• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.91-101
• /
• 2011

A lecture evaluation is an important factor to validate student's level and improve a reformation of the college evaluation as well. Therefore, this paper researches into the lecture evaluation to apply a better objective method and a fair assessment of all lectures. These researches are analyzed by each subject, based on the lecture assessment performed in K College. First, if a student absent more than 4 weeks, they cannot be participated in the lecture evaluation. Second, the lecture evaluation date takes place when the next class registrations start. Third, the connection between the number of students and the teaching assessment should be considered. Finally, various types of the teaching assessment tools, including the lecture evaluation method such as multiple choices or writing questions need to be applied. Finally lecture evaluation results must be reflected in the next lesson.

• Journal of vocational education research
• /
• v.30 no.4
• /
• pp.23-49
• /
• 2011

Faculty performance evaluation system has been settled down as an uncomfortable but unavoidable system, and it is one of the most important factors to grow the college competitiveness up. In this study, we selected and surveyed faculty evaluation models of several universities and colleges in Korea, and analyzed by comparing each evaluation areas of educational achievement, college-industry collaboration, research, and service. We also identified the properties of the current faculty evaluation models of the junior colleges, and derived several problems from these models such as an imitation of four-year university model, a disorders of job evaluation with respect to the attributes of classified jobs, a large variation of individual item weights, and an insufficient reflection of major characteristics. Based on these surveys and analysis, an improved faculty evaluation model for the junior college is proposed in this study. This model proposed four basic areas-educational achievement, college-industry collaboration, research, and service by considering the importance of the college-industry collaboration in the junior college-as well as the team evaluation area. Weights of the SCI-class paper was selected as a criterion for the arrangement of objective comparison of each evaluation items. We showed the integration method of several different evaluation model with respect to the attributes of classified jobs of each faculties, and evaluation plan of variational characteristics according to the majors of individuals in this model. Finally, we introduced an area fail and rating system to operate efficiently the proposed faculty evaluation model.