• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.33
• /
• pp.241-262
• /
• 2013

Nietzsche in the early 20th century, many Western thought came to China pushed the time, who want to reform the Chinese young intellectuals was a great welcome. Around 5.4 times writers representing China Journalism Guo Mo ruo Mao Dun and social needs of the times according to the spirit, according to their ideology, no tubes and four optional understand Nietzsche. Was acceptable, in the process, Nietzsche was transformed hem into various forms. In this paper, two Guo Mo ruo Mao Dun accept Nietzsche as Nietzsche socreated their own awards and also looked at these similarities and difference. Nietzsche Guo Mo ruo the remnants of the old feudal ideas and traditions were to break down and accept only select perspective. Nietzsche's self-discovery and individual liberty, and against the reality and accept the terms of loan 5.4 seconds, an ideal Nietzsche award was created. However Guo Mo ruo particular aspect of the acceptance of Nietzsche, whereas Nietzsche regarded as an extreme pessimist history, and his extreme caution and idealistic form of individualism was often criticized. Mao Dun the core ideas of Nietzsche 'Superman' and 'will power' noted. 5.4 All time view of life, a new morality must re-evaluate the need for a practical, based on the old tradition of Nietzsche completely against the spirit of rebellion was to have especially appreciated. But this was different Mao Dun Nietzsche and moral beliefs. What is the old morality Nietzsche corrupt, bourgeois morality and ethics, and was negative for democracy and freedom, Mao Dun dark realities facing the old Chinese feudal and traditional idea ofrevolution as a democrat were negative for. Guo Mo ruo Mao Dun optional for Nietzsche's acceptance was 5.4 times that contemporary needs can be met.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.123
• /
• pp.189-208
• /
• 2012

"관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)은 전국 말 직하황노도가(稷下黃老道家)의 문헌으로 중국철학사에 있어 매우 중요한 위치를 점하고 있다. 하지만 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)은 문헌과 저자에 대한 기록이 불확실하고 제자백가의 사상을 포괄적으로 수용 복잡한 사상체계를 형성하고 있기 때문에 오랜시간 사람들의 주목을 받지 못했다. 1940년대 학자들은 중국철학 사료를 다시 정리하였고 이때 곽말약(郭沫若)에 의해 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)의 명칭이 처음으로 등장하게 된다. 1994년 "직하황노학파적비판(稷下黃老學派的批判)"과 "송견윤문유저고"에서 곽말약(郭沫若)이 "관자(管子)" 가운데 "심술(心術)" 상하(上下), "백심(白心)", "내업(內業)"의 사편(四篇)를 송견(宋?)과 윤문(尹文)의 저작이라고 주장한 이래 고문헌의 출토와 더불어 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)는 다시 학계의 관심을 받기 시작한다. "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)의 저작 시기는 전국말로 추정된다. 이 시기는 사상의 르네상스라고 불릴 만큼 많은 학자들이 저마다의 독특한 논리들로서 당시의 사회의 문제점을 직시하고 그 해결방안을 모색하였던 시대였다. 농업생산력의 향상과 교통의 발달로 많은 지식인은 제(齊)나라의 직하(稷下)에 모여 전대의 역사적, 철학적 유산을 기반으로 심(心)과 도(道)에 관한 논의를 벌였고, 그 통합적 저작물이 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)이다. 때문에 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)는 전국시대 제자학(諸子學)을 총정리하는 종합서의 성격을 가진다. 본 연구의 목적은 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)에 나타나는 심(心)개념의 연구를 통해 전국말 직하황노도가(稷下黃老道家)의 심(心)에 대한 이해를 살펴보는데 있다. 이를 위해 먼저, "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)의 중심철학범주인 도(道), 기(氣), 정기(精氣)와 심(心)의 관계에 대하여 살펴보고, 다음으로 "관자(管子)" 사편(四篇)에 보이는 심(心)의 개념분석을 통하여 구체적인 심(心)의 구조와 기능에 대하여 탐색할 것이다. 그리고 마지막으로 심(心)과 그 수양론(修養論)에 대하여 검토할 것이다.

• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.37
• /
• pp.81-107
• /
• 2014

Freud's' discovery of the unconscious' is a great revolution. Because of this, human beings were able to get the opportunity to look into their inner than honest. Lu Xun and Guo Mo Ruo a pair of realism and romanticism literature representative of Chinese modern literature writers. They then absorb the psychoanalytic theory o Freud along with other Western zeitgeist, introduce them widely inliterary theory and creative practice, which was again. Lu Xun was reflected in the human world of the unconscious Freud uncovered on the basis of strict realism literary spirit, Guo Mo Ruo is in accordance with the romantic literary time for the purpose of 'art for art' depicting a man's inner psychological well did. Although Freud spirit they claim to social and literary artistry of literature based on different yarns in the Acceptance of analytical theory, has the characteristics of a common sentiment analysis method to express and describe the unconscious human potential. 5.4 When Lu Xun and Guo Mo Ruo China Journalism writers, including Freud's psychoanalytic theory has embraced the Enlightenment and the old feudal society was a major contribution to want to read exactly what the human inner hearing. Chinese modern literature writers have to accept sometimes positive, sometimes accepting the psychoanalytic theory was intellectually sharp criticism, which could be a great instrument in time to the 5.4 Enlightenment and psychological fiction novel further development.