• Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX
• /
• v.50 no.2
• /
• pp.203-219
• /
• 2020

The primary purpose of this study is to identify spatial distribution patterns of co-authoring activities in Korean cadastral science. The analysis showed that a small number of researchers played an essential role in the Korean cadastral co-authorship network. In particular, some authors not only had a significant influence on other nodes in the network but also served as intermediaries between researchers. Moreover, the distance between researchers influenced co-authorship decisions to a limited extent. This study differs considerably from previous studies in that it used spatial analysis techniques to identify spatial distribution patterns of co-authoring activities. However, this research is limited in that it applied only 2019 data to determine the spatial distribution pattern of co-authoring activities. We can overcome this limitation if we analyze the spatial distribution patterns of co-authoring activities using multi-year data in future studies.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.50 no.6
• /
• pp.641-657
• /
• 2015

Nowadays research collaboration between the business, academic and governmental community is high on the policy agenda in all over the world, especially with regard to science-based technological innovation. The aim of this paper is to explore some of the changing spatial patterns of research collaboration by carrying out bibliometric analysis of co-authorship publications in major international and scientific journals that are jointly realized by Korean scientists and researchers in the seven science-based technologies for the period 2002~2012. Using the co-authored papers as an indicator of research collaboration with the institutional address of each co-authoring researcher and the geographic location of their affiliation, this paper describes some trends and patterns of domestic and international research collaborations. Identifying a rapid increase in the volume of co-authored papers and the trend towards multiple authorships over the last decade, the paper finds collaborative scientific research to be geographically dispersed at the different spatial scales. Despite the rising geographic dispersion of research collaboration within the nation, this paper finds that there were empirical evidences for the presence of localized knowledge production processes at regional level, and biased knowledge flows towards core areas with advanced research resources.

• 종축개량
• /
• v.11 no.3 s.61
• /
• pp.90-94
• /
• 2006

(이 내용은 Paul Fricke와 Steven Stewart가 공동 저술한 내용으로 Hoard's Dairyman 1월호에 게재된 내용이다)

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.205
• /
• pp.3-3
• /
• 1997

유럽대륙과 영미철학의 큰 흐름 사이에서 다문화시대에 걸맞은 세계의 철학이 국내에 소개되리라 본다. 기술과 진보에 대한 문명비판적 검토, 자연과 인간의 조화 속에 생태학적 균형을 모색하는 작업 등 다각적인 영역에서의 공동연구 작업은 계속 요청될 것이다.

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• v.7 no.12
• /
• pp.64-65
• /
• 2008

(주)애즈랜드(대표이사 최현수)가 주최하고 동국대학교 RIS사업단이 주관한 출판기념회 및 세미나가 지난 11월 5일 서울 중구 PJ호텔에서 개최됐다. '인쇄혁명, PDF 프린팅'이 라는 제목의 출판기념회는 최현수 사장과 PDF 전문가 이능모 씨가 공동 저술했다. 동국 대학교 RIS사업단의 사업 일환으로 발간된 이 책자는 최근 인쇄업계의 화두로 떠오른 인쇄산업에서의 PDF 활용 방안에 대해 자세히 설명하고 있다.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.34 no.10 s.389
• /
• pp.20-22
• /
• 2001

'과학문화'와 관련된 일련의 논의와 움직임은 다소 늦은 감이 있지만 바람직한 일이다. 우리 사회에서는 과학은 정신적 가치와는 무관하며 일반문화와 유리될 것이라는 인식이 지배적이다. 그러나 인문학이나 예술과 마찬가지로 과학은 그 자체로 인간적 요소를 내포한 인류 공동의 문화유산임을 우리는 명심해야 할 것이다.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.15 no.4
• /
• pp.493-514
• /
• 2012

Research collaboration between industry and universities is high on many policy agenda's nowadays, especially with regard to science-based technological innovation. Nonetheless, there have been few attempts at examining large-scale systematic and quantitative data on the nature and extent of university-industry collaborations. The objective of this paper is to explore the patterns and trends of research collaborations between universities and companies for scientific knowledge production in the seven science-based technologies. This paper uses co-authored articles published in major scientific journals in the world as an indicator of collaborative scientific research between universities, companies and governmental research institutes. The tens of thousands of co-authorship papers in the northeast region in the US over the years 2006 to 2010 were analyzed for collaboration patterns and their spatial characteristics. This paper finds that there were increases both in the proportions of multiple authored, particularly five or more, papers, and in the volume of international collaborations. By examining a type of collaborations between different institutions, research collaboration between universities and companies in this region is relatively high share at national level. This suggests that the national or even international scale seems more appropriate for innovation policies.

• Journal of KIISE:Computing Practices and Letters
• /
• v.5 no.5
• /
• pp.574-582
• /
• 1999

Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW) systems for cooperaton in distributed computing environment are used in many fields such as on-line approval, co-authoring, co-decision making, and so on. There have been many researches on co-drawing tools of the CSCW system, because they can be used in communication, co-design, and education. However, the existing tools are not flexible in system architecture and concurrency control. In this paper, we present "autonomous object," which includes concurrency control policy and information about its view. And we developed a new CSCW system with flexible system architecture.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.300-330
• /
• 2018

Enterprises' participation in the collaboration research is one of the effective and typical methods through which technologies go into the market or are transferred to other sectors. This study reviews enterprises' participated collaboration research and analyzes their network for disaster and safety management area. From 2005 to 2016, 786 technical papers from four representative journals for disaster and safety management in Korea are compiled based on the authors whose affiliations are from enterprises. During the research period, collaboration research is found to be in an increasing trend in general. However, the number of technical papers with three or less authors is in a decreasing trend, whereas that with four or more authors is in an increasing trend. This fact implies that the range of enterprises' collaboration research is widening. Technical paper productivity and each entity's collaboration network are evaluated using participation-weight based author score. Over the research period, a few universities, which attract most of the enterprises, are found to have higher productivities and centralities. Public enterprises show higher participation weights. Also, sectors such as construction, engineering, and electronics demonstrate higher weights. This study is particularly meaningful because enterprises' participation status in collaboration research for disaster and safety management area is systematically analyzed for the first time in Korea. The network analysis result from this study will be especially helpful in establishing technology transfer strategy.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.50 no.3
• /
• pp.23-47
• /
• 2019

In order to ascertain disciplinary differences in publication patterns that can help improve assessment of research performance in Korea, we analyzed the bibliometric data of six disciplines from Korea Citation Index. Results showed differences in research size, competitiveness, productivity, impact, and collaboration among disciplines. Disciplines in science were the largest in terms of author and institution followed by humanities and social science, but humanities produced the most publications per author, followed by social science and science disciplines. Sociology publications received most citation per paper but humanities received most citations per author, which was greatly influenced by the number of co-authors per paper. Distribution of author counts per paper varied widely across disciplines. Humanities were dominated by single-author publications, whereas the majority of publications in sciences were co-authored. The study also highlighted differences in citation lag time and illustrated differences in distribution and impact of core authors and institutions across disciplines.