• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 2005.02a
• /
• pp.57-84
• /
• 2005

기관평가제도는 경영관리과정의 최종단계로 평가결과에 의한 인센티브 부여와 피드백과정을 갖는 경영관리의 중심분야 임에도 불구하고 아직까지 정부출연연구기관의 기관평가제도에 대한 유효성 평가에 대한 실증연구가 없는 실정이다. 본 연구에서의 기관평가제도의 유효성에 대한 평가는 기관평가지표가 기관성과를 평가하기에 적절하게 구성되었는지의 여부와 연구기관의 의견이 반영되었는지 여부로 검증하였다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 다음과 같은 세부적인 방법론을 사용하였다. 첫째, 연구기관의 특성분석과 선행연구를 통하여 연구기관의 BSC 모형을 도출하였다. 둘째, 출연 연구기관의 특성을 고려하여 관점을 도출한 후 전문가를 통한 델파이법(Delphi Method)으로 관점을 확정하였다. 셋째, 기존 평가제도에서 평가지표의 가중치(weight)를 분석하여 관점별로 분류한 후 BSC 형태로 재조정하여 기존 평가제도의 유효성을 분석하였다. 넷째, 피평가자의 설문조사를 통하여 피평가기관의 의견이 반영된 평가지표의 유효성을 분석하였다. 기존 평가제도의 평가지표와 연구기관의 의견이 반영된 평가지표가 BSC 모형에서 적절하게 구성되었는지 분석하기 위하여 연구기관의 BSC 관점간의 가중치가 기존 평가제도와 연구기관의 의견이 반영된 평가지표에 반영되었는지 검증하였다. 연구결과 기초 ${\cdot}$ 원천 연구에 주력하는 기초기술연구회, 산업화 ${\cdot}$ 상업화 연구에 주력하는 산업기술연구회, 공공성 ${\cdot}$ 대형연구에 주력하는 공공기술연구회간에는 미션과 특성이 다르기 때문에 검증결과 관점간의 가중치가 다르게 나타났다. 따라서, 현행 기관평가제도는 연구기관의 특성과 미션을 고려한 유효한 평가제도로 볼 수 있겠다. 연구기관의 의견이 반영되었는지 여부는 기존 평가제도와 연구기관의 의견이 반영된 평가제도를 대상으로 관점간 가중치의 우선순위로 검증하였다. 연구결과 관점간 가중치의 우선순위가 동일할 경우 현행 평가제도는 연구기관의 의견이 반영되었다고 볼 수 있으나, 검증결과 관점간 가중치가 다르게 나타났다. 또한, 추가적인 분석에서 연구회별 관점의 가중치와 소속 연구기관별 관점의 가중치를 분석한 결과 일부 연구기관에서는 연구회의 가중치와달리 나타났다. 따라서, 현행 기관평가제도는 일부 연구기관의 특성이 충분히 반영되지 않아서 유효한 평가제도로 볼 수 없다고 하겠다. 본 연구의 결과에 따라 출연연구기관의 기관평가지표에 대한 각 지표별 가중치와 지표 문항 개선시 유용한 자료로 활용되리라 본다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.43 no.3
• /
• pp.31-58
• /
• 2009

In the digital information environment records have an even closer relationship with business processes and become a core element of organizations' managerial activities. In practice, management is represented as congregation of business outcomes. The importance of records management is increasingly emphasized in terms of organizations' compliance, knowledge-management and risk management. However, there is currently no academic discussion on a between records management and managerial activities. In this context, the study has the notion that this should be defined and acknowledged for public institutions' effective records management. Based on the Malcolm Baldrige Model and ISO 15489, the study discusses a close between records management and management quality. The records management elements of the Malcolm Baldrige model and the managerial quality elements of ISO 15489 were analyzed. Based on the analysis, both common and neglected elements were explored in terms of records management.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.1-28
• /
• 2016

A public enterprise is part of the public sector, and public enterprises possess entrepreneurship. However, the characteristics of a public enterprise have not been reflected in the public records management system. In 2011, the ISO 30300 Series, a records management system, was developed. This indicates a more comprehensive management approach with regard to records management. Moreover, an introduction of the certification system of the ISO 30300 Series is expected. Therefore, this study reviews the characteristics of public enterprises and the necessity of introducing a records management system as well as analyzes the factors for its introduction. It also suggests an improved evaluation index and the requirements for public records management.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.16 no.4
• /
• pp.121-148
• /
• 2016

MSR identifies that records are key factors in achieving the goals of an organization and that records management is part of the business administration. Therefore, organizations could secure accountability and continuity of works through the activities of production and management records. This study explored what should be prepared to adopt MSR in public institutions based on the analysis of the requirements of the ISO 30301. which is prepared to be utilized as a certificate system. It focuses on 1) how laws could be supplemented to adopt MSR by comparing the requirements of MSR and the Public Records Management Act; 2) what should be prepared by organizations in terms of their rules and procedures; and 3) how the evaluation system of public institutions and the records management evaluation system could be revised to ensure that MSR will be sufficiently implemented in the organizations. In conclusion, the part to be supplemented by the law, the area to be operated as the internal rules of the organizations, and the way to be reflected in the evaluation of the public institutions were suggested.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.19 no.12
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to analyze the efficiency of the policy direction to see if the government's purpose of relocating public institutions was achieved by analyzing the case of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, which moved to Busan Metropolitan City in 2014. Based on the Korea Housing Finance Corporation's settlement management disclosure and public institution performance evaluation report from 2009 to 2019, efficiency was compared and analyzed using DEA analysis, work efficiency in management performance evaluation report, and financial ratio. The analysis results are as follows. First, in the case of DEA analysis, the difference in efficiency before and after fat transfer was not noticeable. Second, the efficiency analysis using the performance evaluation report and the financial ratio showed that the efficiency decreased after local relocation. Taken together, in the case of the Korea Housing Finance Corporation, efficiency decreased after local relocation, which can be attributed to sluggish business performance and inefficiency related to financial ratios. However, this study has limitations because it conducted an analysis on the Korea Housing Finance Corporation. To compensate for this, it is necessary to diversify the scope of research targeting all fund-managed quasi-governmental institutions in Korea. Nevertheless, this study is the first study to analyze before and after the relocation of fund-managed quasi-governmental institutions, and is expected to provide significant implications for future policies to be discussed.

• KAPE Magazine
• /
• s.155
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 2009

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.75-81
• /
• 2007

The BSC methodology has recently increased its capability to apply the all of industries. However, this methodology would be inappropriate for the business innovation of public organizations. The major reason is that the profit is not the main issue for the public sector, where the financial perspectives are not clearly stated or formulated. This difference compared to profit organizations influences other perspectives such as study and growth, process. Therefore, a new approach is needed to solve these problems. The purpose of this study is to investigate a pertinent scheme for the public innovation, the method to integrate the process, and its expected effectiveness. Our research also covers the analysis configuration, approach to the process, and its related benefits

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.4 no.2 s.8
• /
• pp.103-127
• /
• 2004

This paper analyzes the strategic planning process of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) including its center, GSFC (Goddard Space Flight Center) in the framework of strategic planning in publicly funded R&D organizations. To construct this framework, theories have been considered mainly focused on strategic management and planning, its application on public sector, and characteristics of R&D activities. As a result, the framework could be set up in accordance with the process of strategic planning. Also, as a case study, we explored the practice of strategic planning process and organizational implementation of NASA and GSFC. During the analysis on the strategic process of NASA and GSFC, we could draw some lessons out as follows: First, we should consider the differences between private and public sectors when we establish strategic planning in public sector. Second, the stakeholder analysis should be involved in setting the mission, goals, and strategies of an organization. Third, it is necessary to identify and assess the socio-economic effects or public benefits by R&D programs of the organization and use the feedback on its goal. Fourth, to implement strategic planning effectively, planning process should be closely integrated with the management process such as setting goals, securing budgets, and evaluating the organization. Conclusively, the analysis on NASA and GSFC contribute to implementing strategic planning in publicly funded R&D organizations by providing the appropriately modified framework. As an extension of this study, more deliberate analysis on various practices of strategic planning and performance indicators should be followed.

• KAPE Magazine
• /
• s.250
• /
• pp.4-6
• /
• 2017

'2016년 일반행정 부문 우수상'을 수상한 이동희 과장은 축평원의 핵심부서인 전략기획팀에서 약 6년여 이상을 예산업무를 중심으로 미래전략, 인력, 정부3.0, 공공기관 방만경영, 위기관리, 국정감사 수감, 수수료 등 다양한 업무를 담당하고 있는 자타공인 축평원의 인재다. 기관 설립 이후, 전략기획팀의 최장 근무기간 역사를 만든 것 같아 감회가 새롭다는 그는 기관을 위해 제 역할을 할 수 있는 기회가 주어진데 항상 감사하다고 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Health Policy and Administration Conference
• /
• 1999.05a
• /
• pp.49-79
• /
• 1999