• 지역사회간호학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.465-502
• /
• 1989

The purpose of this study was to find out the general characteristics of school health teachers, the status of school health resources and the degrees of self-confident performance for the 124 school health teachers in Pusan City. Data was collected by means of questionaires from Aug. 1986 to Mar. 1987. The data were analyzed by use of percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA and Pearson-correlation coefficient. The results of this study were as follows: 1 . General Characteristics of School Health Teachers (SHT) 1) The average of age of the SHT was 32.8 years old and 39.5% of them were from 30 to 34 years old. 2) The average for school nursing experience of the SHT was 7.9 years and 37.9% of them were from 5 to 9 years. 3) The 45.2% of them have not the clinical experience. 4) The 74.2% of them were graduated from the 3 years college of nursing. 2. Status of school health resources and nursing activities. 1) The average of student number was 2497.3 and class number was 45.2. 2) The average of school health budget was 1039000 won and 27.7% of school health budget expended on examination cost. 3) Only 29.0% of all schools have organization for school health. 4) The 84.7% of all schools have health clinic separately and 69.1% of schools have less than $33m^2$ sized. 5) The average of clinic visitor number was 2111.8 for 1 year. 6) Major problem was on digestive system. And other problems were skin, respiratory, musculo-skeletal system and dental problem. 7) The number of literal message was 14.4 times for 1 year. 3. The degree of the school health teachers' self-confidence. The school health teachers' self-confidence was deviced into 6 and the maximum degree was 4. 1) Program planning & evaluation; 2.8 2) Clinic management; 2.9 3) Health education, 3.0 4) Management of school environment; 2.7 5) Health care services; 2.7 6) Operating of school health organization; 2.4 4. Significances to the degree of self-confidence on school health nursing activities. 1) There was significant difference between clinical management and Religion (t=2.15 p<.05) 2) There was significant difference between Operating of school health organization and level of school (F=3.588 p<.05) 3) Program planning & evaluation: expending time for clinical management (r=-0.184 p<.05) expending time for health care services (r=0.273 p<.01) 4) Clinical management: use of separate health clinic (r=0.151 p<.05) 5) Health education: use of separate health clinic (r=0.170 p<0.5) 6) Health care services: No. of student (r=-0.144 p<0.5) No. of class (r=-0.160 p<.05) 5. The degree of the school health teachers' self-discipline. The school health teachers' self-discipline was devided into 2 and the maximum degree was 2. 1) Program planning & evaluation:1.8 2) Clinic management: 1.9 3) Health education: 1.9 4) Management of school environment: 1.7 5) Health care services: 1.8 6) Operating of school health organization.: 1.3 6. Significances to the degree of self-discipline on school health nursing activities 1) Program planning & evaluation; Level of nursing education (F=4.309 p<.01) 2) Clinical management: Level of nursing education (F=3.587 p<.05) 3) Operating of school health organization: School health organization (t=-2.68 p<.01) 4) Health care services: School health organization (t=2,58 p<.05) 5) School health performance: School health organization (t=2.32 p<.05) 6) Program planning & evaluation: School health experience (r=0.239 p<.01) Expending time for program planning & evaluation (r=-0.172 p<.05) 7) Clinic management: School health experience (r=0.249 p<.01) Expending time for dinic management (r=0.181 p<.05) No. of student (r=-0.158 p<.05) Expending time of program planning & evaluation (r=-0.199 p<0.5) 8) Health education: School health experience (r=0.234 p<0.1) Expending time of program planning & evaluation (r=-0.193 p<.05) 9) Management of school environment: Age of school health teacher (r=0.142 p<.05) School health experience (r=0.255 p<.01) 10) Operating of school health organization: Medicine Purchase (r=-0.163 p<.05) 11) Health care services: School health experience (r=0.148 p<.05) Medicine purchase (r=-0.229 p<.01) 12) Total school health performance: School health experience (r=0.200 p<.05) Medicine purchase(r=-0.168 p<.05) Based on the above results, the suggestions are as follows: 1) As the SHT take charge of the reasonable number of student, the students will have benefit of the good health service in quality. 2) It is recommended to use the health clinic separately and to arrange adequate place for good school health service. 3) It is necessary that the SHT participate budget for school health. 4) It is required to enhance self-confidence on school health nursing activities through continuous educational programs.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.17-29
• /
• 2006

목적: 호주 일 지역의 종합병원을 중심으로 이루어지고 있는 호스피스 자원봉사자들의 특성을 파악하고 이들이 실제 환자들에게 시행하고 있는 활동내용과 그 만족도를 파악하기 위하여 시도하였다. 방법: 101명의 자가보고 질문지에 의해 자료수집되었으며, 자료의 분석은 SPSS/WIN 12.0 프로그램을 이용하여 다음과 같이 빈도와 백분율, 평균과 표준편차로 분석하였다. 결과: 1. 병원에서의 봉사활동경력은 $5{\sim}10$년이 32.7%, 10년 이상이 30.7%, $2{\sim}3$년이 11.9%, $3{\sim}5$년이 10.9%의 순이었다. 주요 봉사활동 형태는 신체적 간호가 32.7%, 신체 및 정서적 간호가 14.9%, 기타가 18.8%의 순이었다. 봉사업무할당 방법은 봉사활동 조정자에 의해서가 55.7%, 봉사자의 뜻에 따라서와 봉사자와 조정자의 합의에 의해서가 각각 20.5%의 순이었다. 봉사활동을 하는 주요 이유는 아픈 사람을 돕고 싶어서가 61.4%로 가장 많았으며, 다음은 여가시간을 선용하기 위해서가 22.8%였다. 봉사활동을 시작하게 된 경로는 자신의 조사에 의해서가 43.4%로 가장 많았으며, 다음은 다른 봉사자로부터 듣고서가 30.7%, 대중매체로부터가 13.1%의 순이었다. 봉사활동관련 교육을 받은 여부는 받았다가 80.2%였다. 봉사활동업무가 자신의 기술과 기능에 맞는 정도는 아주 잘 맞는다가 74.0%였고, 다음은 대체로 맞는다가 18.0%로 대체로 잘 맞는 것으로 나타났다. 봉사활동에 대해 받는 보상은 토큰이나 점심 혹은 집단 소풍이 31.7%로 가장 많았고, 다음은 토큰과 점심이나 집단 소풍이 각각 19.8%였다. 봉사활동에 대한 평가빈도는 이따금이 37.2%, 자주가 30.9%, 항상이 17.0%, 전혀 안 함이 14.9%의 순이었다. 봉사활동조정자와 관계는 매우 좋다가 85.0%로 대부분을 차지하였으며, 다른 봉사자와의 관계는 매우 좋다가 81.2%로 대부분을 차지하였고, 병원직원과의 관계는 매우 좋다가 69.7%였고, 다음은 대체로 좋다가 21.2%의 순이었다. 봉사활동에 대해 가족이나 친구의 지지는 어떠한가는 매우 좋다가 83.2%로 대부분을 차지하였다. 2. 대상자의 자원봉사활동 만족도는 평점 $3.09{\pm}0.49$(도구범위 $1{\sim}4$점)로 중간정도이었다. 영역별로 살펴보았을 때 만족도가 가장 높았던 영역은 사회적 접촉영역($3.48{\pm}0.61$)이었고, 다음은 성취영역($3.43{\pm}0.53$), 사회적 인정영역($3.35{\pm}0.70$)의 순이었다. 만족도가 가장 낮았던 영역은 사회적 교환영역($1.65{\pm}0.63$)이었다. 3. 대상자의 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 봉사활동 만족도를 분석한 결과 성별(t=2.038, P=0.044), 결혼상태(F=3.806, P=0.013)에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였다. 4. 대상자의 자원봉사활동 실태에 따른 봉사활동 만족도를 분석한 결과병원봉사활동기간(F=3.326, P=0.008), 봉사활동을 하는 주된 이유(F=2.707, P=0.035), 봉사활동을 위한 교육을 받은 여부(t=-1.982, P=0.050), 봉사활동의 평가 빈도(F=7.877, P=0.000), 봉사활동이 자신의 기술이나 능력에 적합도(F=2.712, P=0.049), 관리자와의 관계(t=-2.517, P=0.013), 다른 병원직원과의 관계(F=5.202, P=0.007), 자원봉사자로서의 활동에 대해 가족이나 친지로부터의 지지(t=-3.394, P=0.001)에 따라 봉사활동 만족도가 유의하게 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 자원봉사활동 만족도는 중간정도이었고, 봉사활동 만족도는 대상자의 인구사회학적 특성에 따라서는 성별(t=2.038, P=0.044), 결혼상태(F=3.806, P=0.013)에 따라 유의한 차이를 보였고, 자원봉사활동 실태에 따라서는 병원봉사활동기간(F=3.326, P=0.008), 봉사활동을 하는 주된 이유(F=2.707, P=0.035), 봉사활동을 위한 교육을 받은 여부(t=-1.982, P=0.030), 봉사활동의 평가 빈도(F=7.877, P=0.000), 봉사활동이 자신의 기술이나 능력에 적합도(F=2.712, P=0.049), 관리자와의 관계(t=-2.517, P=0.013), 다른 병원직원과의 관계(F=5.202, P=0.007), 자원봉사자로서의 활동에 대해 가족이나 친지로부터의 지지(t=-3.394, P=0.001)에 따라 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 자원봉사자를 관리할 때에 위의 요인들을 고려할 것이 요구된다고 볼 수 있다.