• 의학교육논단
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.76-82
• /
• 2017

The quantitative expansion of nursing schools has necessitated the qualitative improvement of nursing education, which requires the development of nursing education for clinical practice. To identify strategies for strengthening the educational capacity of clinical fields and nursing schools, this study first examined the current status of nursing education for clinical practice, and then proposed several prospective directions for education. Nursing clinical practice-related studies from several Korean and international electronic databases were reviewed. Insufficient training hospitals and lack of qualified clinical training instructors were the main problems found within nursing educational resources for clinical practice, while the simple practice contents based on observation and inadequate evaluations were the main problems found in nursing educational management for clinical practice. This study suggests better standards and educational accountability for training hospitals and programs to nurture human resources for clinical practice, as well as a variety of training methods to integrate practical training courses and the expansion of formation evaluation. Based on these results, it is necessary to establish governance for nursing education for clinical practice and clarify the role and standards of each practitioner, strengthen the educational role of the hospital, and improve the system. In addition, introducing various types of education methods and strengthening evaluation standards are needed in order to enhance nursing education for clinical practice.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2015

Purpose: This study examined the effects of peer assisted learning (PAL) using video recordings in standardized patients (SP) simulation. Methods: A mixed-method approach was adopted, in which quantitative data were supplemented with qualitative data. Research participants consisted of 49 nursing students, 24 of whom were assigned to the experimental group, and 25 to the control group. The 12 item instrument was used to measure perioperative care knowledge, while performance confidence was assessed with the 10 item questionnaire, and clinical critical thinking skills with the Clinical Critical Thinking Skill Test (CCTS). Qualitative data were collected using a reflective journaling and in-depth interviews. Results: Participants in the experimental group exhibited significantly higher levels of knowledge than those in the control group (t=5.43, p<.001), and were significantly more confident in their performances (F=52.33, p<.001). However, no significant differences were found between the experimental and the control groups with regard to CCTS (t=0.72, p=.477). A qualitative content analysis was conducted using the interview and reflective journaling data, in which six major themes were elicited from three codes. Conclusion: PAL employing video recordings is expected to be utilized as a teaching and learning strategy in simulation-based nursing practicum with greater frequency and longer period, given the positive effects observed in this study.

• 한국의료윤리학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.360-376
• /
• 2018

간호대학생은 임상실습을 통해 도덕적 고뇌와 도덕적 민감성을 경험하게 되는 윤리적 갈등상황에 직면한다. 대부분의 간호대학생은 윤리적 갈등상황에서 본인의 의견을 말하기가 어렵다. 따라서 간호대학생의 도덕적 용기를 증진시키는 것은 간호전문직의 책임을 다하고 임상 실무에서 간호의 질을 향상시키는 데 중요하다. 간호대학생을 대상으로 도덕적 고뇌, 도덕적 민감성, 도덕적 용기에 대한 연구는 국내에서 처음 시도되었다. 본 연구는 간호대학생의 도덕적 고뇌, 도덕적 민감성 및 도덕적 용기의 수준을 파악하고 도덕적 고뇌와 도덕적 민감성이 도덕적 용기에 미치는 영향을 확인하기 위한 서술적 조사연구이다. 연구대상은 서울, 경기의 2개 간호대학에 재학 중인 4학년 간호대학생 138명으로, 자가보고식 설문지를 사용하였고, 결과 분석은 IBM SPSS Statistics 23 프로그램의 상관분석과 다중회귀분석을 사용하였다. 본 연구결과 도덕적 고뇌 온도계, 도덕적 고뇌, 도덕적 민감성, 도덕적 용기의 각각의 총점 평균은 $3.53{\pm}2.18$, $57.33{\pm}43.35$, $134.98{\pm}13.98$, $56.33{\pm}12.75$으로 나타났다. 도덕적 용기에 영향을 미치는 요인은 도덕적 고뇌 온도계와 도덕적 민감성의 하부요인인 환자중심간호였다. 최종회귀모형은 통계적으로 유의하였으나(F=4.27, p=.016) 모형의 설명력은 5%였다. 본 연구의 결과를 통해 간호사처럼 간호대학생도 도덕적 고뇌를 경험함을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서 도덕적 고뇌를 해결하고 도덕적 민감성을 높이고 도덕적 용기로 이어지게 하기 위해서는 다양한 사례를 바탕으로 하는 교육을 통해 윤리적 가치를 함께 공유하고, 간호대학생의 도덕적 용기를 지지 및 소통하는 조직 환경을 조성하려는 노력이 필요하다.

• 호스피스학술지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.5-14
• /
• 2007

인간은 신체적, 사회.심리적, 영적으로 통합적인 존재로써 각 차원의 건강은 분리되어 있는 것이 아니라 유기적으로 상호관련성을 가지고 있다. 영적 안녕은 신체적, 정신적, 사회.심리적 건강에 영향을 미치는 것으로 밝혀지고 있으며, 이는 인간의 영적 본성을 최대한으로 개발시키는 능력이며 총체적으로 인간에게 영향을 미치는 삶의 원리와 동등한 것이라 할 수 있다. 영적안녕은 삶의 의미와 목적에 초점을 둔 실존적인 영적 안녕 상태와 하나님과의 관계 안에서 안녕감을 갖는 종교적인 영적 안녕을 포함한다. 간호과학은 인간의 건강을 돕는 돌봄이 학문이며, 전인적 존재인 인간을 신체적, 사회?심리적, 그리고 영적, 즉 전인적으로 간호하는 것을 목표로 하고 있다. 따라서 전인간호를 제공하기 위해서는 우선 간호사 자신이 영적으로 안녕해야 함은 물론, 자신이 간호대상자에게 치료의 도구가 되어야 하고, 이를 통해 영적 간호를 수행할 수 있어야 한다. 간호대학생은 비록 학생이기는 하지만 재학 중 이미 다양한 간호실무 현장으로 나아가 임상실습을 통해 대상자들을 직접 만나게 되므로 간호사들과 마찬가지로 전인적으로 건강해야 하며, 이를 통해 간호대상자들의 건강도 전인적으로 돌볼 수 있게 된다. 이에 본 연구는 간호학생들의 영적 안녕 정도를 파악해보고 이와 관련있는 제 특성들을 규명함으로써 간호학생들을 위한 영성 교육 프로그램 개발과 학교생활지도의 기초자료를 제공하기 위해 시도된 서술적 조사 연구이다. 본 연구의 대상자는 B 광역시에 소재한 1개 기독교 종합대학교 간호대학에 재학중인 학생 240명을 대상으로 하였다. 이중 213명이 응답하였으며 본 연구목적에 부적절한 응답을 제외한 188명을 최종 분석 대상으로 하였다(최종 분석율 : 88.3%). 본 연구에 사용된 도구는 자기 기입형인 구조화된 설문지로서, 20개 문항으로 구성된 영적 안녕 측정도구와 제 특성 20개 문항 등 총 40개 문항으로 구성되어 있다. 영적 안녕 측정도구는 Paloutzian와 Ellison(1983)이 개발하고, 최상순(1990)이 번역하였으며, 강정호(1996)가 수정 보완한 도구를 사용하였고, '거의 그렇지 않다' 1점, '대체로 그렇지 않다' 2점, '대체로 그렇다' 3점, '매우 그렇다' 4점으로 구성된 Likert형 4점 척도이며, 부정적인 문항은 역산하였고, 점수가 높을수록 영적으로 안녕감이 높은 것을 의미한다. 본 연구에서 도구의 신뢰도는 Cronbach's ?값이 .94로 나타났다. 대상자의 제 특성은 인구사회학적 특성, 종교관련 특성, 학교관련 특성 등을 조사하였다. 본 연구의 자료수집 기간은 2006년 3월 3일부터 동년 3월 17일까지였으며, 자료수집 방법은 본 연구자가 각 학년 강의실에 들어가 연구목적을 설명하고 동의를 한 대상자에 한에서 설문지를 배부하여 응답하게 한 후 각 학년 대표를 통해 회수하였다. 본 자료의 분석은 SPSS/PC+ 12.0프로그램을 이용하여 실수와 백분율, 평균, 표준편차, 최소값, 최대값, t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe's test로 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 대상자의 영적 안녕 정도는 평균 $63.95\pm10.256$ (도구범위 : 20-80점), 최소 38점, 최대 80점, 평균평점 $3.20\pm.513$으로 높은 편으로 나타났다. 이를 하위영역으로 분석해 보았을 때 실존적 안녕 정도는 평균 $32.98\pm4.470$, 최소 22점, 최대 40점, 평균평점 $3.30\pm.450$으로 높은 편이었고, 종교적 안녕 정도는 평균 $30.96\pm7.000$, 최소 10점, 최대 40점, 평균평점 $3.10\pm.700$으로 약간 높은 편이었다. 2. 대상자의 제 특성에 따른 영적 안녕 정도는 학년(F=6.101, p= .001), 종교(F= 17.703, p= .000), 기독교인의 경우 신급(F=8.194, p= .000), 교회출석기간(F=7.947, p= .000), 교회 예배의 정기출석(F=4.242, p= .000), 정기적 성경읽기(공부)와 기도생활(F=5.863, p= .001=0), 본인이 지각한 예수님과의 인격적 만남(F=4.160, p= .000), 부모종교(F=9.320, p= .000), 본인이 지각한 부모양육태도(F=4.146, p= .000), 현재 타 학과 편입, 전과 희망여부(F=-2.050, p= .050) 등에 따라 영적 안녕 정도가 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 이상의 결과를 요약하면 간호대학생들은 비교적 높은 영적 안녕감을 보였으며, 제 특성 중 학년, 종교, 기독교인의 경우 신급, 교회 출석기간, 교회 예배의 정기출석여부, 정기적 성경읽기(공부)와 기도생활 여부, 본인이 지각한 예수님과의 인격적 만남 여부, 부모 종교, 본인이 지각한 부모의 양육태도, 현재 타 학과 편입이나 전과 희망여부 등에 따라 영적 안녕 정도가 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 따라서 본 연구 결과를 간호대학생들을 위한 영성 교육 프로그램 개발과 학교생활지도의 기초 자료로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

• 한국간호교육학회지
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.249-263
• /
• 1998

The competence of newly graduated nurses is based on various clinical expriences gained when they were students. Therefore, instructors of nursing students, professors in nursing schools or directors in hospitals must play a critical role in assisting them to obtain various knowledge and experienced nursing skills. The purpose of this study was to investigate nursing care activities and nursing care hours practiced by nursing students in a general hospital. The subject students were total 214 nursing students, 2nd graders(sophomores) and 3rd graders(juniors) from 5 Junior Nursing Colleges in Seoul and they practiced at S general hospital to gain clinical experience. The data were collected for 4 days. The tools for this study were the direct nursing care activity list consisted of 15 nursing areas and the indirect nursing care activity list consisted of 9 nursing areas. The subject students were supposed to record their own score. The results of this study are ; 1. The nursing care hours per nursing student 1) The average total nursing care hours a day per each nursing student are 362.65 mins(6.04hr), the direct nursing care hours per each nursing stuent are 202.09 mins(direct nursing care rate 56.0%) and it is higher than the indirect nursing care hours, 159.75mins(indirect nursing care rate 44.0%). The direct nursing care rate of each student by a team approach in the evening shift(56.3%) is higher than that in the day shift(55.8%). 2) The hours of checking vital signs are the longest(47.35mins) among the direct nursing care activites and next is in order of counseling 8l emotional support, nurse rounds, and accompaning a patient during examination. The hours of reporting are the longest(32.39mins) among the indirect nursing care activites, and next is the activities related to education such as reviewing chart, looking up references, etc. 3) The freqency of checking vital signs practiced by nursing student is the highest(the average of 55.7 times) among the direct nursing care activities and next is in order of nurse rounds, assistance of feeding, and counseling & emotional support. The required time for nursing students to accompany their patient during examination is the longest(20.7mins) and next are in order of restriction on patient' activity, orientated by a head nurse, skin care, sitz bath, bathing & hair shampoo, and assisting with patients' exercise. 2. The nursing care hours per grader 1) The average hours of total nursing care per a nursing student are 369.2mins(6.2hrs) to 2nd graders, 355.9mins(5.9 hrs) to third graders. The direct nursing care rate per each nursing student to 3rd graders(59.3%) was higher than that to End graders(52.8%). 2) For 2nd graders, the highly marked nursing activities are teaching associated with direct nursing care activities such as drawing up papers, looking up references, reviewing charts, and being orientated by staff nurses. For 3rd graders, measurments, observations, and nurse rounds in indirect nursing care activities are taken highly 3) The most frequent practice of the nursing care activites is checking vital signs : 65 times to 3rd graders and 46.5 times to 2nd graders. Our suggestions based on the results of this study are : 1. It is recommanded to repeat the same designed study in a variety of clinical fields for further study. 2. It is recommanded to collect data not by self-record method but by observated method. 3. It is needed for nursing instructors in Nursing Schools and in hospitals to develop the guidelines and check-list of clinical practice courses.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.581-596
• /
• 1995

Clinical practice in nursing education provides an opportunity for students, through the process of ap-plying theoretical knowledge to practice, and to learn nursing skills as well as being socialized into nursing and as such decrease the reality shock of actual nursing practice. Because of a shortage of nursing faculty, the job of achieving the objectives of the clinical practice had been turned over to the head nurses. This resulted in many problems, such as, unclear location of responsibilities and inadequate feedback from head nurses. Therefore this study was done to introduce and evaluate the use of preceptors as a way to minimize the above problems, and to maximize the achievement of the clinical practice objectives. Using an adaptation of Zerbe's (1991) three-tiered team model, clinical practice was done using a preceptor, a head nurse and a clinical instructor, each with different and well defined roles. The subjects of this study were 67 senior students of the College of Nursing of Y University in Seoul whose clinical practice in adult nursing was carried out between May 1, 1994 and December 8, 1994. There were 22 preceptors who had at least two years of clinical experience and who were recommended by their head nurses. They were given additional education on the philosophy and objectives of the College of Nursing, on communication skills, on the theory and practice of education, and on nursing diagnosis and education evaluation. The role of the preceptor was to work one-to-one with students in their practice. The role of the head nurse was to supervise and evaluate the preceptors. The role of the clinical instructor was to provide the education program for the preceptors, to provide ad-vice and suggestions to the preceptors and to maintain lines of communication with the college. With each of these roles in place, it was thought that the effectiveness and efficiency of the clinical practice could be increased significantly. To evaluate the effectiveness of the preceptorship, the three - tiered model, Lowery's Teacher Evaluation Opinion Form translated and adapted to Korea was used to measure student statisfaction. The Clinical Practice Compentency Evaluation Tool developed by Lee et ai was also used to measure student competencies. The results of this study are as follows 1. The satisfaction with clinical practice was higher with the introduction of the perceptors than it was before they were used. (t=-5.96, p=<.005) 2. The clinical practice competencies were higher with the introduction of the preceptors than it was before they were used(t=-5.l3, p<.005) 3. In order to analyze areas not measured by the quantitative tools additional analysis of the open questions was done. The results of this analysis showed that : 1) The students felt positive about their sense of security, confidence, handling of responsbility, and being systematic. They also felt positive about improvements in knowledge, opportunities for direct care, and socialization. 2) The students felt negative about the technical part of their role, lack of knowledge by the preceptor, unprofessional attitudes on the part of the preceptor, difficulty in the role of the professional nurse(student). 3) The preceptors felt positive about their responsibility, motivation, and relationship with the college. 4) The preceptors felt negative about their bur-den. Introduction of the preceptorship model will lead to change and improvement in the negative factors discussed above, solve problems in the present clinical education system, increase continuity in the education of the students, help with socialization of the students and motivation of the preceptors to up-grade their education and increase their confidence. These objectives must be obtained to further the development of professional nursing, and thus, making the preceptorship a reality is our job for the future.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.946-962
• /
• 1996

The purpose of this study was to contribute to the development of clinical instruction by students' ratings of teaching effectiveness in clinical nursing education. The subjects were comprised of graduating class 618 students from 24 nursing colleges in the nation. The instruments used in this study were "general characteristics & status of clinical nursing education" developed by the researcher and "Instrument to Measure Effectiveness of Clinical Instructors" by Reeve(1994). The 50 questions used in the questionaire were categorized into 13 components subject to factor analysis. The 13 components were interpersonal relationships, communication skills, role model, resource for students, favorable to students, encouraging to think for selves, teaching methods, evaluation, finding assignments for objectives, organization of subject matter, professional competence, knowledge of subject matter & working with agency personnel. The results of this study are as follows 1. Status of clinical nursing educaion : 1) Clinical nursing education were led by nursing professors(44.9%), a team of both nuring professor & head nurse(6.8%), instructors from specific hospital(15.1%), instuctos for a specific subject(14.6%), & head nurse(6.8%). For 3-year program students, 34.6% of the clinical nursing education were led by instructors from specific hospital & 51.4% of the education by nursing professors for Bachelor's program. 2) The contents for clinical education comprised of Conference being the most frequent of 34.5% ; a combination of Nursing skills, Orientation, Conference etc.22.0% : Nursing process 21.7% : Orientation 13.5% : Inspection(making rounds ) 6.4%, & Nursing skills of 2% being the least frequent. 3) Students' preference of clinical teachers from the highest to the lowest were instructors for a specific subject being the most desired (44.9%) followed by nursing professor, head nurse, a team of both nursing professor & head nurse, & instructors from specific hospital being the least desired. 4) Students felt that the qualification for clinical teachers should be at least a master's degree holder and 5 or more years of clinical experience. The reason they felt was because knowledge & experience are imperative for professional education. 2. Clinical teaching effectiveness : The total points for teaching effectiveness was 147.97(mean of 2.95±0.98) where the total score is considered to be an average rating. 3. Teaching effectiveness as status of clinical nursing education : 1) The score ratings for the clinical instructors from the highest to the lowest were as follows : instructors for a specific subject, instructors from specific hospitals, a team of both nursing professors & head nurses, nursing professors, head nurses, which resulted in significunt difference(F=4.53, P<0.001). 2) The rating scores based on the teaching program from the highest to the lowest were as follws ; nursing skills, nursing process, a combination of nursing skills, orientation, conference etc. , conferences, orientation, inspection, which resulted in significunt difference(F=10.97, P<0.001). 4. Based on 13 categorized components from the questionaires, questions related to communication skills scored the highest points of 3.20 where inquiries regarding resource for students scored the lowest points of 2.38. 5. Among the 13 categorial components from the questionaire, Interpersonal relationship, Communication skills, Resource for students, Encouraging to think for selves, Evaluation, Teaching method, Finding assignment for objectives, Organization of subject matter, Professional competence, & Working with agency personnel, instructors for a specific subject scored the highest points and head nurse scored the lowest, which resulted in significant difference. Favorable for students, instructors for a specific subject scored highest points and nursing professor scored the lowest, which resulted in significant deference (F=5.39, P<0.001). Role model & Professional competence, instructors for a specific subject scored the highest points and head nurse scored the lowest, with minimum variation(F=1.29, P>0.05 : F=1.64, P>0.05) 6. Based on 13 categorial components as a whole, the highest points scored among the 5 groups of clinical teachers was instructors for a specific subject and the lowest, by head nurse(F=1.94, P<0. 001). A team of both nursing professor & head nurse attained higher score in clinical education than their independent education.