Browse > Article

A STUDY ON THE MARGINAL FIDELITY AND THE FRACTURE STRENGTH OF CEROMERS  

Chang Hee-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, National Police Hospital)
Lee Jong-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Lim Heon-Song (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Cho In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.43, no.4, 2005 , pp. 438-452 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: The use of Ceromer is increasing in dentistry. But, the research of Ceromer has not been conducted much. Purpose : This study was to evaluate the marginal fidelity and internal adaptation according to marginal position. Materials and Methods: In this study 60 resin crowns were fabricated. The measurements of the marginal fidelity were carried out using stereomicroscope $SZ-40^{(R)}$ (Olympus, Japan) and the measurements of fracture strength were done using Instron $8871^{(R)}$ (Instron Co., U.S.A.) at a cross head speed of 1mm/min. All of the measurements were statistically analyzed by ANOVA test, multiple range test and Weibull analysis. Statistical significance was set in advance at the probability level of less than 0.05. All of the measurements were analyzed with Window $SPSS^{(R)}$ Version 10.0 soft ware for the personal computer. Results : 1. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, but difference between these two and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 2. There were no statistical differences of the marginal fidelity between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each maerial and with/without fiber group in the marginal fidelity 3. There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Tescera^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ but no statistical differences of the fracture strength between $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ according to materials. 4 There were statistical differences of the fracture strength between no fiber group and fiber group. There were no interactions between each material and with/without fiber group in the fracture strength. 5. When comparing the fracture surface, no fiber group showed the resin which were fractured at the labial surface and separated from the adhesion surface. In fiber group, the fractures took a place in resin compartments. Conclusion. The marginal fidelity and the fracture strength were clinically acceptable. From these results, $Targis^{(R)}$ and $Tescera^{(R)}$ were superior than $BelleGlass^{(R)}$ in the marginal fidelity But, when applying these resin crowns in clinic, more careful consideration is needed and further study is recommended.
Keywords
$Targis^{(R)}$; $Tescera^{(R)}$; $BelleGlass^{(R)}$; Marginal fidelity; Fracture strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 McLean JW. Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965:119:251-267   PUBMED
2 Sadoun, M. All ceramic bridges with the slip casting technique. present ed at the 7th International Symposium on Ceramics. Paris, 1988. September
3 Jeong CS. Kim KS. A study on the marginal fidelity and fracture strength of Artglass and Targis. Collected papers of Dankook University 1998
4 Lisa A. Knobloch, Ronald E. Kerby, Robert Seghi, Meade van Putten. Two-body wear resistance and degree of conversion labo- ratory-processed composite materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999:12:432-438   PUBMED
5 Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby: 1996. p56
6 Lee HK, Cho IH. Study on the marginal fidelity and the fracture strength of AllCeramic crowns. Collected papers of Dankook University 2002
7 Lim JH. Study on the marginal fidelity and the fracture strength of In-Coram crown according to luting cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998: 36: 888-898
8 May KB, Russel MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision fit : the Procera All-Ceramic Crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998:80:394-404   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Marc Loose, Martin Rosentritt, Alexander Leibrock. In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Res Dent 1998:6:55-62
10 Derand T. Stress analysis of cemented or resin-bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1999:7:21-24
11 Carola Kolbeck, Martin Rosentritt, Michael Behr, Reinhold Lang, Gerhard Handel. In vitro examination of the fracture strength of 3 different fiber-reinforced composite and 1 all-ceramic posterior inlay fixed partial denture systems. J Prosthodont 2002: 11: 248-253   DOI   ScienceOn
12 ADA specification No 8, Council on dental material and devices. J Am Dent Assoc 1978. p96
13 Ku CW, Park SW, Yang HS. Comparison of the fracture strengths of metal-ceramic crowns and three ceromer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2002: 88: 170-175   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Suh BI. New concepts and technology for processing of indirect composites. Compendium sup 2003: 24 :40-42
15 Kern M. Schaller HG. Strub JR. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in FiFO. Int J Prosthodont 1993: 6:585-591   PUBMED
16 Lee SH, Lee YG, Lim BS, Kim CW. Change in the optical properties of laboratory resin composites after thermocycling. Dental Materials Jounal SNU. 2002:12:517
17 Kim SJ. Shin SW. Han JS. Suh KW. Marginal Fitness and marginal leakage of fiber-reinforced composite crowns depending upon luting cements. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000:38:618-630
18 Joo YJ, Cho IH. On the marginal fidelity of All-Ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM method. Collected papers of Dankook University 2003
19 Shinohara N, Minesaki Y, Mukoyoshi N, Moriyama, Jimi T. The effect of the cementing material on the strength of the all ceramic crown. J Jpn Prosthodont 1989: 33:416   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay casting. J Prosthet Dent 1966: 16: 297-305   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
21 Michael Behr, M. Rosentritt, D. Latzel, T. Kreisler. Comparison of three of fiberreinforced composite molar crowns on their resistance and mar ginal adaptation. J Dent 2001:29: 187-196   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Land CH. A new system of restoring badly decayed teeth by means of an enamelled metallic coating. Independent Practitioner 1886:7:407
23 Russel Giordano II. Fiber reinforced composite resin systems. General Dentistry 2000:May/June:244-249   PUBMED
24 T. Nakamura, T. Ohyama, A. Imanishi, S. lshigaki. Fracture resistance of pressable glass-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabilitation 2002:29:951-955   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Jorgensen KD. Factors affecting the film thickness of zinc phosphate cements. Acta Odontol Scan 1960: 18:479-490   DOI
26 J. Robert Holmes. William D. Sulik. Gene A. Holland. Stephen C. Bayne. Marginal fit of casable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992:67:594-599   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Ryu JH. Kim YC. Kang DW. Study on the marginal fidelity and the fracture strength of IPS-Empress. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000:38:606-617
28 Cho LR, Song HY, Koak JY, Heo SJ. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: Effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002: 88: 388-395   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Rosentiel SF. Porter SS. Apparent fracture toughness of dental porcelain with a metal substructure. Dent Mater 1988;4: 1897-1990
30 John A. Sorensen. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Presthet Dent 1990:64: 18-24   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
31 Shane N. White. Zhaokun Yu. Victor Kipnis. Effect of seating force on film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992:68:476-481   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Robert W. Loney, M. Brent Moulding, Ron G. Ritsco. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. lnt J Prostho 1995:8:247-251