• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.89-111
• /
• 2000

Welfare-to-work으로 표현되는 근년의 미국 복지 환경의 급속한 변화는 공적 부문 사회복지인력의 역할 변화를 요구하고 있다. 강력한 민간 사회복지의 전통에 밀려 역할과 기능이 상대적으로 미약했던 미국의 공공복지부문은 지난 100여 년간 상당한 정체성 혼란을 겪어왔고 공공복지에서의 사회복지사의 역할과 기능은 해결되지 않는 논점이었다. 이 글에서는 뉴딜에서부터 미국사회복지의 일대 변혁이라고 일컬어지는 1996년의 복지개혁입법 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act 까지, 미국 공적부조(public assistance)의 변화와 이 부문 실천가들의 역할 변화에 주목하고자 한다. 신연방주의, 복지다원주의 등으로 대표되는 복지환경의 변화에 대해 공공부문 사회복지의 변혁과 발전방향, 그리고 미국 공공부문 사회복지사들의 정체성에 관한 고단한 탐색 작업은 국민기초생활보장법의 통과로 예상되는 우리나라 공공복지의 변화와 직업적 정체성 고민을 거듭하고 있는 공공복지 인력인 사회복지전문요원들의 역할에 대한 시사점들을 읽어내는데 도움이 될 것이다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.505-515
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to identify the characteristics and differences in the perception of professionalism of workers in public and private social welfare institutions, and to understand the effect of professionalism perception on job commitment and performance. The main results and implications are as follows. First, there was a statistically significant difference in the perception of professionalism of public and private social workers. Specifically, private 3.26 and public 3.15 were higher in the recognition of professionalism of social workers working in the private sector than in the public sector. Second, both public and private social workers' perception of professionalism had an effect on job commitment and job performance. In other words, the higher the recognition of professionalism, the higher the job commitment and performance of both private and public sector workers. Third, workers in the private sector were higher in both job commitment and job performance than those in public institutions. In short, although professionalism perception affects the job commitment and performance of private and public workers, the job commitment and performance of private social welfare organizations with high professionalism awareness is high.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.12
• /
• pp.257-272
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to investigate practical measures to provide a better welfare services in public sector through analyzing differences according to socio-demographic characteristics about the quality service of public welfare that social welfare officials perceive personally. The questionnaire has been conducted among 401 social welfare officials with 5 factors: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, empathy and assurances. With the results, the age was the most conspicuous difference in five factors of quality service in general. The quality of welfare service appears lower level as the official works close to community members. Additionally, the analysis shows that social welfare officials have relatively low perception about reliability, responsiveness and empathy. The official in charge of social welfare needs to have a neighborhood-centered value orientation, and be a social worker and official in the field of substantive welfare. Therefore, this study has a meaning to suggest some directions of social welfare transition and basic delivery system by identifying their understanding.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.68 no.1
• /
• pp.5-22
• /
• 2016

We examined how public social expenditure and individual socio-demographic factors affect individual voluntary activities(volunteering, giving). Hierarchical linear model(HLM) was employed to a nested data set with 37,648 individual subjects and 16 local governments in Korea. HLM analyses yield an insignificant direct effect of public expenditure to volunteering and giving, while individual factors all have significant effects on them. Finally, this study discussed why public social expenditure factor does not have significant influence in this data, and suggested policy implications for promoting volunteering and giving.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.207-221
• /
• 2006

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1999.10a
• /
• pp.95-120
• /
• 1999

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.57 no.1
• /
• pp.387-408
• /
• 2023

This study aims to discuss the necessity of providing welfare service information in public libraries, and to seek methods to efficiently collect, select, and provide welfare information. To conduct the research, literature review, case study, survey, and interview were conducted. It was revealed that 86.7% of the research participants agreed with the provision of welfare information in public libraries. Welfare information can be divided into four types according to the subject of production. The collection and selection of welfare information differs according to the four types of the information. Libraries provide welfare information with different components of the information depending on the types of the information and libraries. Welfare information is provided through the library homepage, and in this case, welfare information is posted on the homepage using the form of a web page and a bulletin board.

• Journal of Families and Better Life
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.189-198
• /
• 1995

이 연구는 공공가정의 개념을 정립하고, 공공가정론의 기본구성가 내용을 살펴봄으로써 가정관리학에서 공공가정론을 도입, 전개시킬수 있는 실천적 토대를 제시하고자 한다. 특히 공공가정이 가정복지의 한 실천수단이 된다는 의미에서, 기존의 가정복지에 대한 논의와 관련하여 공공가정의 정체성을 파악하고, 공공가정론의 연구방향성을 중심으로 공공가정이라 는 연구대상에 대하여 집중적으로 고찰하고자 한다.

• 한국사회정책
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.75-101
• /
• 2018

The purpose of the study was to examine the difference of housing welfare outcomes between public rental housing and market rental housing. Housing welfare is defined as living at adequate, affordable housing with stability and measured as substandard housing, unaffordable housing, unstable housing. This study was based on 2016 Housing Fact Finding Survey, sampled the households which their incomes are below 120% average income of city workers. This study controlled the socio-economic characters of householders to identify the difference of housing welfare performance between public and market rental housing. The study showed the ratios of public rental housing of substandard housing and unaffordable housing are not low. But It is revealed that the achievements of housing welfare of the public rental housing are better than market rental housing and the differences between them are more consistent after controlling the socio-economic characters of householders. The problems of substandard housing, unaffordable housing and unstable housing in market rental housing are more than public rental housing. This study provides the basis that the regulation for market tenant protection should be reinforced and the policy of public housing should be expanded and improved for housing welfare.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare
• /
• v.33
• /
• pp.396-420
• /
• 1997