Browse > Article

Optimization of monitoring methods for air-borne bacteria in the environmental conditions of pig facilities  

Lee, Deok-Yong (College of Veterinary Medicine, KRF Zoonotic Priority Research Institute and BK21 for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University)
Seo, Yeon-Soo (College of Veterinary Medicine, KRF Zoonotic Priority Research Institute and BK21 for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University)
Kang, Sang-Gyun (College of Veterinary Medicine, KRF Zoonotic Priority Research Institute and BK21 for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University)
Yoo, Han Sang (College of Veterinary Medicine, KRF Zoonotic Priority Research Institute and BK21 for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research / v.46, no.3, 2006 , pp. 255-261 More about this Journal
Abstract
Experimental animals have been used to biological and medical purposes and the animals must be, for these purposes, healthy and clean to microbial infection. However, the animals can be easily exposed to pathogenic microorganism via several routes. Of the routes, environmental conditions are the most important factors to keep the animals healthy and clean, especially air condition. Monitoring of air-condition has been required to keep the animal healthy and clean. However, any guideline is not available for experimental conditions with pigs. Therefore, the sampling times and points were compared in different conditions to establish an optimal protocol for monitoring of air borne bacteria. Tryptic soy agar(TSA), blood agar containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood and Sabraud dextrose agar(SDA) were used as media to capture total bacteria, pathogenic bacteria and fungi, respectively. Two methods, compulsive capture using an air-sampler and capturing fall-down bacteria were used to capture the microorganisms in the air. The points and time of capturing were different at each experiment. Air borne microorganisms were captured at three and five points in the open and closed equipments, respectively. Air was collected using an air-sampler for 1 min and 5 min and the agar plates as open status were left from 30 min to 2hr. At first, we monitored an experimental laboratory which dealt with several pathogenic bacteria and then, a protocol obtained from the investigation was applied to open or close experimental conditions with pigs. Number of bacteria was high from 10:00 to 15:00, especially on 13:30-15:30 but sharply decreased after 17:00. The tendency of the number of bacteria was similar between two methods even though the absolute number was higher with air sampler. Critical difference in the number of cells was observed at 5 min with air sampler and 2 hr with fall-down capturing method. However, 1 min with air sampler and 1 hr with fall-down capturing were the best condition to identify bacterial species collected from the air. Number of bacteria were different depending on the sampling points in closed condition but not in opened condition. Based on our results, a guide-line was suggested for screening air-borne microorganism in the experimental conditions with pigs.
Keywords
monitoring method; air-borne bacteria; environmental condition;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fields ND, Oxborrow GS, Puleo JR, Herring CM. Evaluation of membrane filter field monitors for microbiological air sampling. Appl Microbiol. 1974, 27, 517-520
2 Hong JB, Chung YH, Chang YH. Distribution of Hospital Air borne Microrganisms in Seoul, Korea. Kor J Env Hlth. 2003, 29, 1-7
3 Richardson MD, Rennie S, Marshall I, Morgan MG, Murphy JA, Shankland GS, Watson WH, Soutar RL. Fungal surveillance of an open haematology ward J Hosp Infect. 2000, 45, 288-292   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Tavora LGF, Gambale W, Heins-Vaccari EM, Arragada CLH, Lacaz CS, Santos CR, Levin AS. Comparative performance of two air samples for monitoring airborne fungal propagules. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003, 36, 613-616
5 An HR, Mainelis G, Tao M. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments. Indoor Air. 2004, 14, 385-393   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Friberg B, Friberg S, Osternsson R, Burman LG. Surgical area contamination-comparable bacterial counts using disposable head and mask and helmet aspirator system, but dramatic increase upon omission of headgear: an experimental study in horizontal laminar airflow. J Hosp Inf. 2001, 47, 110-115   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Portnoy JM, Barnes CS, Kennedy K Current reviews of allergy and clinical immunology J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004, 189-198
8 Pasquarella C, Masia MD, Nnanga N, Sansebastiano GE, Savino A, Signorelli C, Veronesi L. Microbial air monitoring in operating theatre: active and passive samplings Ann Ig. 2004, 16, 375-86
9 Obara T, Masuyama M, Fujita S, Yamauchi C. Observation on the air-borne and ammonia (NS3) gas in laboratory animals facility with rotary heat exchanger Jikken Dobutsu. 1979, 28, 79-83
10 Stetzenbach LD, Buttner MP, Cruz P. Detection and enumeration of air0borne biocontaminants. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2004, 15, 170-174   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Williams RH, Ward E, McCartney HA. Methods for integrated air sampling and DNA analysis for detection of airborne fungal spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2453-2459   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Collins GR, Goodheart CR. Methods for testing the ability of cage filtering materias to exclude air-borne microorganism. Lab Anim Care. 1968, 18, 469-474
13 Kenny LC, Bowry A, Crook B, Stancliffe JD. Field testing of a personal size-selective bioaerosol sampler. Am Occup Hyg. 1999, 43, 393-404   DOI
14 Buttner MP, Stetzenbach LD. Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993, 59, 219-226
15 Kock M, Schlacher R, Pichle-Semmelrock FP, reinthaler FF, Eibel U, Marth E, Friedl H. Air-borne microorganisms in the metropolitan area Graz, Austria Cent Eur J Public Health. 1998, 6, 25-28
16 Krysinska-Traczyk E, Skorska C, Prazmo Z, Sitkowska J, Cholewa G, Dutkiewicz J. Exposure to airborne microorganisms, dust and endotoxin during flax scutching on farms. Ann Agric Environ. 2004, 11, 309-317
17 Rule AM, Chapin AR, McCarthy SA, Gibson KE, Schwab KJ, Buckley TJ. Assessment of an aerosol treatment to improve air quality in a swine concentration animal feeding operation (CAFO). Environ Sci Technol. 2005, 39, 9649-9655   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Radmore K, Holzapfel WH, Luck H. proposed guidelines for maximum acceptable air-borne microorganism levels in diary processing and packaging plants. Int J Food Microbiol. 1988, 6, 91-95   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Landrin A, Bissery A, Kac G. Monitoring air sampling in operating theatres: can particle counting replace microbiological sampling? J Hosp Infect. 2005, 61, 27-29   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sivasubramani SK, Niemeier RT, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA. Assessment of the aerosolization potential for fungal spores in moldy homes Indoor Air. 2004, 14, 405-412   DOI   ScienceOn