• Digital Contents
• /
• no.2 s.117
• /
• pp.88-97
• /
• 2003

새로운 기술의 도입은 저작권 제도를 변화시키고 있다. 인쇄술의 발전에 따라 저작권의 보호에 대한 법제화가 이루어 졌고, 방송기술의 도입에 따라 방송권, 영화기술의 발전에 따라 영화에 대한 권리, 사진기술의 발전에 따른 사진에 대한 권리, 인터넷 등 정보통신 기술의 발전에 따라 전송권이 새로운 저작권자의 저작재산권의 한 유형으로 편입되고 있다. 이렇듯 저작권법은 기술의 발전에 따라 새로운 유형의 권리를 정책적 견지에서 수용하고 있으며, 앞으로도 예견되지 못한 기술의 출현에 따라 법의 개정은 이루어질 개연성이 크다.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.8 s.282
• /
• pp.62-71
• /
• 2002

원가계산체계의 문제점을 개선하기 위하여 원가계산기준의 심의.적용건의.유권해석을 위한 원가계산기준 심의 기구 설립과 관련규정의 원가인정범위 확대를 위한 법규 및 실무규칙 개정이 필수적이다. 전통적 원계산시스템을 보완할 새로운 원가계산시스템의 수용 미 개발, 정교한 원가시스템 측정에 의한 원가인정, 방산업체의 경영환경 변화에 능동적으로 대처할 수 있고 간접비의 비중 증가의 수용을 고려한 원가보상 개념의 정립과 합리적인 배분기준에 의한 제비율 산정이 개선되어야 한다. 신규 및 첨단무기체계의 투자기회 부여와 업체의 노력에 대한 성과를 반영하고 경쟁확대 측면에서 확정계약의 유인을 위한 차등 이윤적용에 따른 현실적인 이윤산정체계의 개선이 이루어져야 한다.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.12
• /
• pp.277-293
• /
• 1999

As the CISG has been legislated for a new legal system playing roles as uniform rules which govern international sale of goods, it requires appropriate criterion of interpretation. The Convention distinguishes between two levels of interpretation. One concerns the interpretation of the rules of contract law contained in the CISG itself, and the other the interpretation of specific statements or the conduct of the individual parties to a transaction.

• THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
• /
• v.71
• /
• pp.1-36
• /
• 2016

Unlike continental European legal systems (civil law systems), specific performance in common law refers to an equitable remedy requiring exactly the performance that was specified in a contract. It usually granted only when money damages would be an inadequate remedy and the subject matter of the contract is unique. Thus, under common law specific performance was not a remedy, with the rights of a litigant being limited to the collection of damages. Consistent with the practice in civil law jurisdictions, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) makes specific performance the normal remedy for breach of a contract for the sale of goods. Therefore, the buyer may require a breaching seller to deliver substitute goods or to make any reasonable repair. Likewise, the sellermay require the buyer to taker delivery of goods and pay for them. Despite this, Article 28 of the CISG restricts the availability of specific performance where it would be unavailable under the domestic law of the jurisdiction in which the court is located. Thus, the CISG's more liberal policy toward specific performance is restricted by common law. There are some legal issues in CISG's specific performance availability by Article 28. This paper analyzes these issues as interpreting Article 28 of CISG, by examining various theories of application to actions for specific performance and comparing CLOUT cases involving CISG Article 28.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.163-199
• /
• 2010

A frequent flyer program is a loyalty program offered by many airlines. Typically, airline customers enrolled in the program accumulate frequent flyer miles corresponding to the distance flown on that airline or its partners. There are other ways to accumulate miles. In recent years, more miles were awarded for using co-branded credit and debit cards than for air travel. Acquired miles can be redeemed for free air travel; for other goods or services, such as travel class upgrades, airport lounge access or priority bookings. The first modern frequent flyer program was created Texas International Airlines in 1979. This program was also adopted in Korean Air in 1984. Since then, the mileage programs have grown enormously. As of June 2009, the total member of two national airlines in Korea had been over thirty million. However, accumulated miles could be burden of airlines, because the korean corporations should record the annual financial report the accumulate mileage on a liability account by 'the international financial report standards(IFRS)' next year. The korean airlines need to minimize the accumulated miles, so that for instance Korean Airlines SKYPASS-miles expire 5 years after being earned. It means that miles earned on or after July 2008 will expire after five years if unredeemed. Thus, this paper attempt to analyze the unfairness of the mileage rules of korean airlines by examining a specific portion of the conditions relating to consumer protection, because many mileage users has difficulties using mileage programs and complained the amendment of the mileage rules. In conclusion, the contemporary mileage rules in Korea are rather unsatisfactory, because airlines is not only recognizing a mileage into a kind of benefit but also denying inheritance of mileage and the legal nature of mileage as a property right. It is necessary to amend relevant mileage rules in view of consumer protection, because air mileage is not simple benefit but a right of mileage user.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.481-511
• /
• 2012

Incoterms 2010 Rules consist of 11 rules. The 11 rules are presented in "rules for any mode or modes of transport" and "rules for sea and inland waterway transport". The each rule of Incoterms 2010 rules has the guidance note, 10 articles(A1~A10) in relation to the seller's obligations and 10 articles(B1~B10) in relation to the buyer's obligations. The A6 and B6 of Incoterms 2010 rules, likewise previous Incoterms rules, have the article of allocations of costs. These articles of Incoterms 2010 rules provide the allocation of costs between the seller and the buyer. According to These A6 and B6, in principle, the seller must pay all costs relating to the goods until they have been delivered in accordance with A4, and the buyer must pay all costs relating to the goods from the time they have been delivered as envisaged in A4. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to analyze the clauses of allocation of costs in Incoterms 2010 and to provide the problems of the clauses.

• Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.339-348
• /
• 2002

The study developed an automatic design method of steel frames which uses nonlinear analysis. The geometric nonlinearity was considered using stability functions. Likewise, the transverse shear deformation effect in a beam-column was explained. A direct search method was used as an automatic design technique. The unit value of each part was evaluated using LRFD interaction equation. The member with the largest unit value was replaced one by one with an adjacent larger member selected from the database. The weight of the steel frame was considered as an objective function. On the other hand, load-carrying capacities, deflections, inter-story drifts, and ductility requirement were used as constraint functions. Case studies of a two-dimensional and a three-dimensional two-story frames were presented.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.249-264
• /
• 2009

Equity-indexed annuities(EIAs) provide their customers with the greater of either the return linked to the underlying index or the minimum guaranteed return. Insurance companies have developed EIAs to attract customers reluctant to buy traditional fixed annuities because of low returns and also reluctant to buy mutual funds for fear of the high volatility in the stock market. This paper proposes a new type of EIA embedded with an outside barrier option with flexible monitoring period in order to increase its participation rate. It also derives an explicit pricing formula for this proposed product, and discusses numerical examples to show relationships among participation rate, barrier level, index volatility and correlation.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.100-100
• /
• 2011

2011년 1월 약 5년에 걸쳐 공방을 이어오던 서울시와 한국수자원공사(수공)와의 물값 분쟁 사례에 대한 대법원의 판결이 내려졌다. 서울시는 댐용수 사용료로 지불한 약 677억에 대한 부당이득금 반환 청구소송을 제기하였고, 이에 대하여 수공은 한강 취수장 물값 114억원을 청구하는 소송을 제기하였다. 결론적으로 대법원은 수공의 손을 들어줌으로서 기나긴 물값 분쟁 사례의 종지부를 찍었다. 본 사례는 대법원이 하천점용허가의 본질을 언급하는 등 향후 물값 관련 분쟁이 발생하는 경우 중요한 선례로 기능하게 될 것이다. 본 연구는 기득수리권 물량의 허용범위에 대하여 2011년 대법원 판결을 중심으로 분석하였다. 기득수리물량의 총합으로 용수료를 계산하고자 한 서울시의 주장에 대하여 각 취수장별 계약량 산정을 주장한 한국수자원공사의 논리에 대하여 대전지방법원 및 대법원의 판결을 중심으로 법적인 분석을 시도하였다. 특히, "민법" 제104조에서 규정하고 있는 '불공정한 법률행위'를 통하여 서울시와 수자원공사 간의 계약상의 하자에 대하여 분석하였다. 수리권과 관련하여 물값 분쟁에 대한 명확한 지침을 제시하는 판례를 찾기는 쉽지 않다. 민법 상의 기득수리권 규정과 하천법 상의 허가수리권 규정이 충돌하면서 명확한 법적인 해석이 곤란한 실정이다. 선서례구속의 의미에서도 본 대법원 판결은 중요한 의미를 가진다고 할 수 있다. 따라서 본 사례에 대한 상세하고 지석적인 분석을 통하여 우리나라 수리권 제도를 재 규명하기 위한 이론적인 토대로 삼는 것이 중요하다고 할 수 있다. 판결문을 중심으로 사례연구를 수행한 본 연구는 다음 두 가지 점에서 의의를 가진다. 첫째는 '공익성'이 높은 물값에 대한 객관적인 판단을 가능하게 하였다는 점, 그리고 둘째는 실질적인 물값 제도개선을 위한 중요한 선행연구로서의 가치를 가진다는 점이다.

• Cartoon and Animation Studies
• /
• s.29
• /
• pp.243-266
• /
• 2012

As contest exhibits have been activated, a variety of organizations are holding contest with various purposes. Analysis on the guidelines prepared by various sponsoring bodies ranging from public organizations to privately owned businesses shows that sponsoring bodies tend to possess copyrights of entries. Parts of guidelines of contest exhibit are the contract. While sponsoring body shows its opinion on copyright through guidelines, individual participant tends to consider it simply as a form to submit for contest exhibit rather than a contract. Now is the time to bring out a question in respect of the copyright on the contest exhibit. The important fact is that copyright on corporate contents is important, but copyright on individual contents is equally important and it must be protected and respected. This study aims to bring out a question on copyright by analyzing possession and infringement of copyright that stands forth in the guidelines of contest exhibit. Provisions on copyright of contest exhibit play a role as a contract. Provisions on copyright of contest exhibit shall be the ones which can be understood and accepted by both sponsoring body and winner who are the A and B of a contract. For this, change in perception of sponsoring bodies ranging from public organizations to privately owned businesses with prominent position is strongly required. For the foregoing, First, Indication of Copyright: Clear and concrete terms must be used. Second, Scope of Interpretation: Concrete and detailed indication must be made for preventing indication that allows comprehensive interpretation. Third, Cost for Author's Property Right: In case sponsoring body needs to possess or use the author's property right of prize-winning work, proper rights on use considering prize money corresponding to possession or use of author's property right must be indicated. Fourth, Term of Use: The term for using author's property right must be indicated. Fifth, Scope of Rights: The scope of author's property right that sponsoring body requires must be limited and indicated. Sixth, Mutual Respect: Items related to copyright must be indicated on the basis of the concept of bilateral contract founded on mutual consideration and respect, not on the concept of unilateral contract.