• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.20-30
• /
• 2005

Recently, a new education paradigm 'Self-directed Learning' has attracted considerable attention. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has been recognized as methodology to help students expand scientific thinking and knowledge. improve applicability, develope critical knowledge, and creatively solve problems. There have been significant efforts to develope PBL-based courses in mechanical engineering. A new PBL-based, multi-disciplinary course 'Product Dissection and Design Reasoning' has been developed in this paper. The course examines the way in which products and machines work and is intended to show freshman or sophomore level students how fundamental physical principles relate to engineering practice through hands-on dissection experience : thus, the course emphasizes the importance of knowledge of the fundamental physics for design reasoning. The primary role of this course is to develop creative design manpower. This paper describes the philosophy and content of this course and presents results from one year of development.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.37 no.6
• /
• pp.1037-1049
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to explore how the flow of discourse move and their reasoning process in dialogic argumentation during group modeling on excretion. Five groups of three to four students in the second grade of a middle school participated in the modeling practice of a Gifted Center. Analysis was conducted on argumentation during the modeling activity in which students should explain how the waste product (ammonia) leaves the body. It was found that there was a sequential argumentative process-tentative consensus, solving the uncertainty, and consensus. There were several discourse moves - 'claim' and 'counterclaim' in the stage of tentative consensus, 'query' and 'clarification of meaning' in the stage of solving the uncertainty, and 'change of claim' in the stage of consensus. Students participated in the dialogic argumentation by constructing argument collaboratively for reaching a consensus. Critical questioning in the stage of solving the uncertainty and reasoning in the stage of consensus were the impact factors of dialogic argumentation. By answering the critical questions, students changed their claims or suggested new claims by defending or rebutting previous claims. Students justified group claims with diverse argumentation scheme and scientific reasoning to reach a group consensus. These findings have implication for science educators who want to adopt dialogic argumentation in science classes.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.26 no.8
• /
• pp.751-758
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to develop an inquiry analysis framework based on the features of earth science inquiry methodology and to analyze inquiry activities in the 8th grade 'Earth History and Diastrophism' unit by using this framework. The framework classified earth science methods as logical inference, hermeneutic, and historical methods, each of which was subdivided in consideration of its subordinate methods and characteristics. The analysis revealed that the logical inference method reflected in the unit as the 'abductive method' (70%) was used more frequently than the 'inductive' (23%) and 'deductive' (22%) methods. The hermeneutic method was found in terms of the 'forestructures of understanding' (92%), 'circular reasoning' (9%). and 'historical nature of human understanding' (17%). The historical method also used as the 'constructing proper taxonomy' (53%), 'adhering to the modem principle of uniformitarianism' (47%), and 'relic interpretation' (41%) were identified with ratios more fester than those for the 'place substituting for time in stage theorizing' (3%) and 'evaluating independent lines of inquiry for convergence' (3%).

• Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education
• /
• v.43 no.1
• /
• pp.170-184
• /
• 2024

This study focused on the practical research needed to improve elementary school science lesson plans. Specifically, a video clip-based pedagogical reasoning activity that included elementary student misconceptions was presented and the influences of this activity on preservice teachers' science lesson planning were assessed. First, the eight preservice teacher participants were asked to write a lesson plan for a dissolution and solution unit, after which a first semi-structured interview was conducted. Then, the participants participated in a video clip-based pedagogical reasoning activity. Based on the activity results, the participants revised their previously planned lessons, and second semi-structured interviews were conducted. The data from the preservice teachers' lesson plans and interview transcripts were analyzed using a constant comparative method to investigate the lesson plan changes. It was found that after the video clip-based pedagogical reasoning activity, the preservice teacher tightened the activity or changed the material to understand the students' thinking processes. In addition, they supplemented their goals and assessment criteria to accommodate the diverse students' thinking. Some also specified motivational strategies that considered student interests, motivation, and possible misconceptions. However, some preservice teachers still set goals that did not sufficiently account for student misconceptions and some planned the student assessments based only on the learning goals rather than the students' thinking. The few preservice teachers were able to develop motivational strategies that considered interest, motivation, and misconceptions. The preservice teachers claimed that they had difficulty predicting the misconceptions and connecting these to the lesson content. Discussions were then held to assist the preservice teachers to consider possible student misconceptions when planning their lessons.

• Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology
• /
• v.26 no.6
• /
• pp.776-780
• /
• 1994

Fuzzy reasoning was applied to sensory evaluation of cooked rice. A sensory attribute diagnostics was done in terms of tour kinds of attributes-texture, taste, odor and appearance which determine overall palatability. First, rating for the contribution level of each attribute to the overall palatability was asked as one of five scales-very important, important, moderate, slight and very slight. Secondly, the preference level of each attribute for a cooked rice sample was asked as one of five hedonic scales-excellent, good, fair, poor and very poor. Thirdly, the results of the scales were converted into fuzzy values and operated by fuzzy reasoning. Finally, the contribution and preference levels of the attributes were composed to infer the overall palatability of cooked rice sample.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.170-182
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to develop learning materials based on the Kepler's abductive reasoning and to identify high school students' rule-inferring strategies on the law of planetary motion. The learning materials including the concepts of solar magnetic field, conservation of figure skater's angular momentum and Kepler's polyhedral theory were developed and the questions about Kepler's 2nd and 3rd law of planetary motion were also created. The participants were 79science high school students and 83general high school students. The patterns and properties of their abductive inference were analyzed. The findings revealed that the students showed 'incomplete analogy abduction', 'analogy abduction' and 'reconstruction' to generate the hypotheses concerning the Mars' motion related to the solar magnetic field. There were more general high school students who showed the incomplete analogy abduction than science high school students. On the other hand, there were more science high school students who showed the analogy abduction and reconstruction strategy than general high school students. Also, they showed 'incomplete analogy abduction', 'analogy abduction' and 'model construction and manipulation' to generate the hypotheses concerning Kepler's second law. A number of general high school students showed the incomplete analogy. It is suggested that because the analogy of figure skater cause the students' alternative framework to use, more detailed demonstration is necessary in class. In addition, students combined Kepler's polyhedral theory with their prior knowledge to infer Kepler's third law.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.06b
• /
• pp.13-15
• /
• 2006

과학기술 연구분야에서 인력, 기관 등의 연구 주체와 논문, 과제, 지적재산권 등의 성과에 대한 온톨로지는, 시맨틱 웹 환경에서 이질적 과학기술 연구정보의 의미적 통합과 자동화된 유통, 그리고 암묵적 지식의 추론을 가능케 할 것이다. 이 논문에서는 현재 한국과학기술정보연구원에서 개발 중인 국가과학기술 R&D 기반정보 은톨로지를 소개하고, 그의 응용으로써 은톨로지에 내재된 암묵적 지식들을 규칙을 사용하여 추론하는 과정의 기술에 중점을 둔다. 상기 은톨로지는 인스턴스의 유일성 확보를 위해 URI(Uniform Resource identifier)서버에 기반하여 온톨로지 인스턴스에 고유한 URI를 할당하는 데 중점을 두고 설계되었으며, 논문의 특정순위저자를 모델링한 저작자정보 클래스를 은톨로지 스키마 상에 명시적으로 표현한다는 특징이 있다.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.51-62
• /
• 1999

This paper proposes a fuzzy Petri net representation to represent the fuzzy production rules of a rule-based expert system. Based on the fuzzy Petri net representation. we present a fuzzy reasoning algorithms which consist of forward and b backward reasoning algorithm. The proposed algorithms. which use the proper belief evaluation functions according to fuzzy concepts in antecedent and consequent of a fuzzy production rule. are more closer to human intuition and reasoning than other methods. The forward reasoning algorithm can be represented by a reachability tree as a kind of finite directed tree. The backward reasoning algorithm generates the backward reasoning path from the goal to the initial nodes and then evaluates the belief value of the goal node using belief evaluation functions.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.655-672
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to investigate information sources and types of reasoning that non-astronomy major undergraduate students used to build their mental models on the mechanism of the Moon craters formation. In-depth interview was used to collect qualitative data, and the questions for the interview were developed through an analytical induction method. We interviewed four students individually by using Seidman's interview step. The findings revealed that the participants built nonscientific mental models, and yet they held a consistent explanatory framework. The students explained that the crater was made by the fall of a meteorite. They all suggested a similar shape of meteorite even though their drawings about the shape of craters and its related to variables were different from one another. The information sources that the participants used fur their explanatory frameworks were varied, i.e., daily experiences, subject knowledges, and intuition. In addition, they used causal reasoning, intuitional reasoning, knowledge based reasoning, and analogical reasoning.

• Journal of the Korean earth science society
• /
• v.42 no.1
• /
• pp.118-131
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of evidence-based reasoning practiced by middle school gifted students. Data were collected through an online task in which middle school students in gifted education institutes of a university located in the metropolitan area, Korea, performed inquiry about the shape of a planet's orbit. The students were given data of Mercury's greatest elongations and asked to draw the planet's orbit with the data. Each of the students was also asked to provide his or her hypothesis of Mercury's orbit before the drawing and to reason about the orbit again using his or her own drawing as evidence. The content analysis of the students' reports revealed 5 different types of judgement about the shape of Mercury's orbit, 4 types of reasoning about the hypothesis and evidence, and the characteristics of evidence-based reasoning within the judgement types. Based upon the analysis results, the importance of proper interpretations of evidence in evidence-based reasoning, the core role of the theory-evidence coordination, and the usefulness of working with multiple hypotheses were discussed. In addition, implications for earth science education were suggested.