• 설비공학논문집
• /
• 제15권10호
• /
• pp.879-887
• /
• 2003

Buildings with heating and cooling systems have been increased, since the requirement of thermal comfort for residents is grown. Heating and cooling systems, have been changed from two separate systems to one multi-function system which includes both heating and cooling. Especially, heat pump heating and cooling system has been adopted for general classrooms in schools since education environment improvement project has been launched. This research suggests the best option for the heat pump heating and cooling system in educational buildings through economic assessments for four alternative systems based on electric heat pump (EHP) and gas engine driven heat pump (GHP), which are most widely used for elementary, middle and high schools. The model buildings are in the Y high school which has 24 classes of new construction building, which will be built soon. Annual energy consumption for alternative systems uses BECS 3.10, which can be used for system simulation.

• 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한설비공학회 2009년도 하계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.212-217
• /
• 2009

냉방기기별 하절기 가동률 및 동시사용률 실태를 조사하여 건물의 용도 및 면적 별냉방기기의 시간별 부하률 과 동시사용률, 연간 사용일수 가동시간을 조사하여 냉방기기별 에너지 소비현황 하절기 에너지수급 영향분석을 하고자 하였다. 그리고 국내에 설치된 냉방기기를 대상으로 현장조사 진단을 통해 냉방기기 사용 실태 및 냉방성능을 측정하고, 현장 조사를 통한 만족도와 불만사항을 조사하여 냉방기기 보급 및 운전의 효율을 상승시키고 모든 냉방기기 국산화를 위한 기초자료와 이를 위한 정책적 지원방안 및 향후 냉방기기 기술개발 방향을 제시하고자 한다. 또한 냉방기기별로 문제점을 도출하여 향후 정책제도 개선에 반영할 수 있도록 하였다.

• 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한설비공학회 2006년도 하계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.921-926
• /
• 2006

The present study has been conducted economic analysis through actual operation of EHP and GHP which are installed at the same building of an university Cost items, such as initial cost, annual energy cost and maintenance cost of each system are considered to analyze LCC and economical efficiency is compared. The initial cost is considered on the basis of actual costs, and annual energy cost is converted into the cost after measuring electricity and gas consumption a day. LCC applied present value method is used to assess economical efficiency of both them. Variables used to LCC analysis are electricity cost escalation rate, natural gas cost escalation rate, interest rate, and service lives and when each of them are 4%, 2%, 8%, and 20 years, results of analysis short that EHP(148,257,306 won) is 8.05%(12,981,990 won) more profitable than GHP(161,239,295 won).

• 설비공학논문집
• /
• 제19권6호
• /
• pp.470-475
• /
• 2007

The present study has been conducted economic analysis through actual operation of electric heat pump (EHP) and gas engine driven heat pump (GHP) which are installed at the same building in the university. Cost items, such as initial cost, annual energy cost and maintenance cost of each system are considered to analyze life cycle cost (LCC) and economical efficiencies are compared. The initial cost is considered on the basis of actual cost, and annual energy cost is converted into the cost after measuring electricity and gas consumption a day LCC applied present value method is used to assess economical profit of both of them. Variables used to LCC analysis are electricity cost escalation rate, natural gas cost escalation rate, interest rate, and service lives when each of them are 4%, 2%, 8%, and 20 years. The result shows that EHP (148,257,306 won) is more profitable than GHP (161,239,296 won) by 8.05% (12,981,990 won).