• Title/Summary/Keyword: 국유재산관리제도

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

A Study about the Improvement of State-Owned Properties Management - With a Focus on State-Owned Land - (국유재산관리제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구(국유지를 중심으로))

  • Lee, Kwi-Taek;Min, Guy-Sik
    • The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences
    • /
    • v.6 no.5
    • /
    • pp.739-748
    • /
    • 2011
  • As of 2010, the state owns $24,086km^2$ of land, which accounts for 24% of the nations total land area of $24,086km^2$. In the meantime, the state-owned national property management policies enacted laws changed since the variety has been showing up but still a problem. Also recently, on April 1, 2011 amendment, the state-owned property law enforcement in the front and relieve the problem somewhat, but still state-owned estates efficiently and economically as well as management and operation of the state not be public purpose and welfare of the people in order for there not being used as a reasonable choice still remains to be improved is Free.

Establishment of Old Imperial Estate and Cultural Property Management System -Focused on Inclusion of Imperial Estate as Cultural Property- (구황실재산 관리 제도에 대한 연구 -구황실재산의 문화재관리체계 편입 관련-)

  • Kim, Jongsoo
    • Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
    • /
    • v.53 no.1
    • /
    • pp.64-87
    • /
    • 2020
  • The cultural property management system of Korea was established based on the modern cultural assets acts and the old imperial estate management system enacted during the Japanese occupation. Academics have researched the cultural property management system oriented on the modern cultural assets acts, but few studies have been conducted into the old imperial estate management system, which is another axis of the cultural property management system. The old imperial estate was separated from the feudal capital by the Kabo Reform, but was dismantled during the colonial invasion of Japan and managed as a hereditary property of the colonial royal family during the Japanese colonial period. After establishment of the government, the Imperial Estate Act was enacted in 1954 and defined the estate as a historical cultural property managed by the Imperial Estate Administration Office. At this time, imperial estate property that was designated as permanent preservation property was officially recognized as constituting state-owned cultural assets and public goods in accordance with Article 2 of the Act's supplementary provisions during 1963, when the first amendment to the Cultural Property Protection act was implemented. In conclusion, Korea's cultural property formation and cultural property management system were integrated into one unit from two different sources: modern cultural assets acts and the old imperial estate property management system. If the change of modern cultural assets acts was the process of regulating and managing cultural property by transplanting and applying regulations from Japan to colonial Joseon, the management of the imperial estate was a process by which the Japanese colonized the Korean Empire and disposed of the imperial estate. Independence and the establishment of the government of the Republic of Korea provided the opportunity to combine these two different streams into one. Finally, this integration was completed with the establishment of the Protection of Cultural Properties Act in 1962.

Control of Records by the Residency-General and Japanese Invasion of Joseon (통감부의 기록장악과 조선침략)

  • Lee, Young-hak
    • The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
    • /
    • no.41
    • /
    • pp.213-260
    • /
    • 2014
  • This paper illustrates the process of Japanese invasion of Joseon. In the December of 1905, specifically, Japan established the Residency-General in order to reform systems of government and to control records. Japan founded the Residency-General to reinforce the internal affairs of Joseon. Then, they reorganized systems of government using Joseon's bureaucracy system. The reorganization facilitated control of current and non-current records. After all, this helped Japan to know the actual circumstances of Joseon and the invasion of Joseon. To be specific, Japan organized the records at the Kyujanggak, an imperial library of the Joseon Dynasty, for understanding historical records and dominated Joseon government's current records for comprehending vulnerability of Joseon. On the other hand, Japan invaded Joseon by justifying their actions as 'administration improvement' and 'reformation'. Here are the actual examples. First, the Residency-General dominated the Kyujanggak and reorganized historical records which were stored there. It lasted for two years and let Japan comprehend the course of Joseon history. Second, the Residency-General collected and arranged current records of Joseon. It was buckled down in the August of 1910, when the Great Han Empire collapsed. After the fall of the Great Han Empire, the Residency-General transferred government records from the Japanese Government-General of Korea in order to understand the state of Joseon. Last, the Residency-General arranged records on both governmental and the Imperial property, then most of them reverted to national property.