• 대학교육
• /
• s.128
• /
• pp.90-95
• /
• 2004

• 대학교육
• /
• s.128
• /
• pp.96-100
• /
• 2004

• 대학교육
• /
• s.57
• /
• pp.78-84
• /
• 1992

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• s.2
• /
• pp.46-51
• /
• 2002

• 대학교육
• /
• s.101
• /
• pp.40-48
• /
• 1999

• The Korean Nurse
• /
• v.25 no.1 s.134
• /
• pp.48-56
• /
• 1986

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2006.08a
• /
• pp.269-276
• /
• 2006

지식기반사회에서 장애우의 삶의 질 향상을 위한 인적자원 개발과 평생교육프로그램 개발이 필요하다. 이를 위해 장애우들에게 적합한 효과적인 인적 자원을 개발하고, 사회복지기관과 평생교육기관에서 이들의 삶의 질을 높여 원만한 사회일원으로서 생활하는데 도움이 될 수 있는 교육과정과 프로그램에 대한 실태조사를 하였다. 여기에서 나타난 문제점을 개선하여 평생교육의 방향을 제안하는 데 있다.

• Korean Journal of Comparative Education
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.245-265
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this research is to find the features of HLC institutional accreditation model and the implication on the second period institutional accreditation of Korea. This research focus on accreditation model, accreditation period, comprehensive evaluation, criteria, decision making for accreditation status and accreditation supporting system. This research draws following suggestions to the second period institutional accreditation of Korea. 1. The institutional accreditation should apply various accreditation models according to the features of institute. 2. The institutional accreditation should focus on the autonomous quality improvement of institute with the quality assurance. 3. The quantitative evaluation should be reduced and qualitative evaluation based on mission and objects should be reinforced. 4. The interim evaluation should be strictly enforced for quality improvement. 5. The government should enlarge reflection the results of accreditation on financial aid to universities. 6. The web-based accreditation supporting system interworking with "Higher Education in Korea" service is needed.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.221-236
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study is to improve the KESLI consortium by analyzing the status of participant organizations and their needs. A survey questionnaire including questions on consortium selection, management, and evaluation was distributed. The findings from the 179 responses indicate that the needs of the participants include issues related to the collection development policy, the cataloging of e-journals, user education, and evaluation. Therefore, KESLI should provide the following: (1) examples of collection development policy used for reference, (2) system development for e-journal cataloging, (3) materials and program guidelines for user education, and (4) education related to evaluation techniques for e-journal usages.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Environmental Edudation Conference
• /
• 2006.07a
• /
• pp.156-158
• /
• 2006