• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.1 no.2
• /
• pp.93-100
• /
• 1989

철근콘크리트부재의 강도는 여러 가지 요인으로 인하여 변이를 보이고 있다. 주요 요인들은 콘크리트나 철근의 강도 및 역학적 특성의 변이, 시공오차등이다. 이들중 콘크리트의 강도는 상대적으로 높은 불확실성을 가지며, 다양한 요인(배합, 운반, 타설, 양생등)에 의해 변화정도가 영향을 받는다. 본 연구에서는 국내 철근콘크리트 구조물이 가지는 신뢰도의 수준을 분석하기 위한 기초자료 조사로서, 현장에서 타설되는 콘크리트를 설계강도별로 직접채취하여 습윤양생과 현장조건양생을 통하여 콘크리트의 28일 압축강도의 확률적 특성을 분석하였다. 분석된 결과를 이용하여 현장타설 부재내에서의 콘크리트의 압축강도를 추정하였다.

• Computational Structural Engineering
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.30-38
• /
• 1997

본 논문에서는 선형파괴역학의 관점에서의 파괴강도해석 기법들에 대해서 포괄적으로 논의하였다. 파괴강도해석을 위하여 규정되어야 할 파라메타들의 결정방법들에 대하여 설명하고 이들 파라메타들을 파괴강도설계에 적용시키는 과정들을 압력용기를 예를 들어 체계적으로 설명하였다. 선형파괴강도해석을 근간으로 한 파괴강도설계 방법으로 구조물을 설계하면 파괴응력에 대한 안전계수를 정확하게 산정할 수 있어서 안전성이 제고된 구조물을 설계.제작할 수 있게 될 것이다.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.87-94
• /
• 2003

Construction plan and strength control have limitations in construction production field because it is difficult to predict the form removal strength and development of specified concrete strength. However, we can have reasonable construction plan and strength control if prediction of concrete strength is available. In this study, firstly, the newly proposed strength prediction model with maturity method was compared with the logistic model to test the adaptability. Secondly, the determination of time of form removal was verified through the new strength prediction model. As the results, it is found that investigation of the activation energy that are used to calculate equivalent age is necessary, and new strength prediction model was proved to be more accurate in the strength prediction than logistic model in the early age. Moreover, the use of new model was more reasonable because it has low SSE and high decisive factor. If we adopt new strength prediction model at construction field, we can expect the reduced period of work through the reduced time of form removal.

• Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute Conference
• /
• 1992.10a
• /
• pp.11-18
• /
• 1992

프리텐션방식 원심력 고강도콘크리트 말뚝(KS F4306) 콘크리트의 압축강도가 800kg/$\textrm{cm}^2$이상인 고강도콘크리트를 요구하고 있으나 국내에서는 500kg/$\textrm{cm}^2$ 이상의 콘크리트 말뚝제조가 불가한 실정이므로 본 연구에서는 고황산염시멘트를 이용한 고강도콘크리트 말뚝제조에 관한 공학적 특성 연구의 일환으로써 고황산염시멘트의 수화특성 및 고강도 발현기구 구명과 공학적 특성중에서 압축.휨강도의 내동해성, 건조수축 특성 및 화학저항성등을 비교 고찰하여 보통 시멘트보다 품질 특성이 우수함을 확인하였다. 또한 고강도 콘크리트 말뚝의 시제품 제조를 위하여 2개 공장에서 현장 실험한 결과 94.7kg/$\textrm{cm}^2$의 양호한고강도콘크리트를 얻었다. 향후 고강도콘크리트 말뚝 제조의 공업화 및 양산회가 기대된다.

• Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.75-86
• /
• 1989

본 본문에서는 실리카 흄을 사용한 고강도 콘크리트의 제조와 역학적 특성 및 최적 배합에 대한 실험적 연구를 수행하였다. 본 본문에서는 주요 실험변수를 물-시멘트비와 혼화재인 실리카 흄의 혼입량으로 정하였으며, 압축강도 및 휨강도와 합렬인장강도 특성을 분석하였다. 실리카흄의 혼입으로 강도가 증가함을 발견하였으나 어느 범위이상의 과도한 혼입은 오히려 강도를 저해하는 것으로 나타났다. 물-시멘트비 0.28에서는 실리카 흄 혼입량이 5%일 때 최대의 강도가 나타났고, 물-시멘트비 0.40에서는 15%, 물-시멘트비 0.55에서는 20%혼입에서 가장 큰 강도가 나타났다. 또한 본 연구에서는 압축강도와 물-시멘트비 및 실리카 흄량 사이의 관계를 도출하여 그 관게식을 제시하였으며, 이 식으로부터 소요강도를 위한 본 배합변수를 유추할 수 있다. 본 연구결과 물-시멘트비 효과와 실리카 흄의 효과가 상쇄되는 구간이 존재하며, 따라서 이들 효과를 함께 고려한 최적배합을 도출하여 제시하고 있다.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.481-488
• /
• 2010

Since existing constitutive models developed for confined normal strength concrete overestimate ductility when they are applied to confined high strength concrete, these models cannot be directly applied to confined high strength concrete. In an effort to solve this problem, an accurate stress-strain relationship of the hihg strength concrete needs to be formulated by examining the confinement effects due to increase of the concrete strength. In this study, a constitutive model is developed to express the stress-strain relationship of confined high strength concrete by carrying out regression analysis of the main parameters affection strength and ductile behavior of reinforced high strength concrete columns. Twenty-five test specimens were chosen from the reported experimental studies in the literature. The experimental results of stress-strain relationships of show a good agreement with results of the stress-strain relationships of suggested high strength concrete, covering a strength range between 60 and 124 MPa.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.275-282
• /
• 2009

The effects of surface treatment method of reinforcing fiber on the bonding strength between carbon fiber reinforced polymer rebar (CFRP rebar) and high strength concrete have been evaluated in this study. The structural PVA fiber is coated with a proprietary hydrophobicoiling agent and crimped type polyolefin based structural synthetic fiber is deformed with a geometrical modification were used for the reinforcing fiber. The compressive tests have been performed to evaluate the strength property of high strength concrete depending on the surface treatment method of fiber. The bonding property between the high strength concrete and the CFRP rebar was evaluated by means of direct bonding test. The test results indicated that the surface treatment method of fiber effect on the bonding behavior of high strength concrete and CFRP rebar. Also, as the development and propagation of splitting cracks were controled by adding fibers into the high strength concrete, the bonding behavior, bond strength and relative bonding strength of CFRP rebar and high strength concrete were significantly improved.

• Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.685-693
• /
• 2012

The yield strength of shear reinforcement is restricted in the present design codes. In this study, the possibility of the yield strength increase in shear reinforcement is evaluated according to ACI318-08, EC2-02 and CSA-04 by comparing the experimental and calculated results. Three cases were used to analyze the shear strength of the beam. One had no limitation in the yield strength of shear reinforcement, another had restriction on the yield strength of shear reinforcement, and the other had a restriction on the yield strength of shear reinforcement and the shear reinforcement ratio. The study results showed that the case with unlimited shear reinforcement yield strength predicted the test result better than other two cases. Even though the rebar yield strength higher than the strength required in present code was applied to existing shear design equation, the result was reasonable. Therefore, the design equation seemed to be appropriate even if the high-strength shear reinforcement is used in practice based on the existing shear design method.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.901-907
• /
• 2013

In this study, flexural strength properties of concrete under biaxial stress state were experimentally investigated. Tests for size effect and fatigue behaviour of concrete under biaxial stress were carried out by the ASTM C 1550 and the biaxial flexure test(BFT). The results given by the biaxial tests were compared to those by the third-point bending test. Test results showed that biaxial flexural strengths obtained from the ASTM C 1550 and the biaxial flexure test are greater than the strength by the third-point bending test. As the size increases, the uniaxial and biaxial flexural strength decreases. However, the slope of the size effect of the biaxial strength was greater than that of the uniaxial strength. Finally, the fatigue response of concrete under the biaxial stress state was similar with that for uniaxial stress state.

• Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction
• /
• v.10 no.2 s.35
• /
• pp.153-160
• /
• 1998

The sectional dimensions and initial crookedness of the RHS(rectangular hollow section, ${\boxe}-75{\times}75{\times}3.2,\;{\boxe}-100{\times}100{\times}4.2,\;{\boxe}-125{\times}125{\times}6.0$) were measured. The axial compressive strength tests for columns with slenderness $46{\sim}84$ were performed as well as stub tests and tensile tests. FEM analysis was also used. The measurement shows that the errors of sectional dimensions are negligible. For the column length corresponding to ${\lambda}=100$, the initial crookedness with the 2.5% probability estimated from the measured results is 1/490, 1/1121 1/1395 for each section respectively. The yield strengths obtained from tensile test are higher than the specified minimum value by more than 30%. The column test shows that the maximum axial resistances are almost same as, or a little higher than the FEM results and the specified strength curves of AISC Specification and Eurocode, when the maximum strengths from the stub tests are used as the yield strength of the steel. But the test results show much higher column strength than those specified in the Standard and Code, when the specified minimum yield strength of the steel is used.