• Korea Real Estate Review
• /
• v.27 no.3
• /
• pp.87-102
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to compare the taxation equity of non-residential collective real estate based on its standard market prices set by National Tax Service and those for taxation set by the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs with that of the apartment houses in Seoul, South Korea. The study findings were as follows. First, the analysis results of the standard market price rates of non-residential collective real estate pointed to a huge gap in the assessment rate (AR) of the taxation standards among the Gu offices. Second, there was a big coefficient of dispersion (COD) in the standard market prices of non-residential collective real estate, which confirmed the presence of horizontal inequity. Finally, there was regressive vertical inequity, which leads to the undervaluation of high-value assets, in the standard market prices of non-residential collective real estate. The evaluation of the standard market prices of non-residential collective real state should thus reflect the market prices and the addition and assessment of the land and buildings to achieve taxation equity. Based on these findings, it is hoped that this study will make a significant contribution to the improvement of the official announcement system for non-residential real estate based on real transactions during the shift to such system.

• 주택과사람들
• /
• s.11
• /
• pp.71-83
• /
• 1991

[ $\bullet$ ] 정부는 지난해에 이어 올해에도 건설부, 국세청, 지방자치단체 등 관계기관 합동으로 전국의 3,255만필지 중 2,518만필지의 개별토지가격을 조사함. 3월 11일부터 5월 10일까지 개별토지가격을 조사$\cdot$산정하고 5월 22일부터 6월 11일까지 국민의 열람에 공하여 주민의견을 수렴한 다음 6월 29일까지 시장$\cdot$군수$\cdot$구청장이 결정할 계획임. 개별토지가격은 2월 28일 공시한 30만 표준지 공시지가를 기준으로 표준지와 개별토지의 특성을 비교하여 가격차를 수치화할 수 있도록 만든 토지가격비준표를 활용하여 산정함. $\bullet$ 조사된 개별토지가격은 토지초과이득세, 양도소득세, 증여세, 상속세의 부과를 위한 기준시가, 종합토지세 부과를 위한 토지등급의 결정, 택지초과소유부담금 및 개발부담금 산정기준, 토지거래허가 또는 신고시의 가격심사기준 등으로 활용됨. $\bullet$ 정부에서 매년 전국의 개별토지가격을 조사함으로써 공평과세를 이루고 90년 도입한 토지관련제도의 실효성을 거양하여 불필요한 토지보유 억제 및 지가안정에 기여하게 될 것임.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.41 no.3 s.114
• /
• pp.267-282
• /
• 2006

Korea officially appraises and publicizes three different values of the land and buildings for the same lot. The values are assessed by the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, and National Tax Service. A fundamental problem of this appraisal system is that the values of land and buildings are separately assessed, even though they are bought and sold as a single entity in the real estate market. In order to solve this problem, an alternative real estate assessment system should be developed by the central government.

• Korean Business Review
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study is to analysis of the policy and problems of the capital gain tax. So this study identified the problems in the tax system and the method, suggested some ideas that can be useful for reforming the current capital gain tax system. The followings are the concise of some ideas. First, government should adopt the housing market stabilization policy in the long-term period, not in the short-term period which depend on the financial market and the part of home supply. Second, determining the capital gains tax should be transferred to actual market prices system rather than based on the standard assessed prices by government through the nations. By doing so, the desired principles of taxation come true such as principle of taxation on economic substance, principle of taxation on solid foundation and principle of taxation on tax paying ability. Third, transaction taxes should be minimized in the aborting the property speculations and the stabilizing the actual market prices. Fourth, the system of non tax to the owners of 'one family, one house' should be excluded to the tune of principle of tax equity. By doing so, tax payers could be induced to pay taxes on a timely basis not commit to wrong doings. In conclusion, anti-speculation policy should be progressed in such a comprehensive and sustained way as to wipe out the psychology of expectation about the transfer gain's incomes.