and the gap is widening. One major reason that promoted the EU's leading position, is the ability to continuously advancing industrial technology and it's high level of competitiveness. The role as a powerhouse of technological development is nurtured by a systematic attempt of the EU commission to stimulate international cooperation. Although the EU is focussing its efforts on international cooperation between EU-member states, nonmembers, namely Korea, can profit from this policy as well and generate win-win situations for both cooperating partners. Despite the enormous benefits for the Korean economy that would result from close ties with the EU in terms of technological cooperation, academic research in this area is very sparse. The main focus of the Korean academic community has been on the US and Japan so far; the cooperation between Korea and the EU was rather ignored. The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the potential of technological cooperation between Korea and the EU. After an introduction, chapter 2 explains the technology and innovation policy of the EU. Chapter 3 introduces the Framework Program for Research and Technological Development of the EU. Chapter 4 focuses on small and middle sized businesses and examines EUREKA, the EU’s effort to coordinate pan-european research cooperation.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.604-633
• /
• 2016

In this study, we attempt to identify factors that influence the performances of Korean firms regarding global R&D cooperation, and to derive policy implications for performance improvement. The hypothetic influential factors include firms' general characteristics, purposes and types of cooperation, technology, partners and their countries, and government support. We categorize the performances of global R&D cooperation into technological, economic, and strategic performance, and analyze the effects of those factors on each of the performances as well as the overall performance. We use a standard tobit model for the overall performance, while using a multivariate tobit model for the other performances to reflect the possible correlations among them. The survey data was collected from 162 Korean firms that had previously conducted or were currently conducting global R&D cooperation.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 한국항해항만학회 2019년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.225-227
• /
• 2019

최근 국제표준화기구(ISO)에서 주력하고 있는 스마트선박 기술 연계 국제표준 동향을 살펴보고, 아국의 기술 및 산업현황을 분석함으로써 국제표준화시장에서 한국이 주도할 수 있는 기반을 마련하기 위한 대응전략을 수립하였다.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 한국산학기술학회 2012년도 춘계학술논문집 1부
• /
• pp.307-308
• /
• 2012

본 논문은 R&D와 국제기술협력을 함에 있어서 소비자를 활용하는 방안을 살펴보는데 연구의 목적을 두었다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• 제12권11호
• /
• pp.4835-4843
• /
• 2011

Europe outlined its technological development strategy in the "EU 2020 Strategy". The goal is to lift the EU's technological level above that of the United States or Japan. In particular the EU 2020 Strategy aims to make the EU the world's leading knowledge society. The research purpose of that article is to focus on international technological cooperation. Chapter two examines the EU's international technological cooperation approach. Chapter three analyses the EU 2020 Strategy in terms of development, background and content. Chapter four looks at the involved countries for technological cooperations and scrutinises possible policy alternatives. In chapter five is given a conclusion.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• 3호통권277호
• /
• pp.28-43
• /
• 2002

무기체계가 국내개발로 생산되었다 하더라도 이 무기체계의 핵심이 되는 기술 및 부품을 외국에 의존하여 개발하였다면 완전한 우리의 무기라 할 수 없고, 외국이 기술에 대한 통제력을 행사 한다면 그것은 곧 기술종속을 의미한다고 볼 수 있으며 예측할 수 없는 국제안보 환경하에서 기술종속은 곧 안보종속이 될 수 있기 때문에 주요무기체계의 핵심기술 확보는 국가안보를 위해 중요한 것이다. 그러므로 향후 우리 나라의 경우 국제협력연구개발 필요성은 증대될 것으로 전망된다. 그것은 주요 무기체계 개발을 위한 국내의 국방과학기술 수준을 볼 때 핵심기술이 미흡한 분야가 상당하므로 외국과의 협력을 필요로 하기 때문이다.