Browse > Article

Sound parameters for classifying individual sows(Landrace×Yorkshire) during nursing behavior  

Jeon, Jung-Hwan (Division of Applied Life Science. Gyeongsang National University)
Chang, Hong-Hee (Division of Applied Life Science. Gyeongsang National University)
Ha, Jeung-Key (Division of Applied Life Science. Gyeongsang National University)
Kim, Hyeon-Hui (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
Koo, Ja-Min (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
Lee, Hyo-Jong (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
Yeon, Seong-Chan (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Veterinary Research / v.43, no.1, 2003 , pp. 165-169 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to analyse grunts of the sows and to extract parameters from the time and frequency signals in nursing behavior. Five crossbred $Landrace{\times}Yorkshire$ sows were used on day 5 or 6 postpartum. The grunts and the behaviors of the five sows were recorded with five digital camcorders. Three parameter groups [Group I: Formant vector alone, Group II: Formant vector+parameters from time signal, Group III: Formant vector+parameters from time signal-parameters eliminated by stepwise discriminant analysis backward (SDAB)] with parameter vectors extracted from single grunts in the maximum grunting rate period were used for individuality of the sows. The parameter groups were compared by a discriminant function analysis. The classification system adopted in the Group II represented the higher discriniation rate than those in other groups (Group I: 63.3%, Group II: 83.0%, Group III: 80.0%). This study demonstrated that formant, intensity, and pitch were available sound parameters for individuality of the sows during nursing behavior.
Keywords
sow; grunt; nursing behavior;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Algers B, Nursing in pigs: Communicating needs anddistribution resources. J Anim Sci, 71:2826-2831, 1993
2 Blackshaw JK, Jones DN, Thomas FJ. Vocal indivi-duality during suclding in the intensively housecl do-mestic pig. Appl Amin Behav, 50:33-41, 1996
3 Kasanen S, Algas B. A note on the effects of additional sow gruntings on suckling behaviour in piglets. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 75:93-101, 2002
4 White RG, DeShazer JA, Tiessler CJ, et aI. Vocalizaticn and physiological response of pigs during castration with or without a local anesthetic. J Anim Sci, 73:381-386, 1995
5 Jensen P, Algas B. An ethogram of piglet vocalizations during suckling. Appl Anim Ethol, 11: 237-248, 1984
6 Castem H, Algas B, Jensen P, et al. Suclding behavior and milk consumption in newbom piglets as a response to sow grunting. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 24:227-238, 1989
7 Xin H, DeShazer JA, Leger DW. Kg vocalizatiais under selected husbandry practices. Transactions of the ASAE, 32:2181-2184, 1989
8 Jensen P. Observation on the maternal behavior of free ranging domestic pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 16:131- 142, 1986
9 Shillito Qalser EE. Recognition of the sow's voice by neonatal piglets. Behaviour, 99:177-188, 1986
10 Schon PC, Puppe B, Gromyko T, et al. Common features and individual differences in nurse grunting of donaestic pigs(Sus Scrofa): A multi-parametric analysis. Behaviour, 136:49-66, 1999