Browse > Article

Determination of sample size to serological surveillance plan for pullorum disease and fowl typhoid  

Pak, Son-Il (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
Park, Choi-Kyu (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research / v.48, no.4, 2008 , pp. 457-462 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine appropriate sample size that simulated different assumptions for diagnostic test characteristics and true prevalences when designing serological surveillance plan for pullorum disease and fowl typhoid in domestic poultry production. The number of flocks and total number of chickens to be sampled was obtained to provide 95% confidence of detecting at least one infected flock, taking imperfect diagnostic tests into account. Due to lack of reliable data, within infected flock prevalence (WFP) was assumed to follow minimum 1%, most likely 5% and maximum 9% and true flock prevalence of 0.1%, 0.5% and 1% in order. Sensitivity were modeled using the Pert distribution: minimum 75%, most likely 80% and maximum 90% for plate agglutination test and 80%, 85%, and 90% for ELISA test. Similarly, the specificity was modeled 85%, 90%, 95% for plate agglutination test and 90%, 95%, 99% for ELISA test. In accordance with the current regulation, flock-level test characteristics calculated assuming that 30 samples are taken from per flock. The model showed that the current 112,000 annual number of testing plan which is based on random selection of flocks is far beyond the sample size estimated in this study. The sample size was further reduced with increased sensitivity and specificity of the test and decreased WFP. The effect of increasing samples per flock on total sample size to be sampled and optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity of the test for the purpose of the surveillance is discussed regarding cost.
Keywords
fowl typhoid; pullorum disease; sample size; serosurveillance; simulation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 농림부. 종계장, 부화장 방역관리 요령. 농림부고시 제 2004-74호. 농림부, 과천, 2004
2 농림부. 2007년 가축방역사업계획 및 실시요령. 농림부, 과천, 2007
3 Rogan WJ, Gladen B. Estimating prevalence from the results of a screening test. Am J Epidemiol 1978, 107, 71-76   DOI
4 Pomeroy BS, Nagaraja KV. Fowl typhoid. In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, Reid WM, Yoder HW Jr (eds.) Disease of Poultry. 9th ed. pp. 87-99, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1991
5 Horsfall DJ, Rowley D, Jenkin CR. The titre of bactericidal antibody against Salmonella gallinarum in chicks. Immunology 1970, 18, 595-598
6 Shivaprasad HL. Pullorum disease and fowl typhoid. In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, McDougald LR, Saif YM (eds.) Disease of Poultry. 10th ed. pp. 82-96, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1997
7 Turnbull PC, Snoeyenbos GH. Experimental salmonellosis in the chicken. 2. Fate of a temperaturesensitive filamentous mutant. Avian Dis 1974, 18, 178-185   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ziller M, Selhorst T, Teuffert J, Kramer M, Schluter H. Analysis of sampling strategies to substantiate freedom from disease in large areas. Prev Vet Med 2002, 52, 333-343   DOI   ScienceOn
9 농림부. 추백리방역실시요령. 농림부고시 제 1999-25호. 농림부, 과천, 1999
10 Cameron AR, Baldock FC. Two-stage sampling in surveys to substantiate freedom from disease. Prev Vet Med 1998, 34, 19-30   DOI   ScienceOn
11 농림부. 2006년 가축방역사업계획 및 실시요령. 농림부, 과천, 2006
12 김애란, 김재홍, 이영주, 조영미, 권준헌, 권용국, 이윤정, 최준구, 조성준, 김민철, 이은경, 김창섭, 양홍구, 곽상익, 성환우, 모인필. 2003년 국내 원종계 및 종계의 추백리-가금티푸스 감염실태. 대한수의학회지 2006, 46, 347-353
13 Snoeyenbos GH. Pullorum disease. In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, Reid WM, Yoder HW Jr (eds.) Disease of Poultry. 9th ed. pp. 73-86, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1991
14 Johnson DC, Keenum KG, Perry HP. A fowl typhoid outbreak in a chicken breeder flock. Avian Dis 1977, 21, 716-719   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Barrow PA, Huggins MB, Lovell MA. Host specificity of Salmonella infection in chickens and mice is expressed in vivo primarily at the level of the reticuloendothelial system. Infect Immun 1994, 62, 4602-4610