• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.335-351
• /
• 2013

This research assumes that abduction is so important as much as all the creative plausible reasoning to be based upon. We expect it to be deeply appreciated and be taught positively in school mathematics. We are noticing that every problem solving process must contain some steps of abduction and thus, we believe that those who are afraid of abduction cannot solve any newly faced problem. Upon these thoughts, we are looking into the middle school mathematics textbooks to see that how strongly various abductions are emphasized to solve problems in it. We modified types of abduction those were suggested by Eco(1983) or by Bettina Pedemonte, David Reid (2011) and investigated those books to see if, we may regard, various types of abduction be intended to be used to solve their problems. As a result of it, we found that more than 92% of the problems were not supposed to use creative abduction necessarily to solve it. And we interpret this as most authors of the textbooks have emphasis more on the capturing and understanding of basic knowledge of school mathematics rather than the creative reasoning through them. And we believe this need innovation, otherwise strong debates are necessary among the professionals of it.