• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.135-151
• /
• 2018

This study was conducted to help establish the status of comparative education as an academic discipline by investigating its relationship with educational evaluation. Comparative education as a subfield of education covers other areas of study in education, while educational evaluation is a study of methodology. First, international comparative study was investigated, and recent methodologies in educational evaluation were introduced. International comparative study started in 1960's, and is being expanded. The participating countries hope for better education by comparing their educational curricula and practices with others. For international comparative studies, a differential item functioning analysis as a multigroup analysis can provide information on what sociocultural factors other than the construct are affecting the measurement results. The study dataset has a hierarchical structure so that multilevel item response theory is suitable to obtain multidimensional national profiles. Although there have been methodological advances in educational evaluation, the methods are not available in comparative education. In order to reduce the gap, scholars in educational evaluation should try to make the methods easily available, while those in comparative education should try to use the exact and precise methods in their studies.

• 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.08a
• /
• pp.38-47
• /
• 2004

컴퓨터 과학에 대한 연구를 볼 때, 컴퓨터 과학의 순수 이론에 대한 연구가 대부분이며, 컴퓨터 과학을 교육하기 위한 교과 교육에 대한 연구는 다른 학문 분야에 비해 적은 실정이다. 이 논문에서는 교육 평가가 교수-학습, 학습과정, 학생의 학업 성취에 미치는 영향이 깊음을 인지하고, Conputing Curricula 2001에서 분류한 컴퓨터 내용학을 중심으로 각 내용학 영역이 궁극적으로 도달해야 할 평가 목표를 제시하고 컴퓨터 내용학이 지녀야 할 평가의 지향점을 찾아내고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.5
• /
• pp.221-228
• /
• 2019

General education of university is facing the problem of failing to perform its original educational function compared to major education. The most urgent step in solving this problem lies in the evaluation of general education, which is currently designed and implemented by each university. Therefore, this study is aimed at developing the evaluation tool for university general education. This study determined the allotting of evaluation tools by verifying the relative importance among the evaluation index through the AHP analysis method, away form the simple list of the evaluation index, which is the limit of the precedent researches. The results of AHP showed that the organization of general education was the most important, while the latter was the implementation and evaluation of general education. The index determined to be the highest weighting of the total 22 indexes was "appropriateness of course organization" with "appropriateness of general education's purpose" being ranked second.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2003

The present study aims at theoretically reviewing studies en the need of alignments among assessment, curriculum and instruction in order to implement the goals of mathematics education. This paper discusses about issues and models fer alignment between instruction and curriculum, and then mainly focuses on alignment of assessment with instruction and curriculum at two levels, classroom and large-scale assessment. It was pointed out that both many published standardized tests for large-scale assessment and classroom assessments failed to meet curricular goals and contents, and instructional methods. The findings imply that reform in mathematics education should not be driven by assessment, but be embedded in instructional practices.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.909-922
• /
• 2010

This paper deals with disparities in course evaluation between general and major courses of mathematics education. We provide concrete evidences which verify the mismanagement of the evaluation system and can be an impetus to a more rational one. We indicate the direction to which professors of mathematics education should head. Also those statistics obtained from the author's teaching of mathematics education and related subjects for twelve years are provided for the fact-finding of and improving the erroneous evaluation system.

• Journal of the International Relations & Interdisciplinary Education
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.31-47
• /
• 2021

This study intends to examine the indicators of Korean medicine education that are directly required in the field, in the process of developing and rationalizing the second cycle of evaluation and accreditation standards for the Colleges of Korean medicine and present indicators to the Korean medicine education community. To this end, we conducted the Delphi survey on six Korean medicine education experts, and the second cycle evaluation and accreditation standards were developed after verifying the validity of the contents and through a public hearing on three experts. Based on the research results of this study, we make the following suggestions: First, the support of Korean medical education institutions should be considered. The Korean medical education institution operates the Korean medicine hospital under each institution's name. Thus, criteria for evaluation shall be considered according to the number of beds and the support of schools. Second, for the second cycle of evaluation, all six members of the evaluation committee were professors of Korean medicine; however, in the future, each group of the evaluation committee needs to be composed of an external curriculum and evaluation experts to seek the evaluation focusing on education. Third, it is necessary to include curriculum and evaluation experts in the development stage of education programs and institutional evaluation and accreditation standards. Fourth, the experts of the curriculum should be included as the members of the curriculum development team of the College of Korean Medicine. This study is meaningful as a study to improve the quality of Korean medicine education.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.42-48
• /
• 1992

이 연구는 현존해 있는 다양한 임상평가도구의 신뢰도와 타당도에 관한 분석 서술 연구이다. Rines(1974)에 의하면 평가는 학습경험을 통하여 목적을 달성하는 지의 여부를 측정하는 것이라고 하였고 평가의 목적은 교육증진을 도모하며, 목표를 설정하고, 학생의 학습진행과정을 사정하여 학생들을 위한 프로그램을 사정, 개발시키는데 있다고 피력 하였다. 간호교육에는 실무교육이 많은 비중을 차지하고 있다. 또한 많은 간호교육자들은 실습평가에 있어 많은 어려움을 경첩하고 있다. 이러한 난해한 실습평가도구를 개발하기 위하여 선행된 우선순위로써 현존해 있는 다양한 평가도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 평가하는 것이 의의 있는 일이라 사료된다. 이 논문은 실습평가도구의 신뢰도와 타당도에 관심을 가진 임상지도교수나 간호교육자들을 대상으로 한 서술적 연구이다. 우선 간호교육평가에 있어서의 문제점을 분석하고 평가도구에 대한 전문가(Authority)의 의견을 피력한 다음 저자의 의견을 서술하였다. 결론적으로 현재까지 개발된 완전한 임상실습평가의 방법은 없다. 그러므로 현존해 있는 평가방법을 서술평가하고 문제점을 지적하므로써 질적인 평가도구개발에 도움을 줄 수 있다. 앞으로 간호교육자들이 각 문제점들을 보완하여 교육목적을 달성시킬 수 있는 효율적인 평가도구를 개발하는 것이 급선무이다.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.36 no.1
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 1997

수학교육에서 목표지향형 평가는 교육목표를 세분화시키고 목표한 평가 기준에 성취해야할 최저 수준에 입각해서 하는 평가이다. 일반적으로 수학교육의 목표에는 문제해결능력의 향상, 새로운 지도법의 개발, 교과과정의 개발 및 그 교과목의 시행과 추천하고자하는 평가법, 자력에 의한 발전적인 문제 해결지도와 수학적 사고력 향상에 있으며 그런 사고력 검정을 위한 문제 출제 및 문제 변별력 측정, 문제 해결 시도를 위한 효과적인 지도법의 개발 등은 모두 수학과의 목표지향형 평가의 개선에 유익한 시도로 인정되고 있다.(중략)

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.6
• /
• pp.159-171
• /
• 1997

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 2009

공학교육인증을 실시하면서 설계교육의 중요성을 인지하고 있다. 특히 종합설계의 경우 설계의 기능적 요소와 제한 요소를 반영하도록 하고 있다. 그런데 이전에는 설계교육을 체계적으로 하지 않아서 대학마다 설계교육과 평가방법에 대한 어려움을 가지고 있다. 본 논문에서는 종합설계 교과목 수행절차와 방법을 제시하고 이에 맞는 평가요소와 평가방법을 제시하고자 한다. 설계 수행절차에서는 설계의 기능적 요소와 제한 요소를 반영하여 설계를 진행하는 과정과 이 때 산출되는 결과물을 제시하여 설계 요소가 반영될 수 있도록 한다. 종합설계 교과목에 대한 평가는 팀별 평가와 개별 평가로 나누고 실제로 수행했던 평가 방법을 제안한다.