• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.309-326
• /
• 2011

Most metadata quality measurement employ simple techniques by counting error records. This study presents a new quantitative measurement of metadata quality using advanced weighting schemes in order to overcome the limitations of exiting measurement techniques. Entropy, user tasks, and usage statistics were used to calculate the weights. Integrated weights were presented by combining these weights and were applied to actual journal article metadata. Entropy weights were found to reflect the characteristics of the data itself. User tasks presented the required metadata elements to solve user's information need. Integrated weights showed balanced measures without being affected by the influence of error elements, This finding indicates the new method being suitable for quantitative measurement of metadata quality.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2012.10a
• /
• pp.84-87
• /
• 2012

대분분의 검색 엔진에서 색인어의 추출 및 가중치의 부여방법은 매우 중요한 연구주제로, 검색 엔진의 성능에 큰 영항을 미친다. 일반적으로, 불용어 리스트를 통해 성능에 긍정적인 영향을 미치지 않는 색인어를 제거하거나, 핵심어 또는 전문용어 등 상대적으로 중요한 색인어를 강조하는 방식을 사용하여 검색엔진의 성능을 향상시킨다. 하지만, 어절 분리, 형태소 분석, 불용어 처리 등 검색엔진의 단계열 처리 과정에서, 개별적인 색인어가 검색엔진에 미치는 영향을 분석하고 이를 반영한 검색 엔진 성능 향상 기법은 제시되지 않고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 각 단계별 처리 과정에서 생성된 색인어가 미치는 영항을 계랑화하여 긍정적/부정적 색인어를 분류하는 방법론을 소개하고, 이를 기반으로 색인어 가중치를 조절함으로써 검색 엔진의 성능 또한 향상 가능한 방법을 소개한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2004.05b
• /
• pp.854-858
• /
• 2004

수자원 계획 및 관리 분야에서는 여러 상반된 기준들을 고려하여 의사결정을 내려야 하는 상황이 매우 빈번하게 발생한다. 따라서 이러한 상충되는 기준들에서 최적의 대안들을 찾고 이를 결정하기 위해 다기준 의사결정 분석과 같은 방법을 고려할 필요가 있다. 다기준 의사결정의 중요한 특징은 목적과 기준을 설정, 상대적 가중치들을 추정, 개별 성능 기준에 대한 대안들의 기여도를 결정하는데 있어서 의사 결정자의 판단에 중점을 두는 것이다. 주관적인 견해가 너무 많이 산재할 경우는 문제가 될 수 있지만, 원칙적으로 다기준 의사결정은 목적, 기준, 가중치 및 목표 달성 평가에 내한 의사결정자의 선택을 중시하며, 이를 과학적이고 명확한 방법으로 표현할 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있다. 또한 다기준 의사결정방법들은 비용-편익 분석의 실무적인 한계를 초월하는 의사결정 사안들을 위한 구조, 분석 방법, 융통성을 가지고 있기도 한다. 본 연구에서는 최근 국내 수자원 계획 및 관리 분야에 적용되는 계층화분석방법 이외에 유럽 등지에서 많이 활용되고 있는 가치함수법, Outranking 방법 등을 소개하고자 기준에 대한 대안들의 점수를 부여하는 방법과 가중치 산정 방법을 소개하였다. 또한 수자원 분야에 적용되었던 다기준 의사결정분석 방법을 소개함으로써 국내 수자원 분야에서 발생할 수 있는 여러 상반된 기준을 고려시 최적의 대안을 찾아내는데 중요한 정보를 제공하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
• /
• v.107 no.4
• /
• pp.446-455
• /
• 2018

With respect to the quantity, quality and social value of forest jobs, we have developed three major criteria and 11 indicators for evaluating decent forest jobs. The importance and weighted value of the criteria and indicators were investigated through a survey which was conducted on 50 experts involved in Governmental Forest Job Committee, academic and different groups of communities. The 35 experts responded to the survey chose the 'job creation potential' as the most important criterion, and they recognized the 'job quality' has a relatively higher importance than the 'social contribution'. The survey results showed that 'political will' and 'job security' have the highest weighted values among indicators while 'wage level' has the lowest value. The developed criteria and indicators are able to be used as a means of evaluating degree of decent forest jobs for both new and existing jobs.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.10 no.10
• /
• pp.259-266
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study was to examine the need for changes in the administration strategies of hospitals which would be vital for building up competitiveness of hospitals amid the changes in medical market. For that, 20 experts with doctoral degree in public administration and business administration related to the field of hospital administration were selected as the sampling group in the survey. Regarding the method of AHP survey as in this survey. The results showed that the factors were important in the order of medical staff factor(ranked first), overall facility factor(ranked second), staff service factor(ranked third), and access factor(ranked fourth). Second, the relative importance was in the order of medical staff specialization(ranked first), medical staff diversity(ranked second), and medical equipment level(ranked third), regarding the relative importance for general hospital development strategy and the complex weighted value for relative importance.

• Archives of design research
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.131-138
• /
• 2000

The evaluation of design is one of the most important steps in design process. However, because in most cases, design evaluation has been disregarded in comparison with other steps and has been performed by designer's subjective judgment. there are few studies for the development of systematic methodology. In this study, we developed the method of design evaluation using the fuzzy theory and the multi-criteria dedsion making model. This method consists of two steps. The first step is to obtain relative importance weights of design evaluation criteria, and the second step is to obtain and integrate scores for design evaluation criteria. AHP(analytic hierarchy process) and fuzzy theory were applied to the first and the second step, respectively. We applied the developed method to the sensible evaluation of cellular phone design. As the result, we verified that the developed method could be effectively used in the evaluation of product design.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.35 no.6
• /
• pp.685-692
• /
• 2002

It is very useful to estimate easily the various characteristics of streams and to manage objectively streams, as the order or grade among streams is determined by the natural characteristics and the degree of human utilization. With obtainable various statistics data and expert examination, we proposed the measurable evaluation index of "stream weight" considering the natural characteristics of streams, the utilization degree of streams and the social conditions of the regions crossed streams. The each stream weight is calculated as follows. Firstly, select the various factors which influence to streams in AHP. Secondly, determine the each weight of factors by the result of expert examination. Finally, sum up after multiplying the normalized factors by these two values. The stream weight can be used such divisions as the recognization of relative weight between streams, the determination of the stream management direction in the near future, the enhancement of the efficiency of stream management through the adjustment of the present stream grade and the determination of the management method concerned the stream weight as well.t as well.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.743-746
• /
• 2006

온라인 미디어의 발전으로 인터넷 신문 웹사이트의 유형과 범위도 확대되고 그에 따른 정확한 평가가 필요해지고 있다. 특히 웹사이트의 유형에 따라 평가요인의 상대적 중요도가 다르기 때문에, 그에 따라 요소들의 중요도를 정확히 추출하는 것이 중요하다. 그러나 인터넷 신문 웹사이트 평가요소를 합리적으로 산출하는 방법에 관한 연구는 아직 미흡하다. 본 논문에서는 인터넷 신문 웹사이트의 특화된 요인을 산출하고 분석하기 위하여 HP 기법을 적용하였다. 특히, 인터넷 신문 평가를 위해 처음으로 평가 요소의 가중치를 활용하였다. 이러한 신출물에 대한 분석 결과는 새로운 인터넷 미디어 서비스 개발에 활용될 수 있다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.47-71
• /
• 2009

The mission of public library is to contribute to local society's growth and improve local residents' quality of life by satisfying local residents' desire on information use, cultural activities, lifelong education, etc, and providing more convenient and equal access. This study is a research that deducted BSC-based public library performance indicator model composed of 12 critical success factors, 36 key performance indicators under four perspectives of learning and growth perspective, internal process perspective, resources perspective, and user perspective, estimated relative weights of deducted the performance indicator model on librarians of public libraries to analyze what performance indicator is important for accomplishing public library's mission and promoting performance.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.119-125
• /
• 2010

The most important part in the decision making is to decide the weight of attributes which indicate the relative importance of the properties to be estimated with different criteria respectively. In this study, the new MCDM method which consider typical preexisting methods all together is proposed. For doing those, Weighted Utopian Approach is newly suggested by combining typical 7 weighting methods and distance-based Utopian Approach which is one of the MCDM methods. The suggested method has the advantage of accomplishing representativeness and universality of the MCDM methods because it incorporates multiple weighting methods of diverse characteristics. It also yields not only the one final result but also the results calculated from each weighting method, broadening the options of the choice to the alternatives. The application of the new model to virtual engineering problems show that we can perform the decision making and the assessment of priority order more objectively with it and that it has high applicability to the practice, giving us simple calculation process.