• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.101-104
• /
• 1981

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.155-160
• /
• 1987

• Proceedings of the KHMA Conference
• /
• 2001.05a
• /
• pp.53-54
• /
• 2001

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.6-7
• /
• 1959

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.1-35
• /
• 1982

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.161-163
• /
• 1959

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.62-64
• /
• 1971

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.65-84
• /
• 2008

Historically the value of the secondary Home Economics subject matter has been justified with the extrinsic aim to satisfy the needs of the individual and family and of the society. The purpose of this study is to investigate the educational and philosophical significance of the knowledge in Home Economics education through reasoning out its intrinsic aim. From the point of discipline-based curriculum, Home Economics as 'the structure of knowledge' constitutes the curriculum of the secondary Home Economics subject matter and contributes to understanding the family life intellectually with its unique perspective. When students understand these theoretical contents, they will internalize the core idea of Home Economics so that their cognitive perspective on family life is developed or widened. With this cognitive perspective, they are able to discover the aspect of family life from their daily life, to interpret and judge every situation properly. It is the presupposition of socially expected practical problem solving that makes Home Economics education intrinsically meaningful. In conclusion, the secondary Home Economics curriculum needs to be reinterpreted or reorganized as the structure of knowledge, not as fragmentary informations or facts, through which the broad cognitive perspective on family life is developed and Home Economist's mode of thinking is transmitted.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.17 no.4 s.38
• /
• pp.55-71
• /
• 2005

This study attempts to analyze research Quality about home economics and education, based on the studies in the Journal of Korean Home Ecomics Education. The purpose of this study is to investigate the recent studies in hem economics and find out the desirable direction of it. The findings of study are as follow: While the numbers of articles appeared in The Korea Association of Practical Arts Education and Korean Home Economics Education Association are increasing, The Korean Home economics Association does not show the increase the number of articles. According to the historical changes and distribution, the majority was teaching-learning method and teaching materials. Also, from the point of view in research thesis, there were more articles in home economics and education than any others, In addition, among the various types of research, survey was most frequently used. There was significant differences of the sizes of groups according to the different journals, but the one group research was most frequent and one certain research area was dominant. The teams consist of two people showed the highest ratio, and junior high and high school were the most frequently researched institutions. Generally, it is hard to find research grant. Though there is much difference in numbers of references based upon various journals, almost all articles cited reference date not only from Korean articles, but also from international articles.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.17 no.1 s.35
• /
• pp.131-151
• /
• 2005

This study analyzes the Textbook of Home Economics published by 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom(玄公廉)' that was the first textbook approved by the Korean Government and also disapproved by the Japanese Government. The results of the study are summarized as follows. 1. The Korean Government appointed the textbooks used in school. The textbooks of home economics appointed in 1910 were 'Hanmun Gajeonghak(漢文家政學)' and 'Sinpyeon Gajeonghak(新編家政學)'. But Japanese government disapproved these textbooks soon after it fully controlled Korea. 2. 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom' who published the textbook of home economics was from translator family that was famous since early Chosun Dynasty. The translator at that time with good command of foreign language introduced foreign books to the intellectuals of Chosun Dynasty. The textbook of home economics was also translated at that time. 3. 'Hanmun Gajeonghak', 'Sinpyeon Gajeonghak' and 'Sinjeong Gajeonghak(新政家政學)' published by 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom' were the translations of the same book. 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom' published the 'Hanmun Gajeonghak' written in Chinese character and 'Sinpyeon Gajeonghak' written in Korean and Chinese character in combination in December 1907, which were translations of the textbook of home economics published by 'Oh Yeo Ryoon(吳汝綸)' in China in July 1902. The textbook of 'Oh Yeo Ryoon' was the Chinese translation of the 'Sinseon Gajeonghak (新選家政學)' that was published by 'Shimoda Utako(下田歌子), in Japan in 1900. 4. The textbook of home economics written by 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom' was composed of five units, that is, general introduction, management of family members, family norms, family hygiene and home economy. The composition of the book by 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom' was quite different from that of 'Sinseon Gajeonghak' by 'Shimoda Utako'. This difference was made in the textbook of home economics of 'Oh Yeo Ryoon'. 5. The characteristics of home in the textbook of home economics by 'Hyun Kong-Ryeom' were summarized as follows. (1)Home as a national basic unit. (2)Home for education, (3)Home for rest, (4)Home for the consumption.