• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.119-124
• /
• 2009

연구목적: 치과 영역에서 환자들의 심미적인 요구가 증가하면서 자연 치아의 색조를 재현할 수 있는 수복물의 개발이 이루어졌으며, 이러한 연구의 일환으로 도재와 복합레진의 특성을 겸비한 Ceromer(Ceramic Optimized Polymer)가 개발되었다. Ceromer는 기존의 복합레진에 무기질을 고밀도로 충전하여 물리적 성질을 향상시켰다. 연구 재료 및 방법:본 실험에서는 두 종류의 Ceromer[$Targis^{(R)}$(Ivoclar-vivadent AG., Schaan, Liechtenstein), $BelleGlass^{(R)}$(Kerr Co., Orange, CA, USA)]를 이용해 레진 전장관 형태의 시편을 제작하고 증류수에 침전한 후 발생하는 체적과 중량의 변화를 관찰하였다. 결과 및 결론:두 종류의 Ceromer 모두 수중 침적 시간이 증가할수록 높이와 폭이 증가되었으며, $Targis^{(R)}$보다 $BelleGlass^{(R)}$에서 더 큰 누적변화율을 보였다. 72시간까지 급격한 증가를 보이다 이후 누적변화율의 증가는 감소하였다. 통계적 분석결과 $Targis^{(R)}$의 높이와 무게의 누적 변화량이 24시간군과 나머지군 사이에 유의한 차이를 보였으며, $BelleGlass^{(R)}$에서는 폭과 무게에서 누적 변화량이 24시간군과 나머지군 사이에 유의한 차이를 보였다(<.05). $Targis^{(R)}$와 $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ 두 군간의 비교에서는 높이, 폭, 무게의 변화량은 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았으나 변화양상은 다르게 관찰되었다.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.438-452
• /
• 2005

Statement of problem: The use of Ceromer is increasing in dentistry. But, the research of Ceromer has not been conducted much. Purpose : This study was to evaluate the marginal fidelity and internal adaptation according to marginal position. Materials and Methods: In this study 60 resin crowns were fabricated. The measurements of the marginal fidelity were carried out using stereomicroscope $SZ-40^{(R)}$ (Olympus, Japan) and the measurements of fracture strength were done using Instron $8871^{(R)}$ (Instron Co., U.S.A.) at a cross head speed of 1mm/min. All of the measurements were statistically analyzed by ANOVA test, multiple range test and Weibull analysis. Statistical significance was set in advance at the probability level of less than 0.05. All of the measurements were analyzed with Window $SPSS^{(R)}$ Version 10.0 soft ware for the personal computer. Results : 1. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, but difference between these two and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 2. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each maerial and with/without fiber group in the marginal fidelity 3. There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Tescera^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ but no statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 4 There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each material and with/without fiber group in the fracture strength. 5. When comparing the fracture surface, no fiber group showed the resin which were fractured at the labial surface and separated from the adhesion surface. In fiber group, the fractures took a place in resin compartments. Conclusion. The marginal fidelity and the fracture strength were clinically acceptable. From these results, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$ were superior than $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ in the marginal fidelity But, when applying these resin crowns in clinic, more careful consideration is needed and further study is recommended.