• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.119-134
• /
• 2019

In order to accomplish a successful management consulting project, the client's receptivity to consulting as well as the management consultant's competency is very important. Even if a consultant with a high level of competence is put into a project, if the consulting receptivity of the company is low, a successful project can not be accomplished. On the other hand, even if consulting receptivity of the company is high, management consulting performance can not be expected if management consultant competency is lacking. This study analyzes the affect of consultant competency on management performance of client firms and the mediating effect of consulting receptivity of client company in terms of management performance. Management consultant competency is measured by task-related competency, managerial competency and common competency, and management performance is measured by financial performance and non-financial performance. The parameters are measured by consulting receptivity and management consulting performance. According to the results of the study, the management consultant's competency has a positive (+) influence on both of consulting receptivity and management consulting performance. Consulting receptivity has a positive (+) influence on both of management consulting performance and non-financial performance. Management consulting performance has a positive (+) influence on both of financial performance and non-financial performance. The mediating effect is that the consulting receptivity mediates directly or indirectly between management consultant competency and financial performance via management consulting performance and non-financial performance. The results of the empirical analysis of this study can contribute to the enhancement of management performance through management consulting in viewpoints of client firms and also contributing to more efficient and effective management consulting.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.61-72
• /
• 2011

Management performance of a construction company can be the sum of management performance of each different project. Therefore, the measurement of management performance following construction projects is essential for securing the competitiveness of a company. However, most research has been related to the performance measurement of the construction industry and companies and little has been conducted on individual project's performance. In particular, building projects have various characteristics depending on construction orderer, type and commissioning entity but no performance indicators have been selected based on this classification. This study aims to select performance indicators for subdivided areas based on project characteristics as well as those which can be commonly used to measure management performance at construction and trial run stages of building projects. In the future, those indicators proposed in this study can be used for developing methodology to evaluate them and later applied to actual building projects to generate quantitative data. In addition, they are expected to be used as reference for selecting indicators to measure management performance of plant and civil engineering projects.

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2002

Though Quality Management(QM) is key determinant for corporate success as shown in Jappanese cases, however, its performance wasn't translated into the context of profitability, which is a good managerial means. Meanwhile the quality cost theory is a different attempt to measure the quality management performance with a financial scale, which doesnot have a reasonable measure. This study suggests a new approach to measure the performance of quality management using ABC(Activity-based Costing), and explains its usefulness with a case study.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.415-440
• /
• 2011

Purposes of this paper are to find out the implementation strategy of TPM activities for SMEs through the analysis which examine the relationship between key activity factors and business performance. TPM activity has been playing a important role to strengthen the competitive power of the enterprises through the optimization of equipment management and maintenance. This study has been conducted using the data collected from 124 SMEs propelling TPM activity. By analyses of the questionnaires, empirical results shows that TPM activities has positive effect on business performance. The contribution of this study is that it provides a conceptual framework and empirical evidence of the causal relationship between key activity factors and business performance. The result of this study can be used for selection of the performance measurement indicators for target achievement in TPM activity. And it will contribute for objectivity of activity performance in case of displaying measurement indicator showing the performance of TPM activity.

• 한국경영정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영정보학회 2007년도 International Conference
• /
• pp.837-842
• /
• 2007

일반기업에서 성과측정이 매우 중요시되는 것과 마찬가지로 공공환경의 복잡한 변화와 함께 공공기관에서도 성과측정이 중요시 되고 있다. 이에 따라 공공기관에서는 무형자산의 중요성을 인식하면서 성과측정과 관리의 수단으로 균형성과지표(Balanced Scorecard)를 도입하고 있다. 그러나 균형성과지표는 일반기업의 성과측정을 위해 고안된 방법론으로 공공기관의 특성을 반영할 수 있도록 변형되지 않고서는 공공기관에 그대로 도입되어 사용될 수는 없다. 더욱이 기존의 BSC는 '시간지연(time delay)'을 가지고 있는 지표들간의 상호작용 및 상호 의존성을 반영하지 못하고 있으며, 지표들간의 피드백을 유발하는 인과관계를 간과하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 핵심지표들간의 상호작용 및 관계성의 설정과 새로운 정책이나 입법과정에서 발생할 수 있는 '시간지연'에 의한 영향 등을 반영하고자 시스템다이내믹스(System Dynamics)와 시스템사고를 적용, 공공기관, 성과측정에 적합한 Dynamic BSC 모델을 개발하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 2002년도 춘계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.809-816
• /
• 2002

전통적 재무제표가 기업의 재무적인 성과 측정에만 초점을 맞춘다는 한계를 극복하기 위한 방법으로서 BSC(Balanced Scorecard)가 제시되었다. BSC는 KPI(Key Performance Indicator)들의 상관관계가 명확하고 논리적이라는 장점 때문에 정부 및 기업의 다양한 분야에서 적용되어왔다. 이러한 BSC는 KPI를 통해 측정된 값의 비교에 대한 고려를 하고 있지 않으므로 다수 조직의 성과를 비교하기에 어려움이 있다. 조직의 효율성을 rPfidd적으로 나타내는 여러 기법 중, 경영과학 기법을 이용한 DEA의 경우 다수의 측정 지표를 단일의 통합된 성과 측정 지표 (Aggregate Performance Measure)_로 나타낼 수 있다는 장점이 있으나, DEA에 고려되는 입력 및 출력의 개수에 제한이 있으며 다수 조직의 분석에 사용해야 한다는 단점이 있다. 본 연구에서는, 재무적인 요소와 비재무적인 요소를 포괄하여 조직간의 효율성을 비교하기 위한 벙법으로서, DEA를 이용한 효율성 평가에 조직의 성과측정 기법인 BSC가 제공하는 KPI 간의 노릴적 인과관계(cause-and-effect relationship)와 측정 지표를 이용하는 방법으로 CDB(Combined DEA and BSC methodology)를 제안한다. 이를 위하여 BSC 정보 비교 가능한 형태로 바꾸는 방법을 제시하며, 기존 DEA가 지니는 입력 및 출력 변수 개수의 증가에 따른 효율성의 구분능력의 감소와 관련된 한계를 극복할 수 있는 방법을 제시한다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.254-264
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to develop a performance measurement factor of Balanced Scorecard(BSC) for health-care organization. We did also the research to evaluate the validity and reliability of these indicators. Fifty six health-care organizations are participated in a survey questionnaires. This questionnaires consists of 53-questions, which are the performance evaluation indicators designed by researcher, which are based on the Norton and Kaplan's BSC-Framework. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to analyze the weight and significances of each factor. Factor analysis of the BSC resulted in 11 major measurement factors (Eigenvalue >1.0). The AHP analysis showed the list of the hospital BSC measurement factors and its KPI(Key Performance Indicator) weighted by its significance priorities. The recommendable degree of reliability and validity of these BSC factors suggests that these factors are adequate for performance measurements of the health-care organizations in Korea.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 2001

Knowledge management was introduced as a new strategy in many construction companies aiming at paradigm shift since Asian financial Crisis. However, intensive focusing on acquiring and sharing knowledge couldn't keep pace with the primary goal. Increasing financial profits. That is because clear strategic process and performance measurement are absent in time of the introduction of knowledge management. Based on case analysis in domestic construction industry, this research work presents an alternative plan on Balanced Scorecard(BSC) model. The objective of this study is to develop a model of strategic performance measurement in knowledge management by sorting and grasping core operational knowledge, which can draw key performance indicators accompanied by knowledge map from case study.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 2002년도 춘계공동학술대회
• /
• pp.489-491
• /
• 2002

BSC(Balanced Scorecard)는 재무지표 뿐 아니라 비재무지표의 활용도를 높여 기업의 성과를 측정하며, 재무, 고객, 내부 프로세스 그리고 학습과 성장의 시각에서 성과측정지표를 결정하고 이를 균형있게 관리하려는 접근법이다. BSC가 비재무지표의 활용도를 높인 것은 큰 성과로 여겨지지만 지표를 선정하고 이를 향상시키기 위한 요소를 찾는 것은 여전히 해결해야 할 과제로 남는다. 이 논문은 TOC 관점에서 BSC를 이해하고 BSC가 보다 성공적인 전략실행 도구가 될 수 있는 논의를 제안한다. TOC와 BSC가 서로 협력하여 성과를 거두기 위해서는 BSC가 성과지표를 원가회계보다는 쓰루풋회계를 활용하여 측정하고, 성과지표 선정에서도 제약과 비제약을 구분하는 기준이 도입되어야 할 것이다.

• Korean Business Review
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.77-101
• /
• 2009

The main purpose of this study is to assess the effect of using Balanced Scorecard, and relationship among learning and growth performance, internal business performance, customer performance, financial performance, and business performance. To achieve this study, theoretical and empirical studies related to Balanced Scorecard were carried out simultaneously. A field survey was undertaken through questionnaire sampling a population of construction firms. The established hypotheses related to Balanced Scorecard and organizational performance were verified by the paired-t test analysis using SPSS. The result of this research are as follows : First, BSC firm's learning and growth performance are higher than those of before BSC adopting firms significantly. Second, BSC firm's internal business performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. Third, BSC firm's customer performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. Fourth, BSC firm's financial performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. Fifth, BSC firm's Business performance level is higher than that of before BSC firm's significantly. This study contributes to the BSC research by being the study focus on the BSC at the general indicators and provides evidence that may help understanding the possible relationship between BSC adoption and improvement of organizational performance. There are some limitations, however, of this study. The result are based on a cross sectional sample of construction firms, which may not be reflective of the entire population.